Cargando…
The continuing legacy of nature versus nurture in biolinguistics
Theories of language evolution that separate biological and cultural contributions perpetuate a false dichotomy between nature and nurture. The explanatory power of future theories will depend on acknowledging the reality of gene–culture interaction and how it makes language possible.
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28120321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1202-7 |
| _version_ | 1782511683713892352 |
|---|---|
| author | Bowling, Daniel L. |
| author_facet | Bowling, Daniel L. |
| author_sort | Bowling, Daniel L. |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | Theories of language evolution that separate biological and cultural contributions perpetuate a false dichotomy between nature and nurture. The explanatory power of future theories will depend on acknowledging the reality of gene–culture interaction and how it makes language possible. |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-5333347 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Springer US |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-53333472017-03-15 The continuing legacy of nature versus nurture in biolinguistics Bowling, Daniel L. Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report Theories of language evolution that separate biological and cultural contributions perpetuate a false dichotomy between nature and nurture. The explanatory power of future theories will depend on acknowledging the reality of gene–culture interaction and how it makes language possible. Springer US 2017-01-24 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5333347/ /pubmed/28120321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1202-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
| spellingShingle | Brief Report Bowling, Daniel L. The continuing legacy of nature versus nurture in biolinguistics |
| title | The continuing legacy of nature versus nurture in biolinguistics |
| title_full | The continuing legacy of nature versus nurture in biolinguistics |
| title_fullStr | The continuing legacy of nature versus nurture in biolinguistics |
| title_full_unstemmed | The continuing legacy of nature versus nurture in biolinguistics |
| title_short | The continuing legacy of nature versus nurture in biolinguistics |
| title_sort | continuing legacy of nature versus nurture in biolinguistics |
| topic | Brief Report |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28120321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1202-7 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bowlingdaniell thecontinuinglegacyofnatureversusnurtureinbiolinguistics AT bowlingdaniell continuinglegacyofnatureversusnurtureinbiolinguistics |