Cargando…

Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts

Due to increasingly tighter emission limits for diesel and gasoline engines, especially concerning particulate matter emissions, particulate filters are becoming indispensable devices for exhaust gas after treatment. Thereby, for an efficient engine and filter control strategy and a cost-efficient f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feulner, Markus, Hagen, Gunter, Hottner, Kathrin, Redel, Sabrina, Müller, Andreas, Moos, Ralf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28218700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020400
_version_ 1782512161943191552
author Feulner, Markus
Hagen, Gunter
Hottner, Kathrin
Redel, Sabrina
Müller, Andreas
Moos, Ralf
author_facet Feulner, Markus
Hagen, Gunter
Hottner, Kathrin
Redel, Sabrina
Müller, Andreas
Moos, Ralf
author_sort Feulner, Markus
collection PubMed
description Due to increasingly tighter emission limits for diesel and gasoline engines, especially concerning particulate matter emissions, particulate filters are becoming indispensable devices for exhaust gas after treatment. Thereby, for an efficient engine and filter control strategy and a cost-efficient filter design, reliable technologies to determine the soot load of the filters and to measure particulate matter concentrations in the exhaust gas during vehicle operation are highly needed. In this study, different approaches for soot sensing are compared. Measurements were conducted on a dynamometer diesel engine test bench with a diesel particulate filter (DPF). The DPF was monitored by a relatively new microwave-based approach. Simultaneously, a resistive type soot sensor and a Pegasor soot sensing device as a reference system measured the soot concentration exhaust upstream of the DPF. By changing engine parameters, different engine out soot emission rates were set. It was found that the microwave-based signal may not only indicate directly the filter loading, but by a time derivative, the engine out soot emission rate can be deduced. Furthermore, by integrating the measured particulate mass in the exhaust, the soot load of the filter can be determined. In summary, all systems coincide well within certain boundaries and the filter itself can act as a soot sensor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5336101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53361012017-03-16 Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts Feulner, Markus Hagen, Gunter Hottner, Kathrin Redel, Sabrina Müller, Andreas Moos, Ralf Sensors (Basel) Article Due to increasingly tighter emission limits for diesel and gasoline engines, especially concerning particulate matter emissions, particulate filters are becoming indispensable devices for exhaust gas after treatment. Thereby, for an efficient engine and filter control strategy and a cost-efficient filter design, reliable technologies to determine the soot load of the filters and to measure particulate matter concentrations in the exhaust gas during vehicle operation are highly needed. In this study, different approaches for soot sensing are compared. Measurements were conducted on a dynamometer diesel engine test bench with a diesel particulate filter (DPF). The DPF was monitored by a relatively new microwave-based approach. Simultaneously, a resistive type soot sensor and a Pegasor soot sensing device as a reference system measured the soot concentration exhaust upstream of the DPF. By changing engine parameters, different engine out soot emission rates were set. It was found that the microwave-based signal may not only indicate directly the filter loading, but by a time derivative, the engine out soot emission rate can be deduced. Furthermore, by integrating the measured particulate mass in the exhaust, the soot load of the filter can be determined. In summary, all systems coincide well within certain boundaries and the filter itself can act as a soot sensor. MDPI 2017-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5336101/ /pubmed/28218700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020400 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Feulner, Markus
Hagen, Gunter
Hottner, Kathrin
Redel, Sabrina
Müller, Andreas
Moos, Ralf
Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts
title Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts
title_full Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts
title_short Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts
title_sort comparative study of different methods for soot sensing and filter monitoring in diesel exhausts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28218700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17020400
work_keys_str_mv AT feulnermarkus comparativestudyofdifferentmethodsforsootsensingandfiltermonitoringindieselexhausts
AT hagengunter comparativestudyofdifferentmethodsforsootsensingandfiltermonitoringindieselexhausts
AT hottnerkathrin comparativestudyofdifferentmethodsforsootsensingandfiltermonitoringindieselexhausts
AT redelsabrina comparativestudyofdifferentmethodsforsootsensingandfiltermonitoringindieselexhausts
AT mullerandreas comparativestudyofdifferentmethodsforsootsensingandfiltermonitoringindieselexhausts
AT moosralf comparativestudyofdifferentmethodsforsootsensingandfiltermonitoringindieselexhausts