Cargando…
Structural basis for potency differences between GDF8 and GDF11
BACKGROUND: Growth/differentiation factor 8 (GDF8) and GDF11 are two highly similar members of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) family. While GDF8 has been recognized as a negative regulator of muscle growth and differentiation, there are conflicting studies on the function of GDF11 and wheth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28257634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0350-1 |
_version_ | 1782512241046716416 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Ryan G. Czepnik, Magdalena Goebel, Erich J. McCoy, Jason C. Vujic, Ana Cho, Miook Oh, Juhyun Aykul, Senem Walton, Kelly L. Schang, Gauthier Bernard, Daniel J. Hinck, Andrew P. Harrison, Craig A. Martinez-Hackert, Erik Wagers, Amy J. Lee, Richard T. Thompson, Thomas B. |
author_facet | Walker, Ryan G. Czepnik, Magdalena Goebel, Erich J. McCoy, Jason C. Vujic, Ana Cho, Miook Oh, Juhyun Aykul, Senem Walton, Kelly L. Schang, Gauthier Bernard, Daniel J. Hinck, Andrew P. Harrison, Craig A. Martinez-Hackert, Erik Wagers, Amy J. Lee, Richard T. Thompson, Thomas B. |
author_sort | Walker, Ryan G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Growth/differentiation factor 8 (GDF8) and GDF11 are two highly similar members of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) family. While GDF8 has been recognized as a negative regulator of muscle growth and differentiation, there are conflicting studies on the function of GDF11 and whether GDF11 has beneficial effects on age-related dysfunction. To address whether GDF8 and GDF11 are functionally identical, we compared their signaling and structural properties. RESULTS: Here we show that, despite their high similarity, GDF11 is a more potent activator of SMAD2/3 and signals more effectively through the type I activin-like receptor kinase receptors ALK4/5/7 than GDF8. Resolution of the GDF11:FS288 complex, apo-GDF8, and apo-GDF11 crystal structures reveals unique properties of both ligands, specifically in the type I receptor binding site. Lastly, substitution of GDF11 residues into GDF8 confers enhanced activity to GDF8. CONCLUSIONS: These studies identify distinctive structural features of GDF11 that enhance its potency, relative to GDF8; however, the biological consequences of these differences remain to be determined. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0350-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5336696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53366962017-03-07 Structural basis for potency differences between GDF8 and GDF11 Walker, Ryan G. Czepnik, Magdalena Goebel, Erich J. McCoy, Jason C. Vujic, Ana Cho, Miook Oh, Juhyun Aykul, Senem Walton, Kelly L. Schang, Gauthier Bernard, Daniel J. Hinck, Andrew P. Harrison, Craig A. Martinez-Hackert, Erik Wagers, Amy J. Lee, Richard T. Thompson, Thomas B. BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Growth/differentiation factor 8 (GDF8) and GDF11 are two highly similar members of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) family. While GDF8 has been recognized as a negative regulator of muscle growth and differentiation, there are conflicting studies on the function of GDF11 and whether GDF11 has beneficial effects on age-related dysfunction. To address whether GDF8 and GDF11 are functionally identical, we compared their signaling and structural properties. RESULTS: Here we show that, despite their high similarity, GDF11 is a more potent activator of SMAD2/3 and signals more effectively through the type I activin-like receptor kinase receptors ALK4/5/7 than GDF8. Resolution of the GDF11:FS288 complex, apo-GDF8, and apo-GDF11 crystal structures reveals unique properties of both ligands, specifically in the type I receptor binding site. Lastly, substitution of GDF11 residues into GDF8 confers enhanced activity to GDF8. CONCLUSIONS: These studies identify distinctive structural features of GDF11 that enhance its potency, relative to GDF8; however, the biological consequences of these differences remain to be determined. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0350-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5336696/ /pubmed/28257634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0350-1 Text en © Thompson et al. 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Walker, Ryan G. Czepnik, Magdalena Goebel, Erich J. McCoy, Jason C. Vujic, Ana Cho, Miook Oh, Juhyun Aykul, Senem Walton, Kelly L. Schang, Gauthier Bernard, Daniel J. Hinck, Andrew P. Harrison, Craig A. Martinez-Hackert, Erik Wagers, Amy J. Lee, Richard T. Thompson, Thomas B. Structural basis for potency differences between GDF8 and GDF11 |
title | Structural basis for potency differences between GDF8 and GDF11 |
title_full | Structural basis for potency differences between GDF8 and GDF11 |
title_fullStr | Structural basis for potency differences between GDF8 and GDF11 |
title_full_unstemmed | Structural basis for potency differences between GDF8 and GDF11 |
title_short | Structural basis for potency differences between GDF8 and GDF11 |
title_sort | structural basis for potency differences between gdf8 and gdf11 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28257634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0350-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkerryang structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT czepnikmagdalena structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT goebelerichj structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT mccoyjasonc structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT vujicana structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT chomiook structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT ohjuhyun structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT aykulsenem structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT waltonkellyl structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT schanggauthier structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT bernarddanielj structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT hinckandrewp structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT harrisoncraiga structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT martinezhackerterik structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT wagersamyj structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT leerichardt structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 AT thompsonthomasb structuralbasisforpotencydifferencesbetweengdf8andgdf11 |