Cargando…

How Mechanical Ventilation Measurement, Cutoff and Duration Affect Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Accuracy: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: Decreased accuracy of the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) can stem from 1) the method used to obtain this index, 2) duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and 3) the established cutoff point. The objective was to evaluate the values of RSBI determined by three different methods, u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goncalves, Elaine Cristina, Lago, Alessandra Fabiane, Silva, Elaine Caetano, de Almeida, Marcelo Barros, Basile-Filho, Anibal, Gastaldi, Ada Clarice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28270888
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2856w
_version_ 1782511270792003584
author Goncalves, Elaine Cristina
Lago, Alessandra Fabiane
Silva, Elaine Caetano
de Almeida, Marcelo Barros
Basile-Filho, Anibal
Gastaldi, Ada Clarice
author_facet Goncalves, Elaine Cristina
Lago, Alessandra Fabiane
Silva, Elaine Caetano
de Almeida, Marcelo Barros
Basile-Filho, Anibal
Gastaldi, Ada Clarice
author_sort Goncalves, Elaine Cristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decreased accuracy of the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) can stem from 1) the method used to obtain this index, 2) duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and 3) the established cutoff point. The objective was to evaluate the values of RSBI determined by three different methods, using distinct MV times and cutoff points. METHODS: This prospective study included 40 subjects. Before extubation, three different methods were employed to measure RSBI: pressure support ventilator (PSV) (PSV = 5 - 8 cm H(2)O; positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) = 5 cm H(2)O) (RSBI_MIN), automatic tube compensation (ATC) (PSV = 0, PEEP = 5 cm H(2)O, and 100% tube compensation) (RSBI_ATC), and disconnected MV (RSBI_SP). The results were analyzed according to the MV period (less than or over 72 h) and to the outcome of extubation (< 72 h, successful and failed; > 72 h successful and failed). The accuracy of each method was determined at different cutoff points (105, 78, and 50 cycles/min/L). RESULTS: The RSBI_MIN, RSBI_ATC, and RSBI_SP values in the group < 72 h were 38 ± 18, 45 ± 26 and 55 ± 22; in the group > 72 h, RSBI_SP value was higher than those of RSBI_ATC and RSBI_MIN (78 ± 29, 51 ± 19 and 39 ± 14) (P < 0.001). For patients with MV > 72 h who failed in removing MV, the RSBI_SP was higher (93 ± 28, 58 ± 18 and 41 ± 10) (P < 0.000), with greater accuracy at cutoff of 78. CONCLUSION: RSBI_SP associated with cutoff point < 78 cycles/min/L seems to be the best strategy to identify failed extubation in subjects with MV for over 72 h.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5330771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53307712017-03-07 How Mechanical Ventilation Measurement, Cutoff and Duration Affect Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Accuracy: A Randomized Trial Goncalves, Elaine Cristina Lago, Alessandra Fabiane Silva, Elaine Caetano de Almeida, Marcelo Barros Basile-Filho, Anibal Gastaldi, Ada Clarice J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Decreased accuracy of the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) can stem from 1) the method used to obtain this index, 2) duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and 3) the established cutoff point. The objective was to evaluate the values of RSBI determined by three different methods, using distinct MV times and cutoff points. METHODS: This prospective study included 40 subjects. Before extubation, three different methods were employed to measure RSBI: pressure support ventilator (PSV) (PSV = 5 - 8 cm H(2)O; positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) = 5 cm H(2)O) (RSBI_MIN), automatic tube compensation (ATC) (PSV = 0, PEEP = 5 cm H(2)O, and 100% tube compensation) (RSBI_ATC), and disconnected MV (RSBI_SP). The results were analyzed according to the MV period (less than or over 72 h) and to the outcome of extubation (< 72 h, successful and failed; > 72 h successful and failed). The accuracy of each method was determined at different cutoff points (105, 78, and 50 cycles/min/L). RESULTS: The RSBI_MIN, RSBI_ATC, and RSBI_SP values in the group < 72 h were 38 ± 18, 45 ± 26 and 55 ± 22; in the group > 72 h, RSBI_SP value was higher than those of RSBI_ATC and RSBI_MIN (78 ± 29, 51 ± 19 and 39 ± 14) (P < 0.001). For patients with MV > 72 h who failed in removing MV, the RSBI_SP was higher (93 ± 28, 58 ± 18 and 41 ± 10) (P < 0.000), with greater accuracy at cutoff of 78. CONCLUSION: RSBI_SP associated with cutoff point < 78 cycles/min/L seems to be the best strategy to identify failed extubation in subjects with MV for over 72 h. Elmer Press 2017-04 2017-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5330771/ /pubmed/28270888 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2856w Text en Copyright 2017, Goncalves et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goncalves, Elaine Cristina
Lago, Alessandra Fabiane
Silva, Elaine Caetano
de Almeida, Marcelo Barros
Basile-Filho, Anibal
Gastaldi, Ada Clarice
How Mechanical Ventilation Measurement, Cutoff and Duration Affect Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Accuracy: A Randomized Trial
title How Mechanical Ventilation Measurement, Cutoff and Duration Affect Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Accuracy: A Randomized Trial
title_full How Mechanical Ventilation Measurement, Cutoff and Duration Affect Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Accuracy: A Randomized Trial
title_fullStr How Mechanical Ventilation Measurement, Cutoff and Duration Affect Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Accuracy: A Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed How Mechanical Ventilation Measurement, Cutoff and Duration Affect Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Accuracy: A Randomized Trial
title_short How Mechanical Ventilation Measurement, Cutoff and Duration Affect Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Accuracy: A Randomized Trial
title_sort how mechanical ventilation measurement, cutoff and duration affect rapid shallow breathing index accuracy: a randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28270888
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2856w
work_keys_str_mv AT goncalveselainecristina howmechanicalventilationmeasurementcutoffanddurationaffectrapidshallowbreathingindexaccuracyarandomizedtrial
AT lagoalessandrafabiane howmechanicalventilationmeasurementcutoffanddurationaffectrapidshallowbreathingindexaccuracyarandomizedtrial
AT silvaelainecaetano howmechanicalventilationmeasurementcutoffanddurationaffectrapidshallowbreathingindexaccuracyarandomizedtrial
AT dealmeidamarcelobarros howmechanicalventilationmeasurementcutoffanddurationaffectrapidshallowbreathingindexaccuracyarandomizedtrial
AT basilefilhoanibal howmechanicalventilationmeasurementcutoffanddurationaffectrapidshallowbreathingindexaccuracyarandomizedtrial
AT gastaldiadaclarice howmechanicalventilationmeasurementcutoffanddurationaffectrapidshallowbreathingindexaccuracyarandomizedtrial