Cargando…

Rules for resolving Mendelian inconsistencies in nuclear pedigrees typed for two-allele markers

Gene-mapping studies, regularly, rely on examination for Mendelian transmission of marker alleles in a pedigree as a way of screening for genotyping errors and mutations. For analysis of family data sets, it is, usually, necessary to resolve or remove the genotyping errors prior to consideration. At...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Sajjad Ahmad, Manzoor, Sadaf, Alamgir, Ali, Amjad, Khan, Dost Muhammad, Khalil, Umair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28253278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172807
Descripción
Sumario:Gene-mapping studies, regularly, rely on examination for Mendelian transmission of marker alleles in a pedigree as a way of screening for genotyping errors and mutations. For analysis of family data sets, it is, usually, necessary to resolve or remove the genotyping errors prior to consideration. At the Center of Inherited Disease Research (CIDR), to deal with their large-scale data flow, they formalized their data cleaning approach in a set of rules based on PedCheck output. We scrutinize via carefully designed simulations that how well CIDR’s data cleaning rules work in practice. We found that genotype errors in siblings are detected more often than in parents for less polymorphic SNPs and vice versa for more polymorphic SNPs. Through computer simulations, we conclude that some of the CIDR’s rules work poorly in some circumstances, and we suggest a set of modified data cleaning rules that may work better than CIDR’s rules.