Cargando…
A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies
RGB-D (Red Green Blue and Depth) sensors are devices that can provide color and depth information from a scene at the same time. Recently, they have been widely used in many solutions due to their commercial growth from the entertainment market to many diverse areas (e.g., robotics, CAD, etc.). In t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28134826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020243 |
_version_ | 1782512145917804544 |
---|---|
author | Villena-Martínez, Víctor Fuster-Guilló, Andrés Azorín-López, Jorge Saval-Calvo, Marcelo Mora-Pascual, Jeronimo Garcia-Rodriguez, Jose Garcia-Garcia, Alberto |
author_facet | Villena-Martínez, Víctor Fuster-Guilló, Andrés Azorín-López, Jorge Saval-Calvo, Marcelo Mora-Pascual, Jeronimo Garcia-Rodriguez, Jose Garcia-Garcia, Alberto |
author_sort | Villena-Martínez, Víctor |
collection | PubMed |
description | RGB-D (Red Green Blue and Depth) sensors are devices that can provide color and depth information from a scene at the same time. Recently, they have been widely used in many solutions due to their commercial growth from the entertainment market to many diverse areas (e.g., robotics, CAD, etc.). In the research community, these devices have had good uptake due to their acceptable level of accuracy for many applications and their low cost, but in some cases, they work at the limit of their sensitivity, near to the minimum feature size that can be perceived. For this reason, calibration processes are critical in order to increase their accuracy and enable them to meet the requirements of such kinds of applications. To the best of our knowledge, there is not a comparative study of calibration algorithms evaluating its results in multiple RGB-D sensors. Specifically, in this paper, a comparison of the three most used calibration methods have been applied to three different RGB-D sensors based on structured light and time-of-flight. The comparison of methods has been carried out by a set of experiments to evaluate the accuracy of depth measurements. Additionally, an object reconstruction application has been used as example of an application for which the sensor works at the limit of its sensitivity. The obtained results of reconstruction have been evaluated through visual inspection and quantitative measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5336030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53360302017-03-16 A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies Villena-Martínez, Víctor Fuster-Guilló, Andrés Azorín-López, Jorge Saval-Calvo, Marcelo Mora-Pascual, Jeronimo Garcia-Rodriguez, Jose Garcia-Garcia, Alberto Sensors (Basel) Article RGB-D (Red Green Blue and Depth) sensors are devices that can provide color and depth information from a scene at the same time. Recently, they have been widely used in many solutions due to their commercial growth from the entertainment market to many diverse areas (e.g., robotics, CAD, etc.). In the research community, these devices have had good uptake due to their acceptable level of accuracy for many applications and their low cost, but in some cases, they work at the limit of their sensitivity, near to the minimum feature size that can be perceived. For this reason, calibration processes are critical in order to increase their accuracy and enable them to meet the requirements of such kinds of applications. To the best of our knowledge, there is not a comparative study of calibration algorithms evaluating its results in multiple RGB-D sensors. Specifically, in this paper, a comparison of the three most used calibration methods have been applied to three different RGB-D sensors based on structured light and time-of-flight. The comparison of methods has been carried out by a set of experiments to evaluate the accuracy of depth measurements. Additionally, an object reconstruction application has been used as example of an application for which the sensor works at the limit of its sensitivity. The obtained results of reconstruction have been evaluated through visual inspection and quantitative measurements. MDPI 2017-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5336030/ /pubmed/28134826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020243 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Villena-Martínez, Víctor Fuster-Guilló, Andrés Azorín-López, Jorge Saval-Calvo, Marcelo Mora-Pascual, Jeronimo Garcia-Rodriguez, Jose Garcia-Garcia, Alberto A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies |
title | A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies |
title_full | A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies |
title_fullStr | A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies |
title_short | A Quantitative Comparison of Calibration Methods for RGB-D Sensors Using Different Technologies |
title_sort | quantitative comparison of calibration methods for rgb-d sensors using different technologies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28134826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villenamartinezvictor aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT fusterguilloandres aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT azorinlopezjorge aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT savalcalvomarcelo aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT morapascualjeronimo aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT garciarodriguezjose aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT garciagarciaalberto aquantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT villenamartinezvictor quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT fusterguilloandres quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT azorinlopezjorge quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT savalcalvomarcelo quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT morapascualjeronimo quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT garciarodriguezjose quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies AT garciagarciaalberto quantitativecomparisonofcalibrationmethodsforrgbdsensorsusingdifferenttechnologies |