Cargando…

An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To establish the contribution of maternal, fetal and intrapartum factors to the risk of incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and assess the feasibility of an OASIS risk prediction model based on variables available to clinicians prior to birth. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webb, Sara S., Hemming, Karla, Khalfaoui, Madhi Y., Henriksen, Tine Brink, Kindberg, Sara, Stensgaard, Stine, Kettle, Christine, Ismail, Khaled M. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27589856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2
_version_ 1782511308107677696
author Webb, Sara S.
Hemming, Karla
Khalfaoui, Madhi Y.
Henriksen, Tine Brink
Kindberg, Sara
Stensgaard, Stine
Kettle, Christine
Ismail, Khaled M. K.
author_facet Webb, Sara S.
Hemming, Karla
Khalfaoui, Madhi Y.
Henriksen, Tine Brink
Kindberg, Sara
Stensgaard, Stine
Kettle, Christine
Ismail, Khaled M. K.
author_sort Webb, Sara S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To establish the contribution of maternal, fetal and intrapartum factors to the risk of incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and assess the feasibility of an OASIS risk prediction model based on variables available to clinicians prior to birth. METHODS: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study using single-site data from the birth database of Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The participants were all women who had a singleton vaginal birth during the period 1989 to 2006. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using multiple imputations for missing data and internally validated using bootstrap methods. The main outcome measures were the contributions of maternal, fetal and intrapartum events to the incidence of OASIS. RESULTS: A total of 71,469 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1,754 (2.45 %) sustained OASIS. In the multivariate analysis of variables known prior to birth, maternal age 20 – 30 years (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.44 – 1.89) and ≥30 years (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.39 – 1.85), occipitoposterior fetal position (OR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.06 – 1.70), induction/augmentation of labour (OR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.32 – 1.62), and suspected macrosomia (OR 2.20, 95 % CI 1.97 – 2.45) were independent significant predictors of OASIS, with increasing parity conferring a significant protective effect. The ‘prebirth variable’ model showed a 95 % sensitivity and a 24 % specificity in predicting OASIS with 1 % probability, and a 3 % sensitivity and a 99 % specificity in predicting OASIS with a 10 % probability. CONCLUSIONS: Our model identified several significant OASIS risk factors that are known prior to actual birth. The prognostic model shows potential for ruling out OASIS (high sensitivity with a low risk cut-off value), but is not useful for ruling in the event. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5331086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53310862017-03-13 An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool? Webb, Sara S. Hemming, Karla Khalfaoui, Madhi Y. Henriksen, Tine Brink Kindberg, Sara Stensgaard, Stine Kettle, Christine Ismail, Khaled M. K. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To establish the contribution of maternal, fetal and intrapartum factors to the risk of incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and assess the feasibility of an OASIS risk prediction model based on variables available to clinicians prior to birth. METHODS: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study using single-site data from the birth database of Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The participants were all women who had a singleton vaginal birth during the period 1989 to 2006. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using multiple imputations for missing data and internally validated using bootstrap methods. The main outcome measures were the contributions of maternal, fetal and intrapartum events to the incidence of OASIS. RESULTS: A total of 71,469 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1,754 (2.45 %) sustained OASIS. In the multivariate analysis of variables known prior to birth, maternal age 20 – 30 years (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.44 – 1.89) and ≥30 years (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.39 – 1.85), occipitoposterior fetal position (OR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.06 – 1.70), induction/augmentation of labour (OR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.32 – 1.62), and suspected macrosomia (OR 2.20, 95 % CI 1.97 – 2.45) were independent significant predictors of OASIS, with increasing parity conferring a significant protective effect. The ‘prebirth variable’ model showed a 95 % sensitivity and a 24 % specificity in predicting OASIS with 1 % probability, and a 3 % sensitivity and a 99 % specificity in predicting OASIS with a 10 % probability. CONCLUSIONS: Our model identified several significant OASIS risk factors that are known prior to actual birth. The prognostic model shows potential for ruling out OASIS (high sensitivity with a low risk cut-off value), but is not useful for ruling in the event. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer London 2016-09-02 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5331086/ /pubmed/27589856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Webb, Sara S.
Hemming, Karla
Khalfaoui, Madhi Y.
Henriksen, Tine Brink
Kindberg, Sara
Stensgaard, Stine
Kettle, Christine
Ismail, Khaled M. K.
An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?
title An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?
title_full An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?
title_fullStr An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?
title_full_unstemmed An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?
title_short An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?
title_sort obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (osiris): is this a clinically useful tool?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27589856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2
work_keys_str_mv AT webbsaras anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT hemmingkarla anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT khalfaouimadhiy anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT henriksentinebrink anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT kindbergsara anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT stensgaardstine anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT kettlechristine anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT ismailkhaledmk anobstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT webbsaras obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT hemmingkarla obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT khalfaouimadhiy obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT henriksentinebrink obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT kindbergsara obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT stensgaardstine obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT kettlechristine obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool
AT ismailkhaledmk obstetricsphincterinjuryriskidentificationsystemosirisisthisaclinicallyusefultool