Cargando…

Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with (82)Rb PET

Purpose. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification with (82)Rb positron emission tomography (PET) is gaining clinical adoption, but improvements in precision are desired. This study aims to identify analysis variants producing the most repeatable MBF measures. Methods. 12 volunteers underwent same-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ocneanu, Adrian F., deKemp, Robert A., Renaud, Jennifer M., Adler, Andy, Beanlands, Rob S. B., Klein, Ran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6810626
_version_ 1782511319975460864
author Ocneanu, Adrian F.
deKemp, Robert A.
Renaud, Jennifer M.
Adler, Andy
Beanlands, Rob S. B.
Klein, Ran
author_facet Ocneanu, Adrian F.
deKemp, Robert A.
Renaud, Jennifer M.
Adler, Andy
Beanlands, Rob S. B.
Klein, Ran
author_sort Ocneanu, Adrian F.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification with (82)Rb positron emission tomography (PET) is gaining clinical adoption, but improvements in precision are desired. This study aims to identify analysis variants producing the most repeatable MBF measures. Methods. 12 volunteers underwent same-day test-retest rest and dipyridamole stress imaging with dynamic (82)Rb PET, from which MBF was quantified using 1-tissue-compartment kinetic model variants: (1) blood-pool versus uptake region sampled input function (Blood/Uptake-ROI), (2) dual spillover correction (SOC-On/Off), (3) right blood correction (RBC-On/Off), (4) arterial blood transit delay (Delay-On/Off), and (5) distribution volume (DV) constraint (Global/Regional-DV). Repeatability of MBF, stress/rest myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and stress/rest MBF difference (ΔMBF) was assessed using nonparametric reproducibility coefficients (RPC(np) = 1.45 × interquartile range). Results. MBF using SOC-On, RVBC-Off, Blood-ROI, Global-DV, and Delay-Off was most repeatable for combined rest and stress: RPC(np) = 0.21 mL/min/g (15.8%). Corresponding MFR and ΔMBF RPC(np) were 0.42 (20.2%) and 0.24 mL/min/g (23.5%). MBF repeatability improved with SOC-On at stress (p < 0.001) and tended to improve with RBC-Off at both rest and stress (p < 0.08). DV and ROI did not significantly influence repeatability. The Delay-On model was overdetermined and did not reliably converge. Conclusion. MBF and MFR test-retest repeatability were the best with dual spillover correction, left atrium blood input function, and global DV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5331165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53311652017-03-14 Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with (82)Rb PET Ocneanu, Adrian F. deKemp, Robert A. Renaud, Jennifer M. Adler, Andy Beanlands, Rob S. B. Klein, Ran Comput Math Methods Med Research Article Purpose. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification with (82)Rb positron emission tomography (PET) is gaining clinical adoption, but improvements in precision are desired. This study aims to identify analysis variants producing the most repeatable MBF measures. Methods. 12 volunteers underwent same-day test-retest rest and dipyridamole stress imaging with dynamic (82)Rb PET, from which MBF was quantified using 1-tissue-compartment kinetic model variants: (1) blood-pool versus uptake region sampled input function (Blood/Uptake-ROI), (2) dual spillover correction (SOC-On/Off), (3) right blood correction (RBC-On/Off), (4) arterial blood transit delay (Delay-On/Off), and (5) distribution volume (DV) constraint (Global/Regional-DV). Repeatability of MBF, stress/rest myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and stress/rest MBF difference (ΔMBF) was assessed using nonparametric reproducibility coefficients (RPC(np) = 1.45 × interquartile range). Results. MBF using SOC-On, RVBC-Off, Blood-ROI, Global-DV, and Delay-Off was most repeatable for combined rest and stress: RPC(np) = 0.21 mL/min/g (15.8%). Corresponding MFR and ΔMBF RPC(np) were 0.42 (20.2%) and 0.24 mL/min/g (23.5%). MBF repeatability improved with SOC-On at stress (p < 0.001) and tended to improve with RBC-Off at both rest and stress (p < 0.08). DV and ROI did not significantly influence repeatability. The Delay-On model was overdetermined and did not reliably converge. Conclusion. MBF and MFR test-retest repeatability were the best with dual spillover correction, left atrium blood input function, and global DV. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5331165/ /pubmed/28293274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6810626 Text en Copyright © 2017 Adrian F. Ocneanu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ocneanu, Adrian F.
deKemp, Robert A.
Renaud, Jennifer M.
Adler, Andy
Beanlands, Rob S. B.
Klein, Ran
Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with (82)Rb PET
title Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with (82)Rb PET
title_full Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with (82)Rb PET
title_fullStr Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with (82)Rb PET
title_full_unstemmed Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with (82)Rb PET
title_short Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with (82)Rb PET
title_sort optimally repeatable kinetic model variant for myocardial blood flow measurements with (82)rb pet
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6810626
work_keys_str_mv AT ocneanuadrianf optimallyrepeatablekineticmodelvariantformyocardialbloodflowmeasurementswith82rbpet
AT dekemproberta optimallyrepeatablekineticmodelvariantformyocardialbloodflowmeasurementswith82rbpet
AT renaudjenniferm optimallyrepeatablekineticmodelvariantformyocardialbloodflowmeasurementswith82rbpet
AT adlerandy optimallyrepeatablekineticmodelvariantformyocardialbloodflowmeasurementswith82rbpet
AT beanlandsrobsb optimallyrepeatablekineticmodelvariantformyocardialbloodflowmeasurementswith82rbpet
AT kleinran optimallyrepeatablekineticmodelvariantformyocardialbloodflowmeasurementswith82rbpet