Cargando…
Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications
In advance of a medical conference on the duty of candour for medical ethics educators, this paper discusses the duty of candour as a significant development in the culture of medicine. Those who teach medical ethics need to assess its implications for their own practice. It is also a duty that need...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28250827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2016.1146464 |
_version_ | 1782511228635054080 |
---|---|
author | Papanikitas, Andrew |
author_facet | Papanikitas, Andrew |
author_sort | Papanikitas, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | In advance of a medical conference on the duty of candour for medical ethics educators, this paper discusses the duty of candour as a significant development in the culture of medicine. Those who teach medical ethics need to assess its implications for their own practice. It is also a duty that needs to be critically examined in light of both patients’ interests and clinical work environments if it is to be practical and not meaningless rhetoric. Two examples of ways in which that critical examination might take place are outlined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5330345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53303452017-03-01 Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications Papanikitas, Andrew London J Prim Care (Abingdon) Landscape In advance of a medical conference on the duty of candour for medical ethics educators, this paper discusses the duty of candour as a significant development in the culture of medicine. Those who teach medical ethics need to assess its implications for their own practice. It is also a duty that needs to be critically examined in light of both patients’ interests and clinical work environments if it is to be practical and not meaningless rhetoric. Two examples of ways in which that critical examination might take place are outlined. Taylor & Francis 2016-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5330345/ /pubmed/28250827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2016.1146464 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Landscape Papanikitas, Andrew Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications |
title | Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications |
title_full | Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications |
title_fullStr | Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications |
title_short | Honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications |
title_sort | honesty, candour, and transparency: clinical implications |
topic | Landscape |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28250827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2016.1146464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papanikitasandrew honestycandourandtransparencyclinicalimplications |