Cargando…
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a soluble combination of insulin degludec (70%) and insulin aspart (30%). The present exploratory trial investigated the safety of switching unit‐to‐unit from twice‐daily basal or pre‐mix insulin to twice‐daily IDegAsp in Japanese patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5334300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27560769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12569 |
_version_ | 1782511825924915200 |
---|---|
author | Onishi, Yukiko Yamada, Kenichi Zacho, Jeppe Ekelund, Jan Iwamoto, Yasuhiko |
author_facet | Onishi, Yukiko Yamada, Kenichi Zacho, Jeppe Ekelund, Jan Iwamoto, Yasuhiko |
author_sort | Onishi, Yukiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a soluble combination of insulin degludec (70%) and insulin aspart (30%). The present exploratory trial investigated the safety of switching unit‐to‐unit from twice‐daily basal or pre‐mix insulin to twice‐daily IDegAsp in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 6‐week, open‐label, parallel‐group, controlled trial, 66 participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either IDegAsp or biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) twice daily at the same total daily dose as pre‐trial insulin. During the trial, insulin doses were adjusted according to a pre‐specified algorithm to achieve pre‐breakfast and pre‐dinner plasma glucose of 4.4–7.2 mmol/L. RESULTS: No severe hypoglycemic episodes occurred. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of confirmed hypoglycemia (rate ratio IDegAsp/BIAsp 30: 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.31–1.30) and confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia (rate ratio: 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.10–2.38) for IDegAsp vs BIAsp 30. The hypoglycemia rate for IDegAsp was constant over the 6 weeks of treatment. IDegAsp and BIAsp 30 were both safe and well tolerated. Reduction in fasting plasma glucose was statistically significantly greater for IDegAsp than for BIAsp 30 (estimated treatment difference, IDegAsp‐BIAsp 30: −1.6 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval: −2.4 to −0.8). The apparent decrease in mean postprandial plasma glucose increment (IDegAsp: 4.2–3.8 mmol/L; BIAsp 30: 4.5–2.8 mmol/L) was not statistically significantly different between treatments (estimated treatment difference: 1.0 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval: −0.1 to 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Switching unit‐to‐unit from basal or pre‐mix insulin to IDegAsp seems not to be associated with any concerns related to hypoglycemia or general safety in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5334300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53343002017-03-06 Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial Onishi, Yukiko Yamada, Kenichi Zacho, Jeppe Ekelund, Jan Iwamoto, Yasuhiko J Diabetes Investig Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a soluble combination of insulin degludec (70%) and insulin aspart (30%). The present exploratory trial investigated the safety of switching unit‐to‐unit from twice‐daily basal or pre‐mix insulin to twice‐daily IDegAsp in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 6‐week, open‐label, parallel‐group, controlled trial, 66 participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either IDegAsp or biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) twice daily at the same total daily dose as pre‐trial insulin. During the trial, insulin doses were adjusted according to a pre‐specified algorithm to achieve pre‐breakfast and pre‐dinner plasma glucose of 4.4–7.2 mmol/L. RESULTS: No severe hypoglycemic episodes occurred. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of confirmed hypoglycemia (rate ratio IDegAsp/BIAsp 30: 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.31–1.30) and confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia (rate ratio: 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.10–2.38) for IDegAsp vs BIAsp 30. The hypoglycemia rate for IDegAsp was constant over the 6 weeks of treatment. IDegAsp and BIAsp 30 were both safe and well tolerated. Reduction in fasting plasma glucose was statistically significantly greater for IDegAsp than for BIAsp 30 (estimated treatment difference, IDegAsp‐BIAsp 30: −1.6 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval: −2.4 to −0.8). The apparent decrease in mean postprandial plasma glucose increment (IDegAsp: 4.2–3.8 mmol/L; BIAsp 30: 4.5–2.8 mmol/L) was not statistically significantly different between treatments (estimated treatment difference: 1.0 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval: −0.1 to 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Switching unit‐to‐unit from basal or pre‐mix insulin to IDegAsp seems not to be associated with any concerns related to hypoglycemia or general safety in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-07 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5334300/ /pubmed/27560769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12569 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Onishi, Yukiko Yamada, Kenichi Zacho, Jeppe Ekelund, Jan Iwamoto, Yasuhiko Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5334300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27560769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12569 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onishiyukiko insulindegludecinsulinaspartvsbiphasicinsulinaspart30twicedailyinjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yamadakenichi insulindegludecinsulinaspartvsbiphasicinsulinaspart30twicedailyinjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zachojeppe insulindegludecinsulinaspartvsbiphasicinsulinaspart30twicedailyinjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ekelundjan insulindegludecinsulinaspartvsbiphasicinsulinaspart30twicedailyinjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT iwamotoyasuhiko insulindegludecinsulinaspartvsbiphasicinsulinaspart30twicedailyinjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial |