Cargando…
An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To establish the contribution of maternal, fetal and intrapartum factors to the risk of incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and assess the feasibility of an OASIS risk prediction model based on variables available to clinicians prior to birth. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27589856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2 |
_version_ | 1782511308107677696 |
---|---|
author | Webb, Sara S. Hemming, Karla Khalfaoui, Madhi Y. Henriksen, Tine Brink Kindberg, Sara Stensgaard, Stine Kettle, Christine Ismail, Khaled M. K. |
author_facet | Webb, Sara S. Hemming, Karla Khalfaoui, Madhi Y. Henriksen, Tine Brink Kindberg, Sara Stensgaard, Stine Kettle, Christine Ismail, Khaled M. K. |
author_sort | Webb, Sara S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To establish the contribution of maternal, fetal and intrapartum factors to the risk of incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and assess the feasibility of an OASIS risk prediction model based on variables available to clinicians prior to birth. METHODS: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study using single-site data from the birth database of Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The participants were all women who had a singleton vaginal birth during the period 1989 to 2006. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using multiple imputations for missing data and internally validated using bootstrap methods. The main outcome measures were the contributions of maternal, fetal and intrapartum events to the incidence of OASIS. RESULTS: A total of 71,469 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1,754 (2.45 %) sustained OASIS. In the multivariate analysis of variables known prior to birth, maternal age 20 – 30 years (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.44 – 1.89) and ≥30 years (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.39 – 1.85), occipitoposterior fetal position (OR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.06 – 1.70), induction/augmentation of labour (OR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.32 – 1.62), and suspected macrosomia (OR 2.20, 95 % CI 1.97 – 2.45) were independent significant predictors of OASIS, with increasing parity conferring a significant protective effect. The ‘prebirth variable’ model showed a 95 % sensitivity and a 24 % specificity in predicting OASIS with 1 % probability, and a 3 % sensitivity and a 99 % specificity in predicting OASIS with a 10 % probability. CONCLUSIONS: Our model identified several significant OASIS risk factors that are known prior to actual birth. The prognostic model shows potential for ruling out OASIS (high sensitivity with a low risk cut-off value), but is not useful for ruling in the event. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5331086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53310862017-03-13 An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool? Webb, Sara S. Hemming, Karla Khalfaoui, Madhi Y. Henriksen, Tine Brink Kindberg, Sara Stensgaard, Stine Kettle, Christine Ismail, Khaled M. K. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To establish the contribution of maternal, fetal and intrapartum factors to the risk of incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and assess the feasibility of an OASIS risk prediction model based on variables available to clinicians prior to birth. METHODS: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study using single-site data from the birth database of Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The participants were all women who had a singleton vaginal birth during the period 1989 to 2006. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using multiple imputations for missing data and internally validated using bootstrap methods. The main outcome measures were the contributions of maternal, fetal and intrapartum events to the incidence of OASIS. RESULTS: A total of 71,469 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1,754 (2.45 %) sustained OASIS. In the multivariate analysis of variables known prior to birth, maternal age 20 – 30 years (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.44 – 1.89) and ≥30 years (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.39 – 1.85), occipitoposterior fetal position (OR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.06 – 1.70), induction/augmentation of labour (OR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.32 – 1.62), and suspected macrosomia (OR 2.20, 95 % CI 1.97 – 2.45) were independent significant predictors of OASIS, with increasing parity conferring a significant protective effect. The ‘prebirth variable’ model showed a 95 % sensitivity and a 24 % specificity in predicting OASIS with 1 % probability, and a 3 % sensitivity and a 99 % specificity in predicting OASIS with a 10 % probability. CONCLUSIONS: Our model identified several significant OASIS risk factors that are known prior to actual birth. The prognostic model shows potential for ruling out OASIS (high sensitivity with a low risk cut-off value), but is not useful for ruling in the event. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer London 2016-09-02 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5331086/ /pubmed/27589856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Webb, Sara S. Hemming, Karla Khalfaoui, Madhi Y. Henriksen, Tine Brink Kindberg, Sara Stensgaard, Stine Kettle, Christine Ismail, Khaled M. K. An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool? |
title | An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool? |
title_full | An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool? |
title_fullStr | An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool? |
title_full_unstemmed | An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool? |
title_short | An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool? |
title_sort | obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (osiris): is this a clinically useful tool? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27589856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT webbsaras anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT hemmingkarla anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT khalfaouimadhiy anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT henriksentinebrink anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT kindbergsara anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT stensgaardstine anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT kettlechristine anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT ismailkhaledmk anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT webbsaras obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT hemmingkarla obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT khalfaouimadhiy obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT henriksentinebrink obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT kindbergsara obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT stensgaardstine obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT kettlechristine obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool AT ismailkhaledmk obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool |