Cargando…
A clinical study about contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers
OBJECTIVE: There is still a group of patient that have unpredictable risk for the development of contrast nephropathy (CN). There is also an effort to find more effficient strategies to prevent CN. Carvedilol, metoprolol and nebivolol seem to have theoretical potentials for the prevention of CN. In...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kare Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25333980 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/akd.2014.5304 |
_version_ | 1782512324782850048 |
---|---|
author | Akgüllü, Çağdaş Eryılmaz, Ufuk Güngör, Hasan Huyut, Ahmet Zencir, Cemil Hekim, Tolga |
author_facet | Akgüllü, Çağdaş Eryılmaz, Ufuk Güngör, Hasan Huyut, Ahmet Zencir, Cemil Hekim, Tolga |
author_sort | Akgüllü, Çağdaş |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: There is still a group of patient that have unpredictable risk for the development of contrast nephropathy (CN). There is also an effort to find more effficient strategies to prevent CN. Carvedilol, metoprolol and nebivolol seem to have theoretical potentials for the prevention of CN. In this study, we aimed to investigate their effects on the prevention of CN. We also aimed to define the risk factors associated with the development of CN in our study group. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, the patients were divided into four groups according to whether they were taking 25 mg/day carvedilol (n:56), 5 mg/day nebivolol (n:60), 50 mg/day metoprolol (n:68) or none (n:63). We made analysis to determine the agents’ efficiency on the prevention of CN. We also performed multiple logistic regression analysis including all groups to define the risk factors associated with CN. RESULTS: The incidents of CN were the lowest in the carvedilol group (4%) while the worst performance occurred in those taking metoprolol (10%). The difference between the groups in terms of the development of CN did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed age (p=0.003), higher triglyceride levels (p=0.011) and family history of coronary artery disease (p=0.038) to be the predictors of CN. CONCLUSION: In this study, we didn’t find any relation between the development of CN and carvedilol, metoprolol or nebivolol usage. We found age, higher levels of triglyceride and family history of coronary artery disease to be risk factors for predicting CN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5337060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Kare Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53370602017-06-28 A clinical study about contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers Akgüllü, Çağdaş Eryılmaz, Ufuk Güngör, Hasan Huyut, Ahmet Zencir, Cemil Hekim, Tolga Anatol J Cardiol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: There is still a group of patient that have unpredictable risk for the development of contrast nephropathy (CN). There is also an effort to find more effficient strategies to prevent CN. Carvedilol, metoprolol and nebivolol seem to have theoretical potentials for the prevention of CN. In this study, we aimed to investigate their effects on the prevention of CN. We also aimed to define the risk factors associated with the development of CN in our study group. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, the patients were divided into four groups according to whether they were taking 25 mg/day carvedilol (n:56), 5 mg/day nebivolol (n:60), 50 mg/day metoprolol (n:68) or none (n:63). We made analysis to determine the agents’ efficiency on the prevention of CN. We also performed multiple logistic regression analysis including all groups to define the risk factors associated with CN. RESULTS: The incidents of CN were the lowest in the carvedilol group (4%) while the worst performance occurred in those taking metoprolol (10%). The difference between the groups in terms of the development of CN did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed age (p=0.003), higher triglyceride levels (p=0.011) and family history of coronary artery disease (p=0.038) to be the predictors of CN. CONCLUSION: In this study, we didn’t find any relation between the development of CN and carvedilol, metoprolol or nebivolol usage. We found age, higher levels of triglyceride and family history of coronary artery disease to be risk factors for predicting CN. Kare Publishing 2015-03 2014-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5337060/ /pubmed/25333980 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/akd.2014.5304 Text en Copyright © 2015 Turkish Society of Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Akgüllü, Çağdaş Eryılmaz, Ufuk Güngör, Hasan Huyut, Ahmet Zencir, Cemil Hekim, Tolga A clinical study about contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers |
title | A clinical study about contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers |
title_full | A clinical study about contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers |
title_fullStr | A clinical study about contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers |
title_full_unstemmed | A clinical study about contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers |
title_short | A clinical study about contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers |
title_sort | clinical study about contrast nephropathy: risk factors and the role of beta blockers |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25333980 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/akd.2014.5304 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akgullucagdas aclinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT eryılmazufuk aclinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT gungorhasan aclinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT huyutahmet aclinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT zencircemil aclinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT hekimtolga aclinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT akgullucagdas clinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT eryılmazufuk clinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT gungorhasan clinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT huyutahmet clinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT zencircemil clinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers AT hekimtolga clinicalstudyaboutcontrastnephropathyriskfactorsandtheroleofbetablockers |