Cargando…

Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures

Introduction: A comparative evaluation of the surgical treatment and outcome of patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated with short versus long proximal femoral nail antirotation. Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raval, P, Ramasamy, A, Raza, H, Khan, K, Awan, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435543
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1603.005
_version_ 1782511758367260672
author Raval, P
Ramasamy, A
Raza, H
Khan, K
Awan, N
author_facet Raval, P
Ramasamy, A
Raza, H
Khan, K
Awan, N
author_sort Raval, P
collection PubMed
description Introduction: A comparative evaluation of the surgical treatment and outcome of patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated with short versus long proximal femoral nail antirotation. Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated between January 2011 and June 2012. In all 80 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 40 were treated with short PFNA and the remaining with long PFNA. Comparative analyses of demographic data, peri-operative outcome and complications were carried out. Results: There was no significant difference noted in the two groups with regards to Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO) fracture classification, time from injury to surgery, blood transfusion post surgery and hospital stay. The surgical duration for a short PFNA procedure was significantly less (58 minutes) when compared to that of a long PFNA (87 minutes). Similarly intra-operative blood loss was significantly higher in the long PFNA group as compared to the short PFNA. Conclusions: A relatively quicker surgical time of just under an hour , lesser blood loss and better learning curve with trainee surgeons make short PFNA a better implant choice in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5333699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53336992017-04-21 Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures Raval, P Ramasamy, A Raza, H Khan, K Awan, N Malays Orthop J Original Article Introduction: A comparative evaluation of the surgical treatment and outcome of patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated with short versus long proximal femoral nail antirotation. Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated between January 2011 and June 2012. In all 80 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 40 were treated with short PFNA and the remaining with long PFNA. Comparative analyses of demographic data, peri-operative outcome and complications were carried out. Results: There was no significant difference noted in the two groups with regards to Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO) fracture classification, time from injury to surgery, blood transfusion post surgery and hospital stay. The surgical duration for a short PFNA procedure was significantly less (58 minutes) when compared to that of a long PFNA (87 minutes). Similarly intra-operative blood loss was significantly higher in the long PFNA group as compared to the short PFNA. Conclusions: A relatively quicker surgical time of just under an hour , lesser blood loss and better learning curve with trainee surgeons make short PFNA a better implant choice in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5333699/ /pubmed/28435543 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1603.005 Text en © 2016 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA). All Rights Reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Raval, P
Ramasamy, A
Raza, H
Khan, K
Awan, N
Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures
title Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures
title_full Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures
title_fullStr Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures
title_short Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures
title_sort comparison of short vs long anti-rotation in treating trochanteric fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435543
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1603.005
work_keys_str_mv AT ravalp comparisonofshortvslongantirotationintreatingtrochantericfractures
AT ramasamya comparisonofshortvslongantirotationintreatingtrochantericfractures
AT razah comparisonofshortvslongantirotationintreatingtrochantericfractures
AT khank comparisonofshortvslongantirotationintreatingtrochantericfractures
AT awann comparisonofshortvslongantirotationintreatingtrochantericfractures