Cargando…
Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
OBJECTIVES: To summarise logistical aspects of recently completed systematic reviews that were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registry to quantify the time and resources required to complete such projects. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545 |
_version_ | 1782512421444780032 |
---|---|
author | Borah, Rohit Brown, Andrew W Capers, Patrice L Kaiser, Kathryn A |
author_facet | Borah, Rohit Brown, Andrew W Capers, Patrice L Kaiser, Kathryn A |
author_sort | Borah, Rohit |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To summarise logistical aspects of recently completed systematic reviews that were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registry to quantify the time and resources required to complete such projects. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: All of the 195 registered and completed reviews (status from the PROSPERO registry) with associated publications at the time of our search (1 July 2014). DATA EXTRACTION: All authors extracted data using registry entries and publication information related to the data sources used, the number of initially retrieved citations, the final number of included studies, the time between registration date to publication date and number of authors involved for completion of each publication. Information related to funding and geographical location was also recorded when reported. RESULTS: The mean estimated time to complete the project and publish the review was 67.3 weeks (IQR=42). The number of studies found in the literature searches ranged from 27 to 92 020; the mean yield rate of included studies was 2.94% (IQR=2.5); and the mean number of authors per review was 5, SD=3. Funded reviews took significantly longer to complete and publish (mean=42 vs 26 weeks) and involved more authors and team members (mean=6.8 vs 4.8 people) than those that did not report funding (both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic reviews presently take much time and require large amounts of human resources. In the light of the ever-increasing volume of published studies, application of existing computing and informatics technology should be applied to decrease this time and resource burden. We discuss recently published guidelines that provide a framework to make finding and accessing relevant literature less burdensome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5337708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53377082017-03-07 Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry Borah, Rohit Brown, Andrew W Capers, Patrice L Kaiser, Kathryn A BMJ Open Health Informatics OBJECTIVES: To summarise logistical aspects of recently completed systematic reviews that were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registry to quantify the time and resources required to complete such projects. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: All of the 195 registered and completed reviews (status from the PROSPERO registry) with associated publications at the time of our search (1 July 2014). DATA EXTRACTION: All authors extracted data using registry entries and publication information related to the data sources used, the number of initially retrieved citations, the final number of included studies, the time between registration date to publication date and number of authors involved for completion of each publication. Information related to funding and geographical location was also recorded when reported. RESULTS: The mean estimated time to complete the project and publish the review was 67.3 weeks (IQR=42). The number of studies found in the literature searches ranged from 27 to 92 020; the mean yield rate of included studies was 2.94% (IQR=2.5); and the mean number of authors per review was 5, SD=3. Funded reviews took significantly longer to complete and publish (mean=42 vs 26 weeks) and involved more authors and team members (mean=6.8 vs 4.8 people) than those that did not report funding (both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic reviews presently take much time and require large amounts of human resources. In the light of the ever-increasing volume of published studies, application of existing computing and informatics technology should be applied to decrease this time and resource burden. We discuss recently published guidelines that provide a framework to make finding and accessing relevant literature less burdensome. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5337708/ /pubmed/28242767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Informatics Borah, Rohit Brown, Andrew W Capers, Patrice L Kaiser, Kathryn A Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry |
title | Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry |
title_full | Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry |
title_fullStr | Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry |
title_short | Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry |
title_sort | analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the prospero registry |
topic | Health Informatics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borahrohit analysisofthetimeandworkersneededtoconductsystematicreviewsofmedicalinterventionsusingdatafromtheprosperoregistry AT brownandreww analysisofthetimeandworkersneededtoconductsystematicreviewsofmedicalinterventionsusingdatafromtheprosperoregistry AT caperspatricel analysisofthetimeandworkersneededtoconductsystematicreviewsofmedicalinterventionsusingdatafromtheprosperoregistry AT kaiserkathryna analysisofthetimeandworkersneededtoconductsystematicreviewsofmedicalinterventionsusingdatafromtheprosperoregistry |