Cargando…

The interval approach: an adaptation of the liver-first approach to treat synchronous liver metastases from rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The waiting interval after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is an interesting therapeutic window to treat patients with synchronous liver metastases (SLM) from rectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 18 consecutive patients (M/F 10/8, age (range) 60 (51–75) years) from f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Hondt, Mathieu, Lucidi, Valerio, Vermeiren, Koen, Van Den Bossche, Bert, Donckier, Vincent, Sergeant, Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5335842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28253875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1123-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The waiting interval after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is an interesting therapeutic window to treat patients with synchronous liver metastases (SLM) from rectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 18 consecutive patients (M/F 10/8, age (range) 60 (51–75) years) from five institutions who underwent liver resection of SLM during the waiting interval after CRT for rectal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: All patients underwent interval liver surgery for a median (range) of 4 (2–14) liver metastases. Metastases involved a median (range) of 4 (1–7) liver segments. Median (range) time between end of CRT and liver surgery was 22 (6–45) days. Laparoscopic liver surgery was performed in 12 (67%) patients. No severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) occurred after liver surgery. Median (range) length of hospital stay after liver surgery was 5 (1–10) days. All patients subsequently underwent rectal resection at a median (range) of 10 (8–13) weeks after end of CRT. Median (IQR) time-to-progression after liver surgery was 4.2 (2.8–9.2) months. CONCLUSIONS: The waiting interval after neoadjuvant CRT is a valuable option to treat SLM from rectal cancer. More data are necessary to confirm its oncological efficacy.