Cargando…

Screening for Child Sexual Exploitation in Online Sexual Health Services: An Exploratory Study of Expert Views

BACKGROUND: Sexual health services routinely screen for child sexual exploitation (CSE). Although sexual health services are increasingly provided online, there has been no research on the translation of the safeguarding function to online services. We studied expert practitioner views on safeguardi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spencer-Hughes, Victoria, Syred, Jonathan, Allison, Alison, Holdsworth, Gillian, Baraitser, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196790
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5911
_version_ 1782511324519989248
author Spencer-Hughes, Victoria
Syred, Jonathan
Allison, Alison
Holdsworth, Gillian
Baraitser, Paula
author_facet Spencer-Hughes, Victoria
Syred, Jonathan
Allison, Alison
Holdsworth, Gillian
Baraitser, Paula
author_sort Spencer-Hughes, Victoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sexual health services routinely screen for child sexual exploitation (CSE). Although sexual health services are increasingly provided online, there has been no research on the translation of the safeguarding function to online services. We studied expert practitioner views on safeguarding in this context. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to document expert practitioner views on safeguarding in the context of an online sexual health service. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with lead professionals purposively sampled from local, regional, or national organizations with a direct influence over CSE protocols, child protection policies, and sexual health services. Interviews were analyzed by three researchers using a matrix-based analytic method. RESULTS: Our respondents described two different approaches to safeguarding. The “information-providing” approach considers that young people experiencing CSE will ask for help when they are ready from someone they trust. The primary function of the service is to provide information, provoke reflection, generate trust, and respond reliably to disclosure. The approach values online services as an anonymous space to test out disclosure without commitment. The “information-gathering” approach considers that young people may withhold information about exploitation. Therefore, services should seek out information to assess risk and initiate disclosure. This approach values face-to-face opportunities for individualized questioning and immediate referral. CONCLUSIONS: The information-providing approach is associated with confidential telephone support lines and the information-gathering approach with clinical services. The approach adopted online will depend on ethos and the range of services provided. Effective transition from online to clinic services after disclosure is an essential element of this process and further research is needed to understand and support this transition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5331185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53311852017-03-13 Screening for Child Sexual Exploitation in Online Sexual Health Services: An Exploratory Study of Expert Views Spencer-Hughes, Victoria Syred, Jonathan Allison, Alison Holdsworth, Gillian Baraitser, Paula J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Sexual health services routinely screen for child sexual exploitation (CSE). Although sexual health services are increasingly provided online, there has been no research on the translation of the safeguarding function to online services. We studied expert practitioner views on safeguarding in this context. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to document expert practitioner views on safeguarding in the context of an online sexual health service. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with lead professionals purposively sampled from local, regional, or national organizations with a direct influence over CSE protocols, child protection policies, and sexual health services. Interviews were analyzed by three researchers using a matrix-based analytic method. RESULTS: Our respondents described two different approaches to safeguarding. The “information-providing” approach considers that young people experiencing CSE will ask for help when they are ready from someone they trust. The primary function of the service is to provide information, provoke reflection, generate trust, and respond reliably to disclosure. The approach values online services as an anonymous space to test out disclosure without commitment. The “information-gathering” approach considers that young people may withhold information about exploitation. Therefore, services should seek out information to assess risk and initiate disclosure. This approach values face-to-face opportunities for individualized questioning and immediate referral. CONCLUSIONS: The information-providing approach is associated with confidential telephone support lines and the information-gathering approach with clinical services. The approach adopted online will depend on ethos and the range of services provided. Effective transition from online to clinic services after disclosure is an essential element of this process and further research is needed to understand and support this transition. JMIR Publications 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5331185/ /pubmed/28196790 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5911 Text en ©Victoria Spencer-Hughes, Jonathan Syred, Alison Allison, Gillian Holdsworth, Paula Baraitser. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.02.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Spencer-Hughes, Victoria
Syred, Jonathan
Allison, Alison
Holdsworth, Gillian
Baraitser, Paula
Screening for Child Sexual Exploitation in Online Sexual Health Services: An Exploratory Study of Expert Views
title Screening for Child Sexual Exploitation in Online Sexual Health Services: An Exploratory Study of Expert Views
title_full Screening for Child Sexual Exploitation in Online Sexual Health Services: An Exploratory Study of Expert Views
title_fullStr Screening for Child Sexual Exploitation in Online Sexual Health Services: An Exploratory Study of Expert Views
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Child Sexual Exploitation in Online Sexual Health Services: An Exploratory Study of Expert Views
title_short Screening for Child Sexual Exploitation in Online Sexual Health Services: An Exploratory Study of Expert Views
title_sort screening for child sexual exploitation in online sexual health services: an exploratory study of expert views
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196790
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5911
work_keys_str_mv AT spencerhughesvictoria screeningforchildsexualexploitationinonlinesexualhealthservicesanexploratorystudyofexpertviews
AT syredjonathan screeningforchildsexualexploitationinonlinesexualhealthservicesanexploratorystudyofexpertviews
AT allisonalison screeningforchildsexualexploitationinonlinesexualhealthservicesanexploratorystudyofexpertviews
AT holdsworthgillian screeningforchildsexualexploitationinonlinesexualhealthservicesanexploratorystudyofexpertviews
AT baraitserpaula screeningforchildsexualexploitationinonlinesexualhealthservicesanexploratorystudyofexpertviews