Cargando…

GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers

OBJECTIVE: GuideLiner catheter provides adequate back-up support and a coaxial guide engagement for stent delivery in complex coronary anatomies. In this study, we aimed to present one of the largest series of experience with GuideLiner catheter utilized for challenging percutaneous coronary interve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dursun, Hüseyin, Taştan, Ahmet, Tanrıverdi, Zülkif, Özel, Erdem, Kaya, Dayimi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26168458
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6214
_version_ 1782512260284940288
author Dursun, Hüseyin
Taştan, Ahmet
Tanrıverdi, Zülkif
Özel, Erdem
Kaya, Dayimi
author_facet Dursun, Hüseyin
Taştan, Ahmet
Tanrıverdi, Zülkif
Özel, Erdem
Kaya, Dayimi
author_sort Dursun, Hüseyin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: GuideLiner catheter provides adequate back-up support and a coaxial guide engagement for stent delivery in complex coronary anatomies. In this study, we aimed to present one of the largest series of experience with GuideLiner catheter utilized for challenging percutaneous coronary interventions in two centers. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the coronary angiography records of 64 patients between January 1, 2012 and August 1, 2014 in whom conventional techniques failed for stent delivery and 5-in-6 Fr GuideLiner catheter was used for this purpose. The data were assessed in terms of the lesion characteristics, procedural success, and complications. Descriptive statistics and frequencies were used in statistical analyses. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 69.8±10.0 years. Femoral approach was employed in all cases. Lesions were mostly (90.6%) class B2 or C according to the AHA/ACC lesion classification. The GuideLiner catheter was mainly used to increase back-up of the guide catheter (85.9%), and in 95.3% of all cases, the procedure was successful. The mean depth of the GuideLiner catheter intubation was 30.3±21.6 mm. None of the patients had coronary dissection or major complications. CONCLUSION: In this study, we presented a large registry of two centers used the GuideLiner catheter. The device effectively allowed stent delivery in challenging lesions, where conventional techniques have failed, without major complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5336781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53367812017-06-28 GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers Dursun, Hüseyin Taştan, Ahmet Tanrıverdi, Zülkif Özel, Erdem Kaya, Dayimi Anatol J Cardiol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: GuideLiner catheter provides adequate back-up support and a coaxial guide engagement for stent delivery in complex coronary anatomies. In this study, we aimed to present one of the largest series of experience with GuideLiner catheter utilized for challenging percutaneous coronary interventions in two centers. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the coronary angiography records of 64 patients between January 1, 2012 and August 1, 2014 in whom conventional techniques failed for stent delivery and 5-in-6 Fr GuideLiner catheter was used for this purpose. The data were assessed in terms of the lesion characteristics, procedural success, and complications. Descriptive statistics and frequencies were used in statistical analyses. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 69.8±10.0 years. Femoral approach was employed in all cases. Lesions were mostly (90.6%) class B2 or C according to the AHA/ACC lesion classification. The GuideLiner catheter was mainly used to increase back-up of the guide catheter (85.9%), and in 95.3% of all cases, the procedure was successful. The mean depth of the GuideLiner catheter intubation was 30.3±21.6 mm. None of the patients had coronary dissection or major complications. CONCLUSION: In this study, we presented a large registry of two centers used the GuideLiner catheter. The device effectively allowed stent delivery in challenging lesions, where conventional techniques have failed, without major complications. Kare Publishing 2016-05 2015-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5336781/ /pubmed/26168458 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6214 Text en Copyright © 2016 Turkish Society of Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Dursun, Hüseyin
Taştan, Ahmet
Tanrıverdi, Zülkif
Özel, Erdem
Kaya, Dayimi
GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers
title GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers
title_full GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers
title_fullStr GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers
title_full_unstemmed GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers
title_short GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers
title_sort guideliner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5336781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26168458
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6214
work_keys_str_mv AT dursunhuseyin guidelinercatheterapplicationincomplexcoronarylesionsexperienceoftwocenters
AT tastanahmet guidelinercatheterapplicationincomplexcoronarylesionsexperienceoftwocenters
AT tanrıverdizulkif guidelinercatheterapplicationincomplexcoronarylesionsexperienceoftwocenters
AT ozelerdem guidelinercatheterapplicationincomplexcoronarylesionsexperienceoftwocenters
AT kayadayimi guidelinercatheterapplicationincomplexcoronarylesionsexperienceoftwocenters