Cargando…

A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures

BACKGROUND: UK Hospital Episode Statistics 2013–2014 recorded 57,286 fractures of the lower limb including the ankle. This figure is expected to continue to increase due to a greater population of older adults. Following an ankle fracture, patients usually have their ankle immobilised with a plaster...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kearney, Rebecca S., Parsons, Nick, Mistry, Dipesh, Young, Jonathan, Brown, Jaclyn, O’Beirne-Elliman, Joanne, Costa, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0125-z
_version_ 1782511429812748288
author Kearney, Rebecca S.
Parsons, Nick
Mistry, Dipesh
Young, Jonathan
Brown, Jaclyn
O’Beirne-Elliman, Joanne
Costa, Matthew
author_facet Kearney, Rebecca S.
Parsons, Nick
Mistry, Dipesh
Young, Jonathan
Brown, Jaclyn
O’Beirne-Elliman, Joanne
Costa, Matthew
author_sort Kearney, Rebecca S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: UK Hospital Episode Statistics 2013–2014 recorded 57,286 fractures of the lower limb including the ankle. This figure is expected to continue to increase due to a greater population of older adults. Following an ankle fracture, patients usually have their ankle immobilised with a plaster cast. This provides maximum support for the healing ankle but is associated with stiffness and muscle wasting. A Cochrane Review has concluded that functional bracing may reduce muscle wasting and speed recovery of ankle movement. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial in adults with an ankle fracture followed by functional bracing and exercises versus standard plaster cast care. METHODS: This is a single-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial. All patients with a fractured ankle are potentially eligible. The trial will employ 1:1 random allocation, stratified by age and non-operative/operative management. Baseline demographic and pre-injury functional data, the Manchester-Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) will be collected alongside the EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L health-related quality of life questionnaire. A research associate will perform a clinical assessment and obtain X-rays in 6 weeks and 6 months post randomisation to record complications. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life will be collected in 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: This feasibility trial will provide authoritative high-quality evidence to inform the design of a definitive trial in this important area. TRIAL REGISTRATION, SPONSORSHIP AND FUNDING: This study is registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN17809322), assigned 5 November 2015 and approved by the NRES Committee (The Black Country, 15/WM/0340), protocol version 2.0 (17 November 2015). It is co-sponsored by the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust and University of Warwick and funded by the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (PB-PG-0614-34009). The trial sponsors have no direct involvement in any aspects of study design, conduct or decision to submit the report for publication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40814-017-0125-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5331699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53316992017-03-06 A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures Kearney, Rebecca S. Parsons, Nick Mistry, Dipesh Young, Jonathan Brown, Jaclyn O’Beirne-Elliman, Joanne Costa, Matthew Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: UK Hospital Episode Statistics 2013–2014 recorded 57,286 fractures of the lower limb including the ankle. This figure is expected to continue to increase due to a greater population of older adults. Following an ankle fracture, patients usually have their ankle immobilised with a plaster cast. This provides maximum support for the healing ankle but is associated with stiffness and muscle wasting. A Cochrane Review has concluded that functional bracing may reduce muscle wasting and speed recovery of ankle movement. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial in adults with an ankle fracture followed by functional bracing and exercises versus standard plaster cast care. METHODS: This is a single-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial. All patients with a fractured ankle are potentially eligible. The trial will employ 1:1 random allocation, stratified by age and non-operative/operative management. Baseline demographic and pre-injury functional data, the Manchester-Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) will be collected alongside the EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L health-related quality of life questionnaire. A research associate will perform a clinical assessment and obtain X-rays in 6 weeks and 6 months post randomisation to record complications. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life will be collected in 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: This feasibility trial will provide authoritative high-quality evidence to inform the design of a definitive trial in this important area. TRIAL REGISTRATION, SPONSORSHIP AND FUNDING: This study is registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN17809322), assigned 5 November 2015 and approved by the NRES Committee (The Black Country, 15/WM/0340), protocol version 2.0 (17 November 2015). It is co-sponsored by the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust and University of Warwick and funded by the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (PB-PG-0614-34009). The trial sponsors have no direct involvement in any aspects of study design, conduct or decision to submit the report for publication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40814-017-0125-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5331699/ /pubmed/28265461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0125-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kearney, Rebecca S.
Parsons, Nick
Mistry, Dipesh
Young, Jonathan
Brown, Jaclyn
O’Beirne-Elliman, Joanne
Costa, Matthew
A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures
title A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures
title_full A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures
title_fullStr A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures
title_full_unstemmed A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures
title_short A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures
title_sort protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0125-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kearneyrebeccas aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT parsonsnick aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT mistrydipesh aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT youngjonathan aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT brownjaclyn aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT obeirneellimanjoanne aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT costamatthew aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT kearneyrebeccas protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT parsonsnick protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT mistrydipesh protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT youngjonathan protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT brownjaclyn protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT obeirneellimanjoanne protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures
AT costamatthew protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures