Cargando…

A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate with 0.05% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% sodium hyaluronate (SH) artificial tears compared with 0.05% cyclosporine (CS) ophthalmic solution for the treatment of dry eye. Methods: One hundred seventy-six patients were recruited and randomized to receive of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Yuli, Song, Jong Suk, Choi, Chul Young, Yoon, Kyung Chul, Lee, Hyung Keun, Kim, Hyun Seung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27929721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2016.0086
_version_ 1782511735214702592
author Park, Yuli
Song, Jong Suk
Choi, Chul Young
Yoon, Kyung Chul
Lee, Hyung Keun
Kim, Hyun Seung
author_facet Park, Yuli
Song, Jong Suk
Choi, Chul Young
Yoon, Kyung Chul
Lee, Hyung Keun
Kim, Hyun Seung
author_sort Park, Yuli
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% sodium hyaluronate (SH) artificial tears compared with 0.05% cyclosporine (CS) ophthalmic solution for the treatment of dry eye. Methods: One hundred seventy-six patients were recruited and randomized to receive of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH and 0.05% CS. There was a primary end point which is the changes in the fluorescein corneal staining (FCS) score to determine noninferiority of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH. Secondary objective end points were lissamine green conjunctival staining (LGCS) scores, Schirmer test, and tear film break-up time (TBUT). Secondary subjective end point was ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score. These were evaluated before treatment and 6 and 12 weeks after start of treatment. Results: In the primary analysis, the mean change from baseline in FCS scores verified noninferiority of 0.1% and 0.15% SH to 0.05% CS and also indicated significant improvement of all groups (P < 0.05). Values for TBUT, LGCS scores, and OSDI scores showed significant improvements in all groups (P < 0.05), although no significant intergroup difference was shown. However, Schirmer test scores in the 0.15% SH group showed a significant tendency for better improvement at week 12 compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Administration of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH was effective in improving both the objective signs and subjective symptoms of dry eye. Those findings, in addition to the well-tolerated profile of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH, show that it is effective therapeutic method for dry eye.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5333559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53335592017-03-13 A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate with 0.05% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye Park, Yuli Song, Jong Suk Choi, Chul Young Yoon, Kyung Chul Lee, Hyung Keun Kim, Hyun Seung J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Original Articles Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% sodium hyaluronate (SH) artificial tears compared with 0.05% cyclosporine (CS) ophthalmic solution for the treatment of dry eye. Methods: One hundred seventy-six patients were recruited and randomized to receive of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH and 0.05% CS. There was a primary end point which is the changes in the fluorescein corneal staining (FCS) score to determine noninferiority of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH. Secondary objective end points were lissamine green conjunctival staining (LGCS) scores, Schirmer test, and tear film break-up time (TBUT). Secondary subjective end point was ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score. These were evaluated before treatment and 6 and 12 weeks after start of treatment. Results: In the primary analysis, the mean change from baseline in FCS scores verified noninferiority of 0.1% and 0.15% SH to 0.05% CS and also indicated significant improvement of all groups (P < 0.05). Values for TBUT, LGCS scores, and OSDI scores showed significant improvements in all groups (P < 0.05), although no significant intergroup difference was shown. However, Schirmer test scores in the 0.15% SH group showed a significant tendency for better improvement at week 12 compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Administration of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH was effective in improving both the objective signs and subjective symptoms of dry eye. Those findings, in addition to the well-tolerated profile of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH, show that it is effective therapeutic method for dry eye. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017-03-01 2017-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5333559/ /pubmed/27929721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2016.0086 Text en © Yuli Park, et al., 2016; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Park, Yuli
Song, Jong Suk
Choi, Chul Young
Yoon, Kyung Chul
Lee, Hyung Keun
Kim, Hyun Seung
A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate with 0.05% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye
title A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate with 0.05% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye
title_full A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate with 0.05% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye
title_fullStr A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate with 0.05% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate with 0.05% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye
title_short A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate with 0.05% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye
title_sort randomized multicenter study comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% sodium hyaluronate with 0.05% cyclosporine in the treatment of dry eye
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27929721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2016.0086
work_keys_str_mv AT parkyuli arandomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT songjongsuk arandomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT choichulyoung arandomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT yoonkyungchul arandomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT leehyungkeun arandomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT kimhyunseung arandomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT parkyuli randomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT songjongsuk randomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT choichulyoung randomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT yoonkyungchul randomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT leehyungkeun randomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye
AT kimhyunseung randomizedmulticenterstudycomparing01015and03sodiumhyaluronatewith005cyclosporineinthetreatmentofdryeye