Cargando…

Healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial

OBJECTIVES: Insight into healthcare professionals’ views and experiences of the use of ciclosporin and infliximab as salvage therapies for acute ulcerative colitis (UC) and how this may affect participation in a comparison trial is lacking. The study aimed to capture views and opinions of healthcare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clement, Clare, Rapport, Frances, Seagrove, Anne, Alrubaiy, Laith, Williams, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014512
_version_ 1782512414072242176
author Clement, Clare
Rapport, Frances
Seagrove, Anne
Alrubaiy, Laith
Williams, John
author_facet Clement, Clare
Rapport, Frances
Seagrove, Anne
Alrubaiy, Laith
Williams, John
author_sort Clement, Clare
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Insight into healthcare professionals’ views and experiences of the use of ciclosporin and infliximab as salvage therapies for acute ulcerative colitis (UC) and how this may affect participation in a comparison trial is lacking. The study aimed to capture views and opinions of healthcare professionals about the two drugs within the CONSTRUCT trial. DESIGN: An interview-based qualitative study using Framework Analysis embedded within an open-label, pragmatic randomised trial. SETTING: National Health Service Health Boards and Trusts, including large teaching and district hospitals in England, Scotland and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Principal Investigators (PIs) for trial sites (who were all consultant gastroenterologists) and nurses responsible for administering and monitoring the salvage therapy drugs across trial sites. 15 PIs and 8 nurses recruited from a range of sites stratified by site recruitment rates were interviewed. RESULTS: Interviews revealed that professionals made judgements regarding the salvage therapies largely based on experience of giving the two drugs and perceptions of effectiveness and adverse side effects. A clear preference for infliximab among nurses was revealed, largely based on experiences of administration and drug handling, with some doctors strongly favouring infliximab based on experience of prescribing the drug as well as patient views and the existing evidence base. Most doctors were more equivocal, and all were prepared to suspend preferences and wait for evidence of effectiveness and safety from the CONSTRUCT trial. PIs also questioned guidelines around drug use and restrictions placed on personal autonomy in delivering best patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight healthcare professionals’ preference for the salvage treatment, infliximab in treating steroid-resistant UC, largely based on resource intensive nursing requirements of intravenous administration of ciclosporin. Not all doctors expressed this preference, being more equivocal, and all professionals were content to suspend preferences within the CONSTRUCT trial and recognised the importance of establishing relative effectiveness and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 22663589.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5337666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53376662017-03-07 Healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial Clement, Clare Rapport, Frances Seagrove, Anne Alrubaiy, Laith Williams, John BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: Insight into healthcare professionals’ views and experiences of the use of ciclosporin and infliximab as salvage therapies for acute ulcerative colitis (UC) and how this may affect participation in a comparison trial is lacking. The study aimed to capture views and opinions of healthcare professionals about the two drugs within the CONSTRUCT trial. DESIGN: An interview-based qualitative study using Framework Analysis embedded within an open-label, pragmatic randomised trial. SETTING: National Health Service Health Boards and Trusts, including large teaching and district hospitals in England, Scotland and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Principal Investigators (PIs) for trial sites (who were all consultant gastroenterologists) and nurses responsible for administering and monitoring the salvage therapy drugs across trial sites. 15 PIs and 8 nurses recruited from a range of sites stratified by site recruitment rates were interviewed. RESULTS: Interviews revealed that professionals made judgements regarding the salvage therapies largely based on experience of giving the two drugs and perceptions of effectiveness and adverse side effects. A clear preference for infliximab among nurses was revealed, largely based on experiences of administration and drug handling, with some doctors strongly favouring infliximab based on experience of prescribing the drug as well as patient views and the existing evidence base. Most doctors were more equivocal, and all were prepared to suspend preferences and wait for evidence of effectiveness and safety from the CONSTRUCT trial. PIs also questioned guidelines around drug use and restrictions placed on personal autonomy in delivering best patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight healthcare professionals’ preference for the salvage treatment, infliximab in treating steroid-resistant UC, largely based on resource intensive nursing requirements of intravenous administration of ciclosporin. Not all doctors expressed this preference, being more equivocal, and all professionals were content to suspend preferences within the CONSTRUCT trial and recognised the importance of establishing relative effectiveness and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 22663589. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5337666/ /pubmed/28399515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014512 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Clement, Clare
Rapport, Frances
Seagrove, Anne
Alrubaiy, Laith
Williams, John
Healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial
title Healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial
title_full Healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial
title_fullStr Healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial
title_short Healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial
title_sort healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the construct trial
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014512
work_keys_str_mv AT clementclare healthcareprofessionalsviewsoftheuseandadministrationoftwosalvagetherapydrugsforacuteulcerativecolitisanestedqualitativestudywithintheconstructtrial
AT rapportfrances healthcareprofessionalsviewsoftheuseandadministrationoftwosalvagetherapydrugsforacuteulcerativecolitisanestedqualitativestudywithintheconstructtrial
AT seagroveanne healthcareprofessionalsviewsoftheuseandadministrationoftwosalvagetherapydrugsforacuteulcerativecolitisanestedqualitativestudywithintheconstructtrial
AT alrubaiylaith healthcareprofessionalsviewsoftheuseandadministrationoftwosalvagetherapydrugsforacuteulcerativecolitisanestedqualitativestudywithintheconstructtrial
AT williamsjohn healthcareprofessionalsviewsoftheuseandadministrationoftwosalvagetherapydrugsforacuteulcerativecolitisanestedqualitativestudywithintheconstructtrial