Cargando…

Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications

In advance of a medical conference on the duty of candour for medical ethics educators, this paper discusses the duty of candour as a significant development in the culture of medicine. Those who teach medical ethics need to assess its implications for their own practice. It is also a duty that need...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Papanikitas, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28250827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2016.1146464
_version_ 1782511228635054080
author Papanikitas, Andrew
author_facet Papanikitas, Andrew
author_sort Papanikitas, Andrew
collection PubMed
description In advance of a medical conference on the duty of candour for medical ethics educators, this paper discusses the duty of candour as a significant development in the culture of medicine. Those who teach medical ethics need to assess its implications for their own practice. It is also a duty that needs to be critically examined in light of both patients’ interests and clinical work environments if it is to be practical and not meaningless rhetoric. Two examples of ways in which that critical examination might take place are outlined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5330345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53303452017-03-01 Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications Papanikitas, Andrew London J Prim Care (Abingdon) Landscape In advance of a medical conference on the duty of candour for medical ethics educators, this paper discusses the duty of candour as a significant development in the culture of medicine. Those who teach medical ethics need to assess its implications for their own practice. It is also a duty that needs to be critically examined in light of both patients’ interests and clinical work environments if it is to be practical and not meaningless rhetoric. Two examples of ways in which that critical examination might take place are outlined. Taylor & Francis 2016-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5330345/ /pubmed/28250827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2016.1146464 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Landscape
Papanikitas, Andrew
Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications
title Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications
title_full Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications
title_fullStr Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications
title_full_unstemmed Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications
title_short Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications
title_sort honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications
topic Landscape
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28250827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2016.1146464
work_keys_str_mv AT papanikitasandrew honestycandourandtransparencyclinicalimplications