Cargando…

Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat

In the face of increasing threats to biodiversity, the advancement of methods for surveying biological communities is a major priority for ecologists. Recent advances in molecular biological technologies have made it possible to detect and sequence DNA from environmental samples (environmental DNA o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Donnell, James L., Kelly, Ryan P., Shelton, Andrew Olaf, Samhouri, Jameal F., Lowell, Natalie C., Williams, Gregory D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265513
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3044
_version_ 1782511733618769920
author O’Donnell, James L.
Kelly, Ryan P.
Shelton, Andrew Olaf
Samhouri, Jameal F.
Lowell, Natalie C.
Williams, Gregory D.
author_facet O’Donnell, James L.
Kelly, Ryan P.
Shelton, Andrew Olaf
Samhouri, Jameal F.
Lowell, Natalie C.
Williams, Gregory D.
author_sort O’Donnell, James L.
collection PubMed
description In the face of increasing threats to biodiversity, the advancement of methods for surveying biological communities is a major priority for ecologists. Recent advances in molecular biological technologies have made it possible to detect and sequence DNA from environmental samples (environmental DNA or eDNA); however, eDNA techniques have not yet seen widespread adoption as a routine method for biological surveillance primarily due to gaps in our understanding of the dynamics of eDNA in space and time. In order to identify the effective spatial scale of this approach in a dynamic marine environment, we collected marine surface water samples from transects ranging from the intertidal zone to four kilometers from shore. Using PCR primers that target a diverse assemblage of metazoans, we amplified a region of mitochondrial 16S rDNA from the samples and sequenced the products on an Illumina platform in order to detect communities and quantify their spatial patterns using a variety of statistical tools. We find evidence for multiple, discrete eDNA communities in this habitat, and show that these communities decrease in similarity as they become further apart. Offshore communities tend to be richer but less even than those inshore, though diversity was not spatially autocorrelated. Taxon-specific relative abundance coincided with our expectations of spatial distribution in taxa lacking a microscopic, pelagic life-history stage, though most of the taxa detected do not meet these criteria. Finally, we use carefully replicated laboratory procedures to show that laboratory treatments were remarkably similar in most cases, while allowing us to detect a faulty replicate, emphasizing the importance of replication to metabarcoding studies. While there is much work to be done before eDNA techniques can be confidently deployed as a standard method for ecological monitoring, this study serves as a first analysis of diversity at the fine spatial scales relevant to marine ecologists and confirms the promise of eDNA in dynamic environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5333549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53335492017-03-06 Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat O’Donnell, James L. Kelly, Ryan P. Shelton, Andrew Olaf Samhouri, Jameal F. Lowell, Natalie C. Williams, Gregory D. PeerJ Biodiversity In the face of increasing threats to biodiversity, the advancement of methods for surveying biological communities is a major priority for ecologists. Recent advances in molecular biological technologies have made it possible to detect and sequence DNA from environmental samples (environmental DNA or eDNA); however, eDNA techniques have not yet seen widespread adoption as a routine method for biological surveillance primarily due to gaps in our understanding of the dynamics of eDNA in space and time. In order to identify the effective spatial scale of this approach in a dynamic marine environment, we collected marine surface water samples from transects ranging from the intertidal zone to four kilometers from shore. Using PCR primers that target a diverse assemblage of metazoans, we amplified a region of mitochondrial 16S rDNA from the samples and sequenced the products on an Illumina platform in order to detect communities and quantify their spatial patterns using a variety of statistical tools. We find evidence for multiple, discrete eDNA communities in this habitat, and show that these communities decrease in similarity as they become further apart. Offshore communities tend to be richer but less even than those inshore, though diversity was not spatially autocorrelated. Taxon-specific relative abundance coincided with our expectations of spatial distribution in taxa lacking a microscopic, pelagic life-history stage, though most of the taxa detected do not meet these criteria. Finally, we use carefully replicated laboratory procedures to show that laboratory treatments were remarkably similar in most cases, while allowing us to detect a faulty replicate, emphasizing the importance of replication to metabarcoding studies. While there is much work to be done before eDNA techniques can be confidently deployed as a standard method for ecological monitoring, this study serves as a first analysis of diversity at the fine spatial scales relevant to marine ecologists and confirms the promise of eDNA in dynamic environments. PeerJ Inc. 2017-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5333549/ /pubmed/28265513 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3044 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, made available under the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) . This work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
O’Donnell, James L.
Kelly, Ryan P.
Shelton, Andrew Olaf
Samhouri, Jameal F.
Lowell, Natalie C.
Williams, Gregory D.
Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat
title Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat
title_full Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat
title_fullStr Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat
title_full_unstemmed Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat
title_short Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat
title_sort spatial distribution of environmental dna in a nearshore marine habitat
topic Biodiversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265513
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3044
work_keys_str_mv AT odonnelljamesl spatialdistributionofenvironmentaldnainanearshoremarinehabitat
AT kellyryanp spatialdistributionofenvironmentaldnainanearshoremarinehabitat
AT sheltonandrewolaf spatialdistributionofenvironmentaldnainanearshoremarinehabitat
AT samhourijamealf spatialdistributionofenvironmentaldnainanearshoremarinehabitat
AT lowellnataliec spatialdistributionofenvironmentaldnainanearshoremarinehabitat
AT williamsgregoryd spatialdistributionofenvironmentaldnainanearshoremarinehabitat