Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults in Uganda

This study sought to develop and validate a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire (GNKQ) for Ugandan adults. The initial draft consisted of 133 items on five constructs associated with nutrition knowledge; expert recommendations (16 items), food groups (70 items), selecting food (10 items), nutr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bukenya, Richard, Ahmed, Abhiya, Andrade, Jeanette M., Grigsby-Toussaint, Diana S., Muyonga, John, Andrade, Juan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28230779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9020172
_version_ 1782511411638829056
author Bukenya, Richard
Ahmed, Abhiya
Andrade, Jeanette M.
Grigsby-Toussaint, Diana S.
Muyonga, John
Andrade, Juan E.
author_facet Bukenya, Richard
Ahmed, Abhiya
Andrade, Jeanette M.
Grigsby-Toussaint, Diana S.
Muyonga, John
Andrade, Juan E.
author_sort Bukenya, Richard
collection PubMed
description This study sought to develop and validate a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire (GNKQ) for Ugandan adults. The initial draft consisted of 133 items on five constructs associated with nutrition knowledge; expert recommendations (16 items), food groups (70 items), selecting food (10 items), nutrition and disease relationship (23 items), and food fortification in Uganda (14 items). The questionnaire validity was evaluated in three studies. For the content validity (study 1), a panel of five content matter nutrition experts reviewed the GNKQ draft before and after face validity. For the face validity (study 2), head teachers and health workers (n = 27) completed the questionnaire before attending one of three focus groups to review the clarity of the items. For the construct and test-rest reliability (study 3), head teachers (n = 40) from private and public primary schools and nutrition (n = 52) and engineering (n = 49) students from Makerere University took the questionnaire twice (two weeks apart). Experts agreed (content validity index, CVI > 0.9; reliability, Gwet’s AC1 > 0.85) that all constructs were relevant to evaluate nutrition knowledge. After the focus groups, 29 items were identified as unclear, requiring major (n = 5) and minor (n = 24) reviews. The final questionnaire had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach α > 0.95), test-retest reliability (r = 0.89), and differentiated (p < 0.001) nutrition knowledge scores between nutrition (67 ± 5) and engineering (39 ± 11) students. Only the construct on nutrition recommendations was unreliable (Cronbach α = 0.51, test-retest r = 0.55), which requires further optimization. The final questionnaire included topics on food groups (41 items), selecting food (2 items), nutrition and disease relationship (14 items), and food fortification in Uganda (22 items) and had good content, construct, and test-retest reliability to evaluate nutrition knowledge among Ugandan adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5331603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53316032017-03-13 Validity and Reliability of General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults in Uganda Bukenya, Richard Ahmed, Abhiya Andrade, Jeanette M. Grigsby-Toussaint, Diana S. Muyonga, John Andrade, Juan E. Nutrients Article This study sought to develop and validate a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire (GNKQ) for Ugandan adults. The initial draft consisted of 133 items on five constructs associated with nutrition knowledge; expert recommendations (16 items), food groups (70 items), selecting food (10 items), nutrition and disease relationship (23 items), and food fortification in Uganda (14 items). The questionnaire validity was evaluated in three studies. For the content validity (study 1), a panel of five content matter nutrition experts reviewed the GNKQ draft before and after face validity. For the face validity (study 2), head teachers and health workers (n = 27) completed the questionnaire before attending one of three focus groups to review the clarity of the items. For the construct and test-rest reliability (study 3), head teachers (n = 40) from private and public primary schools and nutrition (n = 52) and engineering (n = 49) students from Makerere University took the questionnaire twice (two weeks apart). Experts agreed (content validity index, CVI > 0.9; reliability, Gwet’s AC1 > 0.85) that all constructs were relevant to evaluate nutrition knowledge. After the focus groups, 29 items were identified as unclear, requiring major (n = 5) and minor (n = 24) reviews. The final questionnaire had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach α > 0.95), test-retest reliability (r = 0.89), and differentiated (p < 0.001) nutrition knowledge scores between nutrition (67 ± 5) and engineering (39 ± 11) students. Only the construct on nutrition recommendations was unreliable (Cronbach α = 0.51, test-retest r = 0.55), which requires further optimization. The final questionnaire included topics on food groups (41 items), selecting food (2 items), nutrition and disease relationship (14 items), and food fortification in Uganda (22 items) and had good content, construct, and test-retest reliability to evaluate nutrition knowledge among Ugandan adults. MDPI 2017-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5331603/ /pubmed/28230779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9020172 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bukenya, Richard
Ahmed, Abhiya
Andrade, Jeanette M.
Grigsby-Toussaint, Diana S.
Muyonga, John
Andrade, Juan E.
Validity and Reliability of General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults in Uganda
title Validity and Reliability of General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults in Uganda
title_full Validity and Reliability of General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults in Uganda
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults in Uganda
title_short Validity and Reliability of General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults in Uganda
title_sort validity and reliability of general nutrition knowledge questionnaire for adults in uganda
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28230779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9020172
work_keys_str_mv AT bukenyarichard validityandreliabilityofgeneralnutritionknowledgequestionnaireforadultsinuganda
AT ahmedabhiya validityandreliabilityofgeneralnutritionknowledgequestionnaireforadultsinuganda
AT andradejeanettem validityandreliabilityofgeneralnutritionknowledgequestionnaireforadultsinuganda
AT grigsbytoussaintdianas validityandreliabilityofgeneralnutritionknowledgequestionnaireforadultsinuganda
AT muyongajohn validityandreliabilityofgeneralnutritionknowledgequestionnaireforadultsinuganda
AT andradejuane validityandreliabilityofgeneralnutritionknowledgequestionnaireforadultsinuganda