Cargando…
Too Many Journals
Policies promoting open access publishing have resulted in a startling increase in the number of gold open‐access publishing groups, some of which have been identified as “predatory” in nature. This commentary aims toward a better understanding of the characteristics of predatory publishing groups,...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AlphaMed Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28188259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0012 |
Sumario: | Policies promoting open access publishing have resulted in a startling increase in the number of gold open‐access publishing groups, some of which have been identified as “predatory” in nature. This commentary aims toward a better understanding of the characteristics of predatory publishing groups, discusses the negative aspects of accepting spam e‐mail invitations to publish in their journals, and encourages thought about an alternative direction for biomedical publishing. |
---|