Cargando…

Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter

Root biomass is one of the most relevant root parameters for studies of plant response to environmental change, soil carbon modeling or estimations of soil carbon sequestration. A major source of error in root biomass quantification of agricultural crops in the field is the presence of extraneous or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirte, Juliane, Leifeld, Jens, Abiven, Samuel, Oberholzer, Hans-Rudolf, Hammelehle, Andreas, Mayer, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00284
_version_ 1782511297480359936
author Hirte, Juliane
Leifeld, Jens
Abiven, Samuel
Oberholzer, Hans-Rudolf
Hammelehle, Andreas
Mayer, Jochen
author_facet Hirte, Juliane
Leifeld, Jens
Abiven, Samuel
Oberholzer, Hans-Rudolf
Hammelehle, Andreas
Mayer, Jochen
author_sort Hirte, Juliane
collection PubMed
description Root biomass is one of the most relevant root parameters for studies of plant response to environmental change, soil carbon modeling or estimations of soil carbon sequestration. A major source of error in root biomass quantification of agricultural crops in the field is the presence of extraneous organic matter in soil: dead roots from previous crops, weed roots, incorporated above ground plant residues and organic soil amendments, or remnants of soil fauna. Using the isotopic difference between recent maize root biomass and predominantly C3-derived extraneous organic matter, we determined the proportions of maize root biomass carbon of total carbon in root samples from the Swiss long-term field trial “DOK.” We additionally evaluated the effects of agricultural management (bio-organic and conventional), sampling depth (0–0.25, 0.25–0.5, 0.5–0.75 m) and position (within and between maize rows), and root size class (coarse and fine roots) as defined by sieve mesh size (2 and 0.5 mm) on those proportions, and quantified the success rate of manual exclusion of extraneous organic matter from root samples. Only 60% of the root mass that we retrieved from field soil cores was actual maize root biomass from the current season. While the proportions of maize root biomass carbon were not affected by agricultural management, they increased consistently with soil depth, were higher within than between maize rows, and were higher in coarse (>2 mm) than in fine (≤2 and >0.5) root samples. The success rate of manual exclusion of extraneous organic matter from root samples was related to agricultural management and, at best, about 60%. We assume that the composition of extraneous organic matter is strongly influenced by agricultural management and soil depth and governs the effect size of the investigated factors. Extraneous organic matter may result in severe overestimation of recovered root biomass and has, therefore, large implications for soil carbon modeling and estimations of the climate change mitigation potential of soils.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5331040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53310402017-03-15 Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter Hirte, Juliane Leifeld, Jens Abiven, Samuel Oberholzer, Hans-Rudolf Hammelehle, Andreas Mayer, Jochen Front Plant Sci Plant Science Root biomass is one of the most relevant root parameters for studies of plant response to environmental change, soil carbon modeling or estimations of soil carbon sequestration. A major source of error in root biomass quantification of agricultural crops in the field is the presence of extraneous organic matter in soil: dead roots from previous crops, weed roots, incorporated above ground plant residues and organic soil amendments, or remnants of soil fauna. Using the isotopic difference between recent maize root biomass and predominantly C3-derived extraneous organic matter, we determined the proportions of maize root biomass carbon of total carbon in root samples from the Swiss long-term field trial “DOK.” We additionally evaluated the effects of agricultural management (bio-organic and conventional), sampling depth (0–0.25, 0.25–0.5, 0.5–0.75 m) and position (within and between maize rows), and root size class (coarse and fine roots) as defined by sieve mesh size (2 and 0.5 mm) on those proportions, and quantified the success rate of manual exclusion of extraneous organic matter from root samples. Only 60% of the root mass that we retrieved from field soil cores was actual maize root biomass from the current season. While the proportions of maize root biomass carbon were not affected by agricultural management, they increased consistently with soil depth, were higher within than between maize rows, and were higher in coarse (>2 mm) than in fine (≤2 and >0.5) root samples. The success rate of manual exclusion of extraneous organic matter from root samples was related to agricultural management and, at best, about 60%. We assume that the composition of extraneous organic matter is strongly influenced by agricultural management and soil depth and governs the effect size of the investigated factors. Extraneous organic matter may result in severe overestimation of recovered root biomass and has, therefore, large implications for soil carbon modeling and estimations of the climate change mitigation potential of soils. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5331040/ /pubmed/28298919 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00284 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hirte, Leifeld, Abiven, Oberholzer, Hammelehle and Mayer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Hirte, Juliane
Leifeld, Jens
Abiven, Samuel
Oberholzer, Hans-Rudolf
Hammelehle, Andreas
Mayer, Jochen
Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter
title Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter
title_full Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter
title_fullStr Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter
title_full_unstemmed Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter
title_short Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter
title_sort overestimation of crop root biomass in field experiments due to extraneous organic matter
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00284
work_keys_str_mv AT hirtejuliane overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter
AT leifeldjens overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter
AT abivensamuel overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter
AT oberholzerhansrudolf overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter
AT hammelehleandreas overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter
AT mayerjochen overestimationofcroprootbiomassinfieldexperimentsduetoextraneousorganicmatter