Cargando…

Social dominance explains within-ejaculate variation in sperm design in a passerine bird

BACKGROUND: Comparative studies suggest that sperm competition exerts stabilizing selection towards an optimal sperm design – e.g., the relative size and covariation of different sperm sections or a quantitative measure of sperm shape - that maximizes male fertility, which results in reduced levels...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rojas Mora, Alfonso, Meniri, Magali, Ciprietti, Sabrina, Helfenstein, Fabrice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28259157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0914-2
_version_ 1782512231829733376
author Rojas Mora, Alfonso
Meniri, Magali
Ciprietti, Sabrina
Helfenstein, Fabrice
author_facet Rojas Mora, Alfonso
Meniri, Magali
Ciprietti, Sabrina
Helfenstein, Fabrice
author_sort Rojas Mora, Alfonso
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comparative studies suggest that sperm competition exerts stabilizing selection towards an optimal sperm design – e.g., the relative size and covariation of different sperm sections or a quantitative measure of sperm shape - that maximizes male fertility, which results in reduced levels of within-male variation in sperm morphology. Yet, these studies also reveal substantial amounts of unexplained within-ejaculate variance, and the factors presiding to the maintenance of such within-male variation in sperm design at the population level still remain to be identified. Sperm competition models predict that males should progressively invest more resources in their germline as their mating costs increase, i.e., the soma/germline allocation trade-off hypothesis. When access to fertile females is determined by social dominance, the soma/germline allocation trade-off hypothesis predicts that dominant males should invest less in the control of spermatogenesis. Hence, dominance should positively correlate with within-male variance in sperm design. RESULTS: In support of this hypothesis, we found that dominant house sparrow males produce ejaculates with higher levels of within-ejaculate variation in sperm design compared to subordinate males. However, after experimentally manipulating male social status, this pattern was not maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that males might control variation in sperm design according to their social status to some extent. Yet, it seems that such within-ejaculate variation in sperm design cannot be rapidly adjusted to a new status. While variation in sperm design could result from various non-exclusive sources, we discuss how strategic allocation of resources to the somatic vs. the germline functions could be an important process shaping the relationship between within-male variation in sperm design and social status. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-017-0914-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5336654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53366542017-03-07 Social dominance explains within-ejaculate variation in sperm design in a passerine bird Rojas Mora, Alfonso Meniri, Magali Ciprietti, Sabrina Helfenstein, Fabrice BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Comparative studies suggest that sperm competition exerts stabilizing selection towards an optimal sperm design – e.g., the relative size and covariation of different sperm sections or a quantitative measure of sperm shape - that maximizes male fertility, which results in reduced levels of within-male variation in sperm morphology. Yet, these studies also reveal substantial amounts of unexplained within-ejaculate variance, and the factors presiding to the maintenance of such within-male variation in sperm design at the population level still remain to be identified. Sperm competition models predict that males should progressively invest more resources in their germline as their mating costs increase, i.e., the soma/germline allocation trade-off hypothesis. When access to fertile females is determined by social dominance, the soma/germline allocation trade-off hypothesis predicts that dominant males should invest less in the control of spermatogenesis. Hence, dominance should positively correlate with within-male variance in sperm design. RESULTS: In support of this hypothesis, we found that dominant house sparrow males produce ejaculates with higher levels of within-ejaculate variation in sperm design compared to subordinate males. However, after experimentally manipulating male social status, this pattern was not maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that males might control variation in sperm design according to their social status to some extent. Yet, it seems that such within-ejaculate variation in sperm design cannot be rapidly adjusted to a new status. While variation in sperm design could result from various non-exclusive sources, we discuss how strategic allocation of resources to the somatic vs. the germline functions could be an important process shaping the relationship between within-male variation in sperm design and social status. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-017-0914-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5336654/ /pubmed/28259157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0914-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rojas Mora, Alfonso
Meniri, Magali
Ciprietti, Sabrina
Helfenstein, Fabrice
Social dominance explains within-ejaculate variation in sperm design in a passerine bird
title Social dominance explains within-ejaculate variation in sperm design in a passerine bird
title_full Social dominance explains within-ejaculate variation in sperm design in a passerine bird
title_fullStr Social dominance explains within-ejaculate variation in sperm design in a passerine bird
title_full_unstemmed Social dominance explains within-ejaculate variation in sperm design in a passerine bird
title_short Social dominance explains within-ejaculate variation in sperm design in a passerine bird
title_sort social dominance explains within-ejaculate variation in sperm design in a passerine bird
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28259157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0914-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rojasmoraalfonso socialdominanceexplainswithinejaculatevariationinspermdesigninapasserinebird
AT menirimagali socialdominanceexplainswithinejaculatevariationinspermdesigninapasserinebird
AT cipriettisabrina socialdominanceexplainswithinejaculatevariationinspermdesigninapasserinebird
AT helfensteinfabrice socialdominanceexplainswithinejaculatevariationinspermdesigninapasserinebird