Cargando…
Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter
Root biomass is one of the most relevant root parameters for studies of plant response to environmental change, soil carbon modeling or estimations of soil carbon sequestration. A major source of error in root biomass quantification of agricultural crops in the field is the presence of extraneous or...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298919 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00284 |
_version_ | 1782511297480359936 |
---|---|
author | Hirte, Juliane Leifeld, Jens Abiven, Samuel Oberholzer, Hans-Rudolf Hammelehle, Andreas Mayer, Jochen |
author_facet | Hirte, Juliane Leifeld, Jens Abiven, Samuel Oberholzer, Hans-Rudolf Hammelehle, Andreas Mayer, Jochen |
author_sort | Hirte, Juliane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Root biomass is one of the most relevant root parameters for studies of plant response to environmental change, soil carbon modeling or estimations of soil carbon sequestration. A major source of error in root biomass quantification of agricultural crops in the field is the presence of extraneous organic matter in soil: dead roots from previous crops, weed roots, incorporated above ground plant residues and organic soil amendments, or remnants of soil fauna. Using the isotopic difference between recent maize root biomass and predominantly C3-derived extraneous organic matter, we determined the proportions of maize root biomass carbon of total carbon in root samples from the Swiss long-term field trial “DOK.” We additionally evaluated the effects of agricultural management (bio-organic and conventional), sampling depth (0–0.25, 0.25–0.5, 0.5–0.75 m) and position (within and between maize rows), and root size class (coarse and fine roots) as defined by sieve mesh size (2 and 0.5 mm) on those proportions, and quantified the success rate of manual exclusion of extraneous organic matter from root samples. Only 60% of the root mass that we retrieved from field soil cores was actual maize root biomass from the current season. While the proportions of maize root biomass carbon were not affected by agricultural management, they increased consistently with soil depth, were higher within than between maize rows, and were higher in coarse (>2 mm) than in fine (≤2 and >0.5) root samples. The success rate of manual exclusion of extraneous organic matter from root samples was related to agricultural management and, at best, about 60%. We assume that the composition of extraneous organic matter is strongly influenced by agricultural management and soil depth and governs the effect size of the investigated factors. Extraneous organic matter may result in severe overestimation of recovered root biomass and has, therefore, large implications for soil carbon modeling and estimations of the climate change mitigation potential of soils. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5331040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53310402017-03-15 Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter Hirte, Juliane Leifeld, Jens Abiven, Samuel Oberholzer, Hans-Rudolf Hammelehle, Andreas Mayer, Jochen Front Plant Sci Plant Science Root biomass is one of the most relevant root parameters for studies of plant response to environmental change, soil carbon modeling or estimations of soil carbon sequestration. A major source of error in root biomass quantification of agricultural crops in the field is the presence of extraneous organic matter in soil: dead roots from previous crops, weed roots, incorporated above ground plant residues and organic soil amendments, or remnants of soil fauna. Using the isotopic difference between recent maize root biomass and predominantly C3-derived extraneous organic matter, we determined the proportions of maize root biomass carbon of total carbon in root samples from the Swiss long-term field trial “DOK.” We additionally evaluated the effects of agricultural management (bio-organic and conventional), sampling depth (0–0.25, 0.25–0.5, 0.5–0.75 m) and position (within and between maize rows), and root size class (coarse and fine roots) as defined by sieve mesh size (2 and 0.5 mm) on those proportions, and quantified the success rate of manual exclusion of extraneous organic matter from root samples. Only 60% of the root mass that we retrieved from field soil cores was actual maize root biomass from the current season. While the proportions of maize root biomass carbon were not affected by agricultural management, they increased consistently with soil depth, were higher within than between maize rows, and were higher in coarse (>2 mm) than in fine (≤2 and >0.5) root samples. The success rate of manual exclusion of extraneous organic matter from root samples was related to agricultural management and, at best, about 60%. We assume that the composition of extraneous organic matter is strongly influenced by agricultural management and soil depth and governs the effect size of the investigated factors. Extraneous organic matter may result in severe overestimation of recovered root biomass and has, therefore, large implications for soil carbon modeling and estimations of the climate change mitigation potential of soils. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5331040/ /pubmed/28298919 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00284 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hirte, Leifeld, Abiven, Oberholzer, Hammelehle and Mayer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Hirte, Juliane Leifeld, Jens Abiven, Samuel Oberholzer, Hans-Rudolf Hammelehle, Andreas Mayer, Jochen Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter |
title | Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter |
title_full | Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter |
title_fullStr | Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter |
title_full_unstemmed | Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter |
title_short | Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter |
title_sort | overestimation of crop root biomass in field experiments due to extraneous organic matter |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298919 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirtejuliane overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter AT leifeldjens overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter AT abivensamuel overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter AT oberholzerhansrudolf overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter AT hammelehleandreas overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter AT mayerjochen overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter |