Cargando…
Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
We have empirically assessed the distribution of published effect sizes and estimated power by analyzing 26,841 statistical records from 3,801 cognitive neuroscience and psychology papers published recently. The reported median effect size was D = 0.93 (interquartile range: 0.64–1.46) for nominally...
Autores principales: | Szucs, Denes, Ioannidis, John P. A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28253258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction: Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
por: Szucs, Denes, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Published correlational effect sizes in social and developmental psychology
por: Weinerová, Josefína, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Power Contours: Optimising Sample Size and Precision in Experimental Psychology and Human Neuroscience
por: Baker, Daniel H., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?
por: Serghiou, Stylianos, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Disconnected psychology and neuroscience—implications for scientific progress, replicability and the role of publishing
por: Beste, Christian
Publicado: (2021)