Cargando…
A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures
BACKGROUND: UK Hospital Episode Statistics 2013–2014 recorded 57,286 fractures of the lower limb including the ankle. This figure is expected to continue to increase due to a greater population of older adults. Following an ankle fracture, patients usually have their ankle immobilised with a plaster...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0125-z |
_version_ | 1782511429812748288 |
---|---|
author | Kearney, Rebecca S. Parsons, Nick Mistry, Dipesh Young, Jonathan Brown, Jaclyn O’Beirne-Elliman, Joanne Costa, Matthew |
author_facet | Kearney, Rebecca S. Parsons, Nick Mistry, Dipesh Young, Jonathan Brown, Jaclyn O’Beirne-Elliman, Joanne Costa, Matthew |
author_sort | Kearney, Rebecca S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: UK Hospital Episode Statistics 2013–2014 recorded 57,286 fractures of the lower limb including the ankle. This figure is expected to continue to increase due to a greater population of older adults. Following an ankle fracture, patients usually have their ankle immobilised with a plaster cast. This provides maximum support for the healing ankle but is associated with stiffness and muscle wasting. A Cochrane Review has concluded that functional bracing may reduce muscle wasting and speed recovery of ankle movement. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial in adults with an ankle fracture followed by functional bracing and exercises versus standard plaster cast care. METHODS: This is a single-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial. All patients with a fractured ankle are potentially eligible. The trial will employ 1:1 random allocation, stratified by age and non-operative/operative management. Baseline demographic and pre-injury functional data, the Manchester-Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) will be collected alongside the EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L health-related quality of life questionnaire. A research associate will perform a clinical assessment and obtain X-rays in 6 weeks and 6 months post randomisation to record complications. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life will be collected in 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: This feasibility trial will provide authoritative high-quality evidence to inform the design of a definitive trial in this important area. TRIAL REGISTRATION, SPONSORSHIP AND FUNDING: This study is registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN17809322), assigned 5 November 2015 and approved by the NRES Committee (The Black Country, 15/WM/0340), protocol version 2.0 (17 November 2015). It is co-sponsored by the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust and University of Warwick and funded by the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (PB-PG-0614-34009). The trial sponsors have no direct involvement in any aspects of study design, conduct or decision to submit the report for publication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40814-017-0125-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5331699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53316992017-03-06 A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures Kearney, Rebecca S. Parsons, Nick Mistry, Dipesh Young, Jonathan Brown, Jaclyn O’Beirne-Elliman, Joanne Costa, Matthew Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: UK Hospital Episode Statistics 2013–2014 recorded 57,286 fractures of the lower limb including the ankle. This figure is expected to continue to increase due to a greater population of older adults. Following an ankle fracture, patients usually have their ankle immobilised with a plaster cast. This provides maximum support for the healing ankle but is associated with stiffness and muscle wasting. A Cochrane Review has concluded that functional bracing may reduce muscle wasting and speed recovery of ankle movement. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial in adults with an ankle fracture followed by functional bracing and exercises versus standard plaster cast care. METHODS: This is a single-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial. All patients with a fractured ankle are potentially eligible. The trial will employ 1:1 random allocation, stratified by age and non-operative/operative management. Baseline demographic and pre-injury functional data, the Manchester-Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) will be collected alongside the EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L health-related quality of life questionnaire. A research associate will perform a clinical assessment and obtain X-rays in 6 weeks and 6 months post randomisation to record complications. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life will be collected in 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: This feasibility trial will provide authoritative high-quality evidence to inform the design of a definitive trial in this important area. TRIAL REGISTRATION, SPONSORSHIP AND FUNDING: This study is registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN17809322), assigned 5 November 2015 and approved by the NRES Committee (The Black Country, 15/WM/0340), protocol version 2.0 (17 November 2015). It is co-sponsored by the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust and University of Warwick and funded by the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (PB-PG-0614-34009). The trial sponsors have no direct involvement in any aspects of study design, conduct or decision to submit the report for publication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40814-017-0125-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5331699/ /pubmed/28265461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0125-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Kearney, Rebecca S. Parsons, Nick Mistry, Dipesh Young, Jonathan Brown, Jaclyn O’Beirne-Elliman, Joanne Costa, Matthew A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures |
title | A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures |
title_full | A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures |
title_fullStr | A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures |
title_short | A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures |
title_sort | protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5331699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0125-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kearneyrebeccas aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT parsonsnick aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT mistrydipesh aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT youngjonathan aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT brownjaclyn aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT obeirneellimanjoanne aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT costamatthew aprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT kearneyrebeccas protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT parsonsnick protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT mistrydipesh protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT youngjonathan protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT brownjaclyn protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT obeirneellimanjoanne protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures AT costamatthew protocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoassessthedifferencebetweenfunctionalbracingandplastercastforthetreatmentofanklefractures |