Cargando…
The effect of paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents in a rabbit esophageal squamous carcinoma model
BACKGROUND: The use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMSs) is the current treatment of choice for malignant gastrointestinal obstructions. However, these stents can promote only drainage and have no antitumor effect. Some studies have reported that drug-eluting SEMSs may have tumor inhibition pot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28253360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173262 |
_version_ | 1782511793085612032 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yin Ma, Limei Huang, Jin Shuang, Jinquan Chen, Jianping Fan, Zhining |
author_facet | Zhang, Yin Ma, Limei Huang, Jin Shuang, Jinquan Chen, Jianping Fan, Zhining |
author_sort | Zhang, Yin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMSs) is the current treatment of choice for malignant gastrointestinal obstructions. However, these stents can promote only drainage and have no antitumor effect. Some studies have reported that drug-eluting SEMSs may have tumor inhibition potential. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and safety of paclitaxel-eluting SEMSs (PEMSs) in rabbit esophageal cancer models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PEMS was covered with a paclitaxel-incorporated membrane, in which the concentration of paclitaxel was 10% (wt/vol). The rabbit models were created endoscopically. Then, a PEMS or SEMS was endoscopically inserted into the rabbit esophagus. Two weeks after stent placement, the rabbits were sacrificed, and we evaluated the tumor volume, area of the wall defect, area of the tumor under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) before and after stent placement, status of the proximal esophageal obstruction, tumor metastasis food-intake and weight loss. RESULTS: A total of 26 rabbits received stent insertion and survived until sacrifice, and migration occurred in 4 cases, 3 in SEMS group and 1 in PEMS group. For the remaining 22 rabbits, at the sacrificed time, the average tumor volume was 7.00±4.30 cm(3) in the SEMS group and 0.94±1.51 cm(3) in the PEMS group (P<0.05). The area of the esophageal wall defect was 0.70±0.63 cm(2) in the SEMS group and 0.17±0.16 cm(2) in the PEMS group (P<0.05). The tumor area under EUS was 4.40±1.47 cm(2) in the SEMS group and 1.30±1.06 cm(2) in the PEMS group (P<0.05). At the time of stent placement, tumor area under EUS was comparable in the two groups. Other indices did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SEMS and PEMS are both safe and effective to relieve dysphagia in rabbit esophageal cancer models. A PEMS can serve as an alternative tool for advanced esophageal cancer that may inhibit tumor growth by serving as a drug sustained-release platform. Clinical trials of the stent are warranted in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5333899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53338992017-03-10 The effect of paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents in a rabbit esophageal squamous carcinoma model Zhang, Yin Ma, Limei Huang, Jin Shuang, Jinquan Chen, Jianping Fan, Zhining PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMSs) is the current treatment of choice for malignant gastrointestinal obstructions. However, these stents can promote only drainage and have no antitumor effect. Some studies have reported that drug-eluting SEMSs may have tumor inhibition potential. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and safety of paclitaxel-eluting SEMSs (PEMSs) in rabbit esophageal cancer models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PEMS was covered with a paclitaxel-incorporated membrane, in which the concentration of paclitaxel was 10% (wt/vol). The rabbit models were created endoscopically. Then, a PEMS or SEMS was endoscopically inserted into the rabbit esophagus. Two weeks after stent placement, the rabbits were sacrificed, and we evaluated the tumor volume, area of the wall defect, area of the tumor under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) before and after stent placement, status of the proximal esophageal obstruction, tumor metastasis food-intake and weight loss. RESULTS: A total of 26 rabbits received stent insertion and survived until sacrifice, and migration occurred in 4 cases, 3 in SEMS group and 1 in PEMS group. For the remaining 22 rabbits, at the sacrificed time, the average tumor volume was 7.00±4.30 cm(3) in the SEMS group and 0.94±1.51 cm(3) in the PEMS group (P<0.05). The area of the esophageal wall defect was 0.70±0.63 cm(2) in the SEMS group and 0.17±0.16 cm(2) in the PEMS group (P<0.05). The tumor area under EUS was 4.40±1.47 cm(2) in the SEMS group and 1.30±1.06 cm(2) in the PEMS group (P<0.05). At the time of stent placement, tumor area under EUS was comparable in the two groups. Other indices did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SEMS and PEMS are both safe and effective to relieve dysphagia in rabbit esophageal cancer models. A PEMS can serve as an alternative tool for advanced esophageal cancer that may inhibit tumor growth by serving as a drug sustained-release platform. Clinical trials of the stent are warranted in the future. Public Library of Science 2017-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5333899/ /pubmed/28253360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173262 Text en © 2017 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Yin Ma, Limei Huang, Jin Shuang, Jinquan Chen, Jianping Fan, Zhining The effect of paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents in a rabbit esophageal squamous carcinoma model |
title | The effect of paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents in a rabbit esophageal squamous carcinoma model |
title_full | The effect of paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents in a rabbit esophageal squamous carcinoma model |
title_fullStr | The effect of paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents in a rabbit esophageal squamous carcinoma model |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents in a rabbit esophageal squamous carcinoma model |
title_short | The effect of paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents in a rabbit esophageal squamous carcinoma model |
title_sort | effect of paclitaxel-eluting covered metal stents versus covered metal stents in a rabbit esophageal squamous carcinoma model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28253360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyin theeffectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT malimei theeffectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT huangjin theeffectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT shuangjinquan theeffectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT chenjianping theeffectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT fanzhining theeffectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT zhangyin effectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT malimei effectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT huangjin effectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT shuangjinquan effectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT chenjianping effectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel AT fanzhining effectofpaclitaxelelutingcoveredmetalstentsversuscoveredmetalstentsinarabbitesophagealsquamouscarcinomamodel |