Cargando…

A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies

RGB-D (Red Green Blue and Depth) sensors are devices that can provide color and depth information from a scene at the same time. Recently, they have been widely used in many solutions due to their commercial growth from the entertainment market to many diverse areas (e.g., robotics, CAD, etc.). In t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villena-Martínez, Víctor, Fuster-Guilló, Andrés, Azorín-López, Jorge, Saval-Calvo, Marcelo, Mora-Pascual, Jeronimo, Garcia-Rodriguez, Jose, Garcia-Garcia, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28134826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020243
_version_ 1782512145917804544
author Villena-Martínez, Víctor
Fuster-Guilló, Andrés
Azorín-López, Jorge
Saval-Calvo, Marcelo
Mora-Pascual, Jeronimo
Garcia-Rodriguez, Jose
Garcia-Garcia, Alberto
author_facet Villena-Martínez, Víctor
Fuster-Guilló, Andrés
Azorín-López, Jorge
Saval-Calvo, Marcelo
Mora-Pascual, Jeronimo
Garcia-Rodriguez, Jose
Garcia-Garcia, Alberto
author_sort Villena-Martínez, Víctor
collection PubMed
description RGB-D (Red Green Blue and Depth) sensors are devices that can provide color and depth information from a scene at the same time. Recently, they have been widely used in many solutions due to their commercial growth from the entertainment market to many diverse areas (e.g., robotics, CAD, etc.). In the research community, these devices have had good uptake due to their acceptable level of accuracy for many applications and their low cost, but in some cases, they work at the limit of their sensitivity, near to the minimum feature size that can be perceived. For this reason, calibration processes are critical in order to increase their accuracy and enable them to meet the requirements of such kinds of applications. To the best of our knowledge, there is not a comparative study of calibration algorithms evaluating its results in multiple RGB-D sensors. Specifically, in this paper, a comparison of the three most used calibration methods have been applied to three different RGB-D sensors based on structured light and time-of-flight. The comparison of methods has been carried out by a set of experiments to evaluate the accuracy of depth measurements. Additionally, an object reconstruction application has been used as example of an application for which the sensor works at the limit of its sensitivity. The obtained results of reconstruction have been evaluated through visual inspection and quantitative measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5336030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53360302017-03-16 A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies Villena-Martínez, Víctor Fuster-Guilló, Andrés Azorín-López, Jorge Saval-Calvo, Marcelo Mora-Pascual, Jeronimo Garcia-Rodriguez, Jose Garcia-Garcia, Alberto Sensors (Basel) Article RGB-D (Red Green Blue and Depth) sensors are devices that can provide color and depth information from a scene at the same time. Recently, they have been widely used in many solutions due to their commercial growth from the entertainment market to many diverse areas (e.g., robotics, CAD, etc.). In the research community, these devices have had good uptake due to their acceptable level of accuracy for many applications and their low cost, but in some cases, they work at the limit of their sensitivity, near to the minimum feature size that can be perceived. For this reason, calibration processes are critical in order to increase their accuracy and enable them to meet the requirements of such kinds of applications. To the best of our knowledge, there is not a comparative study of calibration algorithms evaluating its results in multiple RGB-D sensors. Specifically, in this paper, a comparison of the three most used calibration methods have been applied to three different RGB-D sensors based on structured light and time-of-flight. The comparison of methods has been carried out by a set of experiments to evaluate the accuracy of depth measurements. Additionally, an object reconstruction application has been used as example of an application for which the sensor works at the limit of its sensitivity. The obtained results of reconstruction have been evaluated through visual inspection and quantitative measurements. MDPI 2017-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5336030/ /pubmed/28134826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020243 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Villena-Martínez, Víctor
Fuster-Guilló, Andrés
Azorín-López, Jorge
Saval-Calvo, Marcelo
Mora-Pascual, Jeronimo
Garcia-Rodriguez, Jose
Garcia-Garcia, Alberto
A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies
title A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies
title_full A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies
title_fullStr A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies
title_full_unstemmed A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies
title_short A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies
title_sort quantitative comparison of calibration methods for rgb-d sensors using different technologies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28134826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020243
work_keys_str_mv AT villenamartinezvictor aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT fusterguilloandres aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT azorinlopezjorge aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT savalcalvomarcelo aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT morapascualjeronimo aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT garciarodriguezjose aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT garciagarciaalberto aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT villenamartinezvictor quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT fusterguilloandres quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT azorinlopezjorge quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT savalcalvomarcelo quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT morapascualjeronimo quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT garciarodriguezjose quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies
AT garciagarciaalberto quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies