Cargando…

Comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network

BACKGROUND: With the advancement of high-throughput technologies and enrichment of popular public databases, more and more research focuses of bioinformatics research have been on computational integration of network and gene expression profiles for extracting context-dependent active subnetworks. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Hao, Lin, Dongdong, Zhang, Jigang, Wang, Yu-ping, Deng, Hong-wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5335754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28253853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1567-2
_version_ 1782512099734323200
author He, Hao
Lin, Dongdong
Zhang, Jigang
Wang, Yu-ping
Deng, Hong-wen
author_facet He, Hao
Lin, Dongdong
Zhang, Jigang
Wang, Yu-ping
Deng, Hong-wen
author_sort He, Hao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the advancement of high-throughput technologies and enrichment of popular public databases, more and more research focuses of bioinformatics research have been on computational integration of network and gene expression profiles for extracting context-dependent active subnetworks. Many methods for subnetwork searching have been developed. Scoring and searching algorithms present a range of computational considerations and implementations. The primary goal of present study is to comprehensively evaluate the performance of different subnetwork detection methods. Eleven popular methods were selected for comprehensive comparison. RESULTS: First, taking into account the dependence of genes given a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, we simulated microarray gene expression data under case and control conditions. Then each method was applied to the simulated data for subnetwork identification. Second, a large microarray data set of prostate cancer was used to assess the practical performance of each method. Using both simulation studies and a real data application, we evaluated the performance of different methods in terms of recall and precision. CONCLUSIONS: jActiveModules, PinnacleZ and WMAXC performed well in identifying subnetwork with relative high precision and recall. BioNet performed very well only in precision. As none of methods outperformed other methods overall, users should choose an appropriate method based on the purposes of their studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5335754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53357542017-03-07 Comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network He, Hao Lin, Dongdong Zhang, Jigang Wang, Yu-ping Deng, Hong-wen BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: With the advancement of high-throughput technologies and enrichment of popular public databases, more and more research focuses of bioinformatics research have been on computational integration of network and gene expression profiles for extracting context-dependent active subnetworks. Many methods for subnetwork searching have been developed. Scoring and searching algorithms present a range of computational considerations and implementations. The primary goal of present study is to comprehensively evaluate the performance of different subnetwork detection methods. Eleven popular methods were selected for comprehensive comparison. RESULTS: First, taking into account the dependence of genes given a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, we simulated microarray gene expression data under case and control conditions. Then each method was applied to the simulated data for subnetwork identification. Second, a large microarray data set of prostate cancer was used to assess the practical performance of each method. Using both simulation studies and a real data application, we evaluated the performance of different methods in terms of recall and precision. CONCLUSIONS: jActiveModules, PinnacleZ and WMAXC performed well in identifying subnetwork with relative high precision and recall. BioNet performed very well only in precision. As none of methods outperformed other methods overall, users should choose an appropriate method based on the purposes of their studies. BioMed Central 2017-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5335754/ /pubmed/28253853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1567-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Hao
Lin, Dongdong
Zhang, Jigang
Wang, Yu-ping
Deng, Hong-wen
Comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network
title Comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network
title_full Comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network
title_fullStr Comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network
title_short Comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network
title_sort comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5335754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28253853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1567-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hehao comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforsubnetworkdetectionintheintegrationofgeneexpressionandproteininteractionnetwork
AT lindongdong comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforsubnetworkdetectionintheintegrationofgeneexpressionandproteininteractionnetwork
AT zhangjigang comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforsubnetworkdetectionintheintegrationofgeneexpressionandproteininteractionnetwork
AT wangyuping comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforsubnetworkdetectionintheintegrationofgeneexpressionandproteininteractionnetwork
AT denghongwen comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforsubnetworkdetectionintheintegrationofgeneexpressionandproteininteractionnetwork