Cargando…
A Methodology to Monitor Airborne PM(10) Dust Particles Using a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Throughout the process of coal extraction from surface mines, gases and particles are emitted in the form of fugitive emissions by activities such as hauling, blasting and transportation. As these emissions are diffuse in nature, estimations based upon emission factors and dispersion/advection equat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5335937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020343 |
_version_ | 1782512124721889280 |
---|---|
author | Alvarado, Miguel Gonzalez, Felipe Erskine, Peter Cliff, David Heuff, Darlene |
author_facet | Alvarado, Miguel Gonzalez, Felipe Erskine, Peter Cliff, David Heuff, Darlene |
author_sort | Alvarado, Miguel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Throughout the process of coal extraction from surface mines, gases and particles are emitted in the form of fugitive emissions by activities such as hauling, blasting and transportation. As these emissions are diffuse in nature, estimations based upon emission factors and dispersion/advection equations need to be measured directly from the atmosphere. This paper expands upon previous research undertaken to develop a relative methodology to monitor PM(10) dust particles produced by mining activities making use of small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). A module sensor using a laser particle counter (OPC-N2 from Alphasense, Great Notley, Essex, UK) was tested. An aerodynamic flow experiment was undertaken to determine the position and length of a sampling probe of the sensing module. Flight tests were conducted in order to demonstrate that the sensor provided data which could be used to calculate the emission rate of a source. Emission rates are a critical variable for further predictive dispersion estimates. First, data collected by the airborne module was verified using a 5.0 m tower in which a TSI DRX 8533 (reference dust monitoring device, TSI, Shoreview, MN, USA) and a duplicate of the module sensor were installed. Second, concentration values collected by the monitoring module attached to the UAV (airborne module) obtaining a percentage error of 1.1%. Finally, emission rates from the source were calculated, with airborne data, obtaining errors as low as 1.2%. These errors are low and indicate that the readings collected with the airborne module are comparable to the TSI DRX and could be used to obtain specific emission factors from fugitive emissions for industrial activities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5335937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53359372017-03-16 A Methodology to Monitor Airborne PM(10) Dust Particles Using a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Alvarado, Miguel Gonzalez, Felipe Erskine, Peter Cliff, David Heuff, Darlene Sensors (Basel) Article Throughout the process of coal extraction from surface mines, gases and particles are emitted in the form of fugitive emissions by activities such as hauling, blasting and transportation. As these emissions are diffuse in nature, estimations based upon emission factors and dispersion/advection equations need to be measured directly from the atmosphere. This paper expands upon previous research undertaken to develop a relative methodology to monitor PM(10) dust particles produced by mining activities making use of small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). A module sensor using a laser particle counter (OPC-N2 from Alphasense, Great Notley, Essex, UK) was tested. An aerodynamic flow experiment was undertaken to determine the position and length of a sampling probe of the sensing module. Flight tests were conducted in order to demonstrate that the sensor provided data which could be used to calculate the emission rate of a source. Emission rates are a critical variable for further predictive dispersion estimates. First, data collected by the airborne module was verified using a 5.0 m tower in which a TSI DRX 8533 (reference dust monitoring device, TSI, Shoreview, MN, USA) and a duplicate of the module sensor were installed. Second, concentration values collected by the monitoring module attached to the UAV (airborne module) obtaining a percentage error of 1.1%. Finally, emission rates from the source were calculated, with airborne data, obtaining errors as low as 1.2%. These errors are low and indicate that the readings collected with the airborne module are comparable to the TSI DRX and could be used to obtain specific emission factors from fugitive emissions for industrial activities. MDPI 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5335937/ /pubmed/28216557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020343 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Alvarado, Miguel Gonzalez, Felipe Erskine, Peter Cliff, David Heuff, Darlene A Methodology to Monitor Airborne PM(10) Dust Particles Using a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
title | A Methodology to Monitor Airborne PM(10) Dust Particles Using a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
title_full | A Methodology to Monitor Airborne PM(10) Dust Particles Using a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
title_fullStr | A Methodology to Monitor Airborne PM(10) Dust Particles Using a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
title_full_unstemmed | A Methodology to Monitor Airborne PM(10) Dust Particles Using a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
title_short | A Methodology to Monitor Airborne PM(10) Dust Particles Using a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
title_sort | methodology to monitor airborne pm(10) dust particles using a small unmanned aerial vehicle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5335937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvaradomiguel amethodologytomonitorairbornepm10dustparticlesusingasmallunmannedaerialvehicle AT gonzalezfelipe amethodologytomonitorairbornepm10dustparticlesusingasmallunmannedaerialvehicle AT erskinepeter amethodologytomonitorairbornepm10dustparticlesusingasmallunmannedaerialvehicle AT cliffdavid amethodologytomonitorairbornepm10dustparticlesusingasmallunmannedaerialvehicle AT heuffdarlene amethodologytomonitorairbornepm10dustparticlesusingasmallunmannedaerialvehicle AT alvaradomiguel methodologytomonitorairbornepm10dustparticlesusingasmallunmannedaerialvehicle AT gonzalezfelipe methodologytomonitorairbornepm10dustparticlesusingasmallunmannedaerialvehicle AT erskinepeter methodologytomonitorairbornepm10dustparticlesusingasmallunmannedaerialvehicle AT cliffdavid methodologytomonitorairbornepm10dustparticlesusingasmallunmannedaerialvehicle AT heuffdarlene methodologytomonitorairbornepm10dustparticlesusingasmallunmannedaerialvehicle |