Cargando…

Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy

Aim. The aim of this study was to assess whether significant meniscal extrusion of more than 3 mm or of even lesser degrees of extrusion could be considered significant. We also aimed to determine the morphology of tears that are most likely to be associated with significant extrusion. Study design...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muzaffar, N, Kirmani, O, Ahsan, M, Ahmad, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435604
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1507.013
_version_ 1782511750927613952
author Muzaffar, N
Kirmani, O
Ahsan, M
Ahmad, S
author_facet Muzaffar, N
Kirmani, O
Ahsan, M
Ahmad, S
author_sort Muzaffar, N
collection PubMed
description Aim. The aim of this study was to assess whether significant meniscal extrusion of more than 3 mm or of even lesser degrees of extrusion could be considered significant. We also aimed to determine the morphology of tears that are most likely to be associated with significant extrusion. Study design and material. The study was done retrospectively on a group of 202 patients (157 males and 45 females) who had been seen in our hospital between 2007 and 2011 with meniscal tears (in one knee only) diagnosed by MRI and confirmed on arthroscopy. Extrusion of 3 mm or more (usually considered significant) was seen in 102 cases and less than 3 mm in 100. Extrusion was measured on the coronal MR images rather than on saggital images because of ease and reproducibility. The tears were confirmed by arthroscopy and correlated with the extent of extrusion on MRI. Results: Out of the total of 202 cases, 102 cases (50.5%) had extrusion of 3 mm or more on MRI. Of these, the medial meniscal posterior horn tears accounted for 63 cases (64.26%), 21 cases were medial meniscal body tears (21.42%), five medial meniscal root tears (5.1%), nine lateral meniscal body tears (9.18%) and four lateral meniscal posterior horn tears(4.08%). Forty-four cases had extrusion of 3-4 mm, 26 had extrusion of 4-5mm, 17 cases had extrusion of 5-6mm, ten had extrusion of 6-7mm and five had extrusion of 7 mm or more. One hundred cases fell in the < 3mm extrusion category, of which 80 (39.6%) were in the 2-3 mm extrusion group and 20 (9.9%) in the 1-2 mm extrusion group. They comprised of 61 cases of medial meniscal posterior horn tears, 23 cases of medial meniscal body tears, six medial meniscal root tears, eight lateral meniscal body tears and two lateral meniscal posterior horn tears. The highest proportion of meniscal tears was seen in the 2-3 mm category comprising nearly 40% of the entire study group. The majority of tears were medial meniscal posterior horn tears. Conclusion: Menisci that extruded 2-3 mm from the tibial margin formed a major proportion of menisci treated for tears by repair or menisectomy. We should consider extrusion of more than 2mm as significant. Most tears had extrusion of 2-4 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5333659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53336592017-04-21 Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy Muzaffar, N Kirmani, O Ahsan, M Ahmad, S Malays Orthop J Original Article Aim. The aim of this study was to assess whether significant meniscal extrusion of more than 3 mm or of even lesser degrees of extrusion could be considered significant. We also aimed to determine the morphology of tears that are most likely to be associated with significant extrusion. Study design and material. The study was done retrospectively on a group of 202 patients (157 males and 45 females) who had been seen in our hospital between 2007 and 2011 with meniscal tears (in one knee only) diagnosed by MRI and confirmed on arthroscopy. Extrusion of 3 mm or more (usually considered significant) was seen in 102 cases and less than 3 mm in 100. Extrusion was measured on the coronal MR images rather than on saggital images because of ease and reproducibility. The tears were confirmed by arthroscopy and correlated with the extent of extrusion on MRI. Results: Out of the total of 202 cases, 102 cases (50.5%) had extrusion of 3 mm or more on MRI. Of these, the medial meniscal posterior horn tears accounted for 63 cases (64.26%), 21 cases were medial meniscal body tears (21.42%), five medial meniscal root tears (5.1%), nine lateral meniscal body tears (9.18%) and four lateral meniscal posterior horn tears(4.08%). Forty-four cases had extrusion of 3-4 mm, 26 had extrusion of 4-5mm, 17 cases had extrusion of 5-6mm, ten had extrusion of 6-7mm and five had extrusion of 7 mm or more. One hundred cases fell in the < 3mm extrusion category, of which 80 (39.6%) were in the 2-3 mm extrusion group and 20 (9.9%) in the 1-2 mm extrusion group. They comprised of 61 cases of medial meniscal posterior horn tears, 23 cases of medial meniscal body tears, six medial meniscal root tears, eight lateral meniscal body tears and two lateral meniscal posterior horn tears. The highest proportion of meniscal tears was seen in the 2-3 mm category comprising nearly 40% of the entire study group. The majority of tears were medial meniscal posterior horn tears. Conclusion: Menisci that extruded 2-3 mm from the tibial margin formed a major proportion of menisci treated for tears by repair or menisectomy. We should consider extrusion of more than 2mm as significant. Most tears had extrusion of 2-4 mm. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5333659/ /pubmed/28435604 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1507.013 Text en © 2015 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA). All Rights Reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Muzaffar, N
Kirmani, O
Ahsan, M
Ahmad, S
Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy
title Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy
title_full Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy
title_fullStr Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy
title_short Meniscal Extrusion in the Knee: Should only 3 mm Extrusion be Considered Significant? An Assessment by MRI and Arthroscopy
title_sort meniscal extrusion in the knee: should only 3 mm extrusion be considered significant? an assessment by mri and arthroscopy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435604
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1507.013
work_keys_str_mv AT muzaffarn meniscalextrusioninthekneeshouldonly3mmextrusionbeconsideredsignificantanassessmentbymriandarthroscopy
AT kirmanio meniscalextrusioninthekneeshouldonly3mmextrusionbeconsideredsignificantanassessmentbymriandarthroscopy
AT ahsanm meniscalextrusioninthekneeshouldonly3mmextrusionbeconsideredsignificantanassessmentbymriandarthroscopy
AT ahmads meniscalextrusioninthekneeshouldonly3mmextrusionbeconsideredsignificantanassessmentbymriandarthroscopy