Cargando…

A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden

Family migration policy, once basing citizens and resident foreigners’ possibilities to bring in foreign family members mainly on the right to family life, is increasingly a tool states use to limit immigration and to push newcomers to integrate into civic and economic life. The family migration pol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bech, Emily Cochran, Borevi, Karin, Mouritsen, Per
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40878-016-0046-7
_version_ 1782511311346728960
author Bech, Emily Cochran
Borevi, Karin
Mouritsen, Per
author_facet Bech, Emily Cochran
Borevi, Karin
Mouritsen, Per
author_sort Bech, Emily Cochran
collection PubMed
description Family migration policy, once basing citizens and resident foreigners’ possibilities to bring in foreign family members mainly on the right to family life, is increasingly a tool states use to limit immigration and to push newcomers to integrate into civic and economic life. The family migration policies of Denmark, Norway and Sweden range widely – from more minimal support and age requirements to high expectations of language skills, work records and even income levels. While in Denmark and increasingly in Norway growing sets of requirements have been justified on the need to protect the welfare state and a Nordic liberal way of life, in Sweden more minimal requirements have been introduced in the name of spurring immigrants’ labor market integration even as rights-based reasoning has continued to dominate. In all three countries, new restrictions have been introduced in the wake of the refugee crisis. These cases show how prioritizations of the right to family life vis-à-vis welfare-state sustainability have produced different rules for family entry, and how family migration policies are used to different extents to push civic integration of both new and already settled immigrants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5331100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53311002017-03-14 A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden Bech, Emily Cochran Borevi, Karin Mouritsen, Per Comp Migr Stud Original Article Family migration policy, once basing citizens and resident foreigners’ possibilities to bring in foreign family members mainly on the right to family life, is increasingly a tool states use to limit immigration and to push newcomers to integrate into civic and economic life. The family migration policies of Denmark, Norway and Sweden range widely – from more minimal support and age requirements to high expectations of language skills, work records and even income levels. While in Denmark and increasingly in Norway growing sets of requirements have been justified on the need to protect the welfare state and a Nordic liberal way of life, in Sweden more minimal requirements have been introduced in the name of spurring immigrants’ labor market integration even as rights-based reasoning has continued to dominate. In all three countries, new restrictions have been introduced in the wake of the refugee crisis. These cases show how prioritizations of the right to family life vis-à-vis welfare-state sustainability have produced different rules for family entry, and how family migration policies are used to different extents to push civic integration of both new and already settled immigrants. Springer International Publishing 2017-03-01 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5331100/ /pubmed/28303235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40878-016-0046-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bech, Emily Cochran
Borevi, Karin
Mouritsen, Per
A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden
title A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden
title_full A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden
title_fullStr A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden
title_full_unstemmed A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden
title_short A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden
title_sort ‘civic turn’ in scandinavian family migration policies? comparing denmark, norway and sweden
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40878-016-0046-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bechemilycochran acivicturninscandinavianfamilymigrationpoliciescomparingdenmarknorwayandsweden
AT borevikarin acivicturninscandinavianfamilymigrationpoliciescomparingdenmarknorwayandsweden
AT mouritsenper acivicturninscandinavianfamilymigrationpoliciescomparingdenmarknorwayandsweden
AT bechemilycochran civicturninscandinavianfamilymigrationpoliciescomparingdenmarknorwayandsweden
AT borevikarin civicturninscandinavianfamilymigrationpoliciescomparingdenmarknorwayandsweden
AT mouritsenper civicturninscandinavianfamilymigrationpoliciescomparingdenmarknorwayandsweden