Cargando…
Binding Pose Flip Explained via Enthalpic and Entropic Contributions
[Image: see text] The anomalous binding modes of five highly similar fragments of TIE2 inhibitors, showing three distinct binding poses, are investigated. We report a quantitative rationalization for the changes in binding pose based on molecular dynamics simulations. We investigated five fragments...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical
Society
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28079371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00483 |
_version_ | 1782511381454520320 |
---|---|
author | Schauperl, Michael Czodrowski, Paul Fuchs, Julian E. Huber, Roland G. Waldner, Birgit J. Podewitz, Maren Kramer, Christian Liedl, Klaus R. |
author_facet | Schauperl, Michael Czodrowski, Paul Fuchs, Julian E. Huber, Roland G. Waldner, Birgit J. Podewitz, Maren Kramer, Christian Liedl, Klaus R. |
author_sort | Schauperl, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The anomalous binding modes of five highly similar fragments of TIE2 inhibitors, showing three distinct binding poses, are investigated. We report a quantitative rationalization for the changes in binding pose based on molecular dynamics simulations. We investigated five fragments in complex with the transforming growth factor β receptor type 1 kinase domain. Analyses of these simulations using Grid Inhomogeneous Solvation Theory (GIST), pK(A) calculations, and a tool to investigate enthalpic differences upon binding unraveled the various thermodynamic contributions to the different binding modes. While one binding mode flip can be rationalized by steric repulsion, the second binding pose flip revealed a different protonation state for one of the ligands, leading to different enthalpic and entropic contributions to the binding free energy. One binding pose is stabilized by the displacement of entropically unfavored water molecules (binding pose determined by solvation entropy), ligands in the other binding pose are stabilized by strong enthalpic interactions, overcompensating the unfavorable water entropy in this pose (binding pose determined by enthalpic interactions). This analysis elucidates unprecedented details determining the flipping of the binding modes, which can elegantly explain the experimental findings for this system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5331458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | American Chemical
Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53314582017-03-02 Binding Pose Flip Explained via Enthalpic and Entropic Contributions Schauperl, Michael Czodrowski, Paul Fuchs, Julian E. Huber, Roland G. Waldner, Birgit J. Podewitz, Maren Kramer, Christian Liedl, Klaus R. J Chem Inf Model [Image: see text] The anomalous binding modes of five highly similar fragments of TIE2 inhibitors, showing three distinct binding poses, are investigated. We report a quantitative rationalization for the changes in binding pose based on molecular dynamics simulations. We investigated five fragments in complex with the transforming growth factor β receptor type 1 kinase domain. Analyses of these simulations using Grid Inhomogeneous Solvation Theory (GIST), pK(A) calculations, and a tool to investigate enthalpic differences upon binding unraveled the various thermodynamic contributions to the different binding modes. While one binding mode flip can be rationalized by steric repulsion, the second binding pose flip revealed a different protonation state for one of the ligands, leading to different enthalpic and entropic contributions to the binding free energy. One binding pose is stabilized by the displacement of entropically unfavored water molecules (binding pose determined by solvation entropy), ligands in the other binding pose are stabilized by strong enthalpic interactions, overcompensating the unfavorable water entropy in this pose (binding pose determined by enthalpic interactions). This analysis elucidates unprecedented details determining the flipping of the binding modes, which can elegantly explain the experimental findings for this system. American Chemical Society 2017-01-12 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5331458/ /pubmed/28079371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00483 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Schauperl, Michael Czodrowski, Paul Fuchs, Julian E. Huber, Roland G. Waldner, Birgit J. Podewitz, Maren Kramer, Christian Liedl, Klaus R. Binding Pose Flip Explained via Enthalpic and Entropic Contributions |
title | Binding Pose Flip Explained via Enthalpic and Entropic
Contributions |
title_full | Binding Pose Flip Explained via Enthalpic and Entropic
Contributions |
title_fullStr | Binding Pose Flip Explained via Enthalpic and Entropic
Contributions |
title_full_unstemmed | Binding Pose Flip Explained via Enthalpic and Entropic
Contributions |
title_short | Binding Pose Flip Explained via Enthalpic and Entropic
Contributions |
title_sort | binding pose flip explained via enthalpic and entropic
contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28079371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00483 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schauperlmichael bindingposeflipexplainedviaenthalpicandentropiccontributions AT czodrowskipaul bindingposeflipexplainedviaenthalpicandentropiccontributions AT fuchsjuliane bindingposeflipexplainedviaenthalpicandentropiccontributions AT huberrolandg bindingposeflipexplainedviaenthalpicandentropiccontributions AT waldnerbirgitj bindingposeflipexplainedviaenthalpicandentropiccontributions AT podewitzmaren bindingposeflipexplainedviaenthalpicandentropiccontributions AT kramerchristian bindingposeflipexplainedviaenthalpicandentropiccontributions AT liedlklausr bindingposeflipexplainedviaenthalpicandentropiccontributions |