Cargando…

Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation

BACKGROUND: Lesion stiffness measured by shear wave elastography has shown to effectively separate benign from malignant breast masses. The aim of this study was to evaluate different aspects of Comb-push Ultrasound Shear Elastography (CUSE) performance in differentiating breast masses. METHODS: Wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayat, Mahdi, Denis, Max, Gregory, Adriana, Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad, Kumar, Viksit, Meixner, Duane, Fazzio, Robert T., Fatemi, Mostafa, Alizad, Azra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28257467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172801
_version_ 1782512175122743296
author Bayat, Mahdi
Denis, Max
Gregory, Adriana
Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad
Kumar, Viksit
Meixner, Duane
Fazzio, Robert T.
Fatemi, Mostafa
Alizad, Azra
author_facet Bayat, Mahdi
Denis, Max
Gregory, Adriana
Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad
Kumar, Viksit
Meixner, Duane
Fazzio, Robert T.
Fatemi, Mostafa
Alizad, Azra
author_sort Bayat, Mahdi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lesion stiffness measured by shear wave elastography has shown to effectively separate benign from malignant breast masses. The aim of this study was to evaluate different aspects of Comb-push Ultrasound Shear Elastography (CUSE) performance in differentiating breast masses. METHODS: With written signed informed consent, this HIPAA- compliant, IRB approved prospective study included patients from April 2014 through August 2016 with breast masses identified on conventional imaging. Data from 223 patients (19–85 years, mean 59.93±14.96 years) with 227 suspicious breast masses identifiable by ultrasound (mean size 1.83±2.45cm) were analyzed. CUSE was performed on all patients. Three regions of interest (ROI), 3 mm in diameter each, were selected inside the lesion on the B-mode ultrasound which also appeared in the corresponding shear wave map. Lesion elasticity values were measured in terms of the Young’s modulus. In correlation to pathology results, statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Pathology revealed 108 lesions as malignant and 115 lesions as benign. Additionally, 4 lesions (BI-RADS 2 and 3) were considered benign and were not biopsied. Average lesion stiffness measured by CUSE resulted in 84.26% sensitivity (91 of 108), 89.92% specificity (107 of 119), 85.6% positive predictive value, 89% negative predictive value and 0.91 area under the curve (P<0.0001). Stiffness maps showed spatial continuity such that maximum and average elasticity did not have significantly different results (P > 0.21). CONCLUSION: CUSE was able to distinguish between benign and malignant breast masses with high sensitivity and specificity. Continuity of stiffness maps allowed for choosing multiple quantification ROIs which covered large areas of lesions and resulted in similar diagnostic performance based on average and maximum elasticity. The overall results of this study, highlights the clinical value of CUSE in differentiation of breast masses based on their stiffness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5336209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53362092017-03-10 Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation Bayat, Mahdi Denis, Max Gregory, Adriana Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad Kumar, Viksit Meixner, Duane Fazzio, Robert T. Fatemi, Mostafa Alizad, Azra PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Lesion stiffness measured by shear wave elastography has shown to effectively separate benign from malignant breast masses. The aim of this study was to evaluate different aspects of Comb-push Ultrasound Shear Elastography (CUSE) performance in differentiating breast masses. METHODS: With written signed informed consent, this HIPAA- compliant, IRB approved prospective study included patients from April 2014 through August 2016 with breast masses identified on conventional imaging. Data from 223 patients (19–85 years, mean 59.93±14.96 years) with 227 suspicious breast masses identifiable by ultrasound (mean size 1.83±2.45cm) were analyzed. CUSE was performed on all patients. Three regions of interest (ROI), 3 mm in diameter each, were selected inside the lesion on the B-mode ultrasound which also appeared in the corresponding shear wave map. Lesion elasticity values were measured in terms of the Young’s modulus. In correlation to pathology results, statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Pathology revealed 108 lesions as malignant and 115 lesions as benign. Additionally, 4 lesions (BI-RADS 2 and 3) were considered benign and were not biopsied. Average lesion stiffness measured by CUSE resulted in 84.26% sensitivity (91 of 108), 89.92% specificity (107 of 119), 85.6% positive predictive value, 89% negative predictive value and 0.91 area under the curve (P<0.0001). Stiffness maps showed spatial continuity such that maximum and average elasticity did not have significantly different results (P > 0.21). CONCLUSION: CUSE was able to distinguish between benign and malignant breast masses with high sensitivity and specificity. Continuity of stiffness maps allowed for choosing multiple quantification ROIs which covered large areas of lesions and resulted in similar diagnostic performance based on average and maximum elasticity. The overall results of this study, highlights the clinical value of CUSE in differentiation of breast masses based on their stiffness. Public Library of Science 2017-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5336209/ /pubmed/28257467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172801 Text en © 2017 Bayat et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bayat, Mahdi
Denis, Max
Gregory, Adriana
Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad
Kumar, Viksit
Meixner, Duane
Fazzio, Robert T.
Fatemi, Mostafa
Alizad, Azra
Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation
title Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation
title_full Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation
title_fullStr Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation
title_short Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation
title_sort diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28257467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172801
work_keys_str_mv AT bayatmahdi diagnosticfeaturesofquantitativecombpushshearelastographyforbreastlesiondifferentiation
AT denismax diagnosticfeaturesofquantitativecombpushshearelastographyforbreastlesiondifferentiation
AT gregoryadriana diagnosticfeaturesofquantitativecombpushshearelastographyforbreastlesiondifferentiation
AT mehrmohammadimohammad diagnosticfeaturesofquantitativecombpushshearelastographyforbreastlesiondifferentiation
AT kumarviksit diagnosticfeaturesofquantitativecombpushshearelastographyforbreastlesiondifferentiation
AT meixnerduane diagnosticfeaturesofquantitativecombpushshearelastographyforbreastlesiondifferentiation
AT fazziorobertt diagnosticfeaturesofquantitativecombpushshearelastographyforbreastlesiondifferentiation
AT fatemimostafa diagnosticfeaturesofquantitativecombpushshearelastographyforbreastlesiondifferentiation
AT alizadazra diagnosticfeaturesofquantitativecombpushshearelastographyforbreastlesiondifferentiation