Cargando…
How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions?
The 16S rRNA gene has been used as master key for studying prokaryotic diversity in almost every environment. Despite the claim of several researchers to have the best universal primers, the reality is that no primer has been demonstrated to be truly universal. This suggests that conserved regions o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265511 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3036 |
_version_ | 1782511731727138816 |
---|---|
author | Martinez-Porchas, Marcel Villalpando-Canchola, Enrique Ortiz Suarez, Luis Enrique Vargas-Albores, Francisco |
author_facet | Martinez-Porchas, Marcel Villalpando-Canchola, Enrique Ortiz Suarez, Luis Enrique Vargas-Albores, Francisco |
author_sort | Martinez-Porchas, Marcel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The 16S rRNA gene has been used as master key for studying prokaryotic diversity in almost every environment. Despite the claim of several researchers to have the best universal primers, the reality is that no primer has been demonstrated to be truly universal. This suggests that conserved regions of the gene may not be as conserved as expected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the conservation degree of the so-called conserved regions flanking the hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Data contained in SILVA database (release 123) were used for the study. Primers reported as matches of each conserved region were assembled to form contigs; sequences sizing 12 nucleotides (12-mers) were extracted from these contigs and searched into the entire set of SILVA sequences. Frequency analysis shown that extreme regions, 1 and 10, registered the lowest frequencies. 12-mer frequencies revealed segments of contigs that were not as conserved as expected (≤90%). Fragments corresponding to the primer contigs 3, 4, 5b and 6a were recovered from all sequences in SILVA database. Nucleotide frequency analysis in each consensus demonstrated that only a small fraction of these so-called conserved regions is truly conserved in non-redundant sequences. It could be concluded that conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene exhibit considerable variation that has to be considered when using this gene as biomarker. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5333541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53335412017-03-06 How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions? Martinez-Porchas, Marcel Villalpando-Canchola, Enrique Ortiz Suarez, Luis Enrique Vargas-Albores, Francisco PeerJ Biodiversity The 16S rRNA gene has been used as master key for studying prokaryotic diversity in almost every environment. Despite the claim of several researchers to have the best universal primers, the reality is that no primer has been demonstrated to be truly universal. This suggests that conserved regions of the gene may not be as conserved as expected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the conservation degree of the so-called conserved regions flanking the hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Data contained in SILVA database (release 123) were used for the study. Primers reported as matches of each conserved region were assembled to form contigs; sequences sizing 12 nucleotides (12-mers) were extracted from these contigs and searched into the entire set of SILVA sequences. Frequency analysis shown that extreme regions, 1 and 10, registered the lowest frequencies. 12-mer frequencies revealed segments of contigs that were not as conserved as expected (≤90%). Fragments corresponding to the primer contigs 3, 4, 5b and 6a were recovered from all sequences in SILVA database. Nucleotide frequency analysis in each consensus demonstrated that only a small fraction of these so-called conserved regions is truly conserved in non-redundant sequences. It could be concluded that conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene exhibit considerable variation that has to be considered when using this gene as biomarker. PeerJ Inc. 2017-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5333541/ /pubmed/28265511 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3036 Text en ©2017 Martinez-Porchas et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Biodiversity Martinez-Porchas, Marcel Villalpando-Canchola, Enrique Ortiz Suarez, Luis Enrique Vargas-Albores, Francisco How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions? |
title | How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions? |
title_full | How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions? |
title_fullStr | How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions? |
title_full_unstemmed | How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions? |
title_short | How conserved are the conserved 16S-rRNA regions? |
title_sort | how conserved are the conserved 16s-rrna regions? |
topic | Biodiversity |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265511 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinezporchasmarcel howconservedaretheconserved16srrnaregions AT villalpandocancholaenrique howconservedaretheconserved16srrnaregions AT ortizsuarezluisenrique howconservedaretheconserved16srrnaregions AT vargasalboresfrancisco howconservedaretheconserved16srrnaregions |