Cargando…

Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry

OBJECTIVES: To summarise logistical aspects of recently completed systematic reviews that were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registry to quantify the time and resources required to complete such projects. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borah, Rohit, Brown, Andrew W, Capers, Patrice L, Kaiser, Kathryn A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545
_version_ 1782512421444780032
author Borah, Rohit
Brown, Andrew W
Capers, Patrice L
Kaiser, Kathryn A
author_facet Borah, Rohit
Brown, Andrew W
Capers, Patrice L
Kaiser, Kathryn A
author_sort Borah, Rohit
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To summarise logistical aspects of recently completed systematic reviews that were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registry to quantify the time and resources required to complete such projects. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: All of the 195 registered and completed reviews (status from the PROSPERO registry) with associated publications at the time of our search (1 July 2014). DATA EXTRACTION: All authors extracted data using registry entries and publication information related to the data sources used, the number of initially retrieved citations, the final number of included studies, the time between registration date to publication date and number of authors involved for completion of each publication. Information related to funding and geographical location was also recorded when reported. RESULTS: The mean estimated time to complete the project and publish the review was 67.3 weeks (IQR=42). The number of studies found in the literature searches ranged from 27 to 92 020; the mean yield rate of included studies was 2.94% (IQR=2.5); and the mean number of authors per review was 5, SD=3. Funded reviews took significantly longer to complete and publish (mean=42 vs 26 weeks) and involved more authors and team members (mean=6.8 vs 4.8 people) than those that did not report funding (both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic reviews presently take much time and require large amounts of human resources. In the light of the ever-increasing volume of published studies, application of existing computing and informatics technology should be applied to decrease this time and resource burden. We discuss recently published guidelines that provide a framework to make finding and accessing relevant literature less burdensome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5337708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53377082017-03-07 Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry Borah, Rohit Brown, Andrew W Capers, Patrice L Kaiser, Kathryn A BMJ Open Health Informatics OBJECTIVES: To summarise logistical aspects of recently completed systematic reviews that were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registry to quantify the time and resources required to complete such projects. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: All of the 195 registered and completed reviews (status from the PROSPERO registry) with associated publications at the time of our search (1 July 2014). DATA EXTRACTION: All authors extracted data using registry entries and publication information related to the data sources used, the number of initially retrieved citations, the final number of included studies, the time between registration date to publication date and number of authors involved for completion of each publication. Information related to funding and geographical location was also recorded when reported. RESULTS: The mean estimated time to complete the project and publish the review was 67.3 weeks (IQR=42). The number of studies found in the literature searches ranged from 27 to 92 020; the mean yield rate of included studies was 2.94% (IQR=2.5); and the mean number of authors per review was 5, SD=3. Funded reviews took significantly longer to complete and publish (mean=42 vs 26 weeks) and involved more authors and team members (mean=6.8 vs 4.8 people) than those that did not report funding (both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic reviews presently take much time and require large amounts of human resources. In the light of the ever-increasing volume of published studies, application of existing computing and informatics technology should be applied to decrease this time and resource burden. We discuss recently published guidelines that provide a framework to make finding and accessing relevant literature less burdensome. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5337708/ /pubmed/28242767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Informatics
Borah, Rohit
Brown, Andrew W
Capers, Patrice L
Kaiser, Kathryn A
Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
title Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
title_full Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
title_fullStr Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
title_short Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
title_sort analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the prospero registry
topic Health Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545
work_keys_str_mv AT borahrohit analysisofthetimeandworkersneededtoconductsystematicreviewsofmedicalinterventionsusingdatafromtheprosperoregistry
AT brownandreww analysisofthetimeandworkersneededtoconductsystematicreviewsofmedicalinterventionsusingdatafromtheprosperoregistry
AT caperspatricel analysisofthetimeandworkersneededtoconductsystematicreviewsofmedicalinterventionsusingdatafromtheprosperoregistry
AT kaiserkathryna analysisofthetimeandworkersneededtoconductsystematicreviewsofmedicalinterventionsusingdatafromtheprosperoregistry