Cargando…
Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot
OBJECTIVES: The Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We tested the psychometric properties of a modified version (CROQv2) when administered in a Nat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915 |
_version_ | 1782512422587727872 |
---|---|
author | Schroter, Sara Miles, Rebecca Green, Stephen Jackson, Mark |
author_facet | Schroter, Sara Miles, Rebecca Green, Stephen Jackson, Mark |
author_sort | Schroter, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We tested the psychometric properties of a modified version (CROQv2) when administered in a National Health Service (NHS)/Department of Health (DH) funded pilot of PROMs for coronary revascularisation. DESIGN: Psychometric validation study. SETTING: 11 English hospitals in the UK taking part in the NHS/DH funded pilot of PROMs for coronary revascularisation. PARTICIPANTS: Comprehensive analyses of acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness were conducted independently for each of the prerevascularisation (n=2685 and n=3711) and postrevascularisation (n=869 and n=837) versions of the CROQ-CABG and CROQ-PCI, respectively. RESULTS: All versions met prespecified stringent criteria for (1) acceptability of items (missing data) and scales (missing data, floor and ceiling effects, skewness); (2) tests of scaling assumptions; (3) reliability: internal consistency (Cronbach's α, item-total correlations); (4) construct validity based on within-scale analyses (internal consistency, intercorrelations between scales, factor analysis and hypothesis testing); (5) construct validity based on comparisons with external measures (convergent and discriminant validity and hypothesis testing) and (6) responsiveness. Results were also confirmed when tests were repeated on subsamples of CABG (n=639) and PCI (n=615) patients who reported receiving help completing prerevascularisation questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a psychometrically robust procedure-specific tool that could be used as part of a large-scale coronary revascularisation PROMs programme to capture the patients' perspective of coronary revascularisation will enable outcomes important to patients to be routinely collected alongside clinical outcomes. The CROQ is suitable for administration by postal survey or the prerevascularisation versions can be administered in the clinical setting as in the Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5337713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53377132017-03-07 Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot Schroter, Sara Miles, Rebecca Green, Stephen Jackson, Mark BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: The Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We tested the psychometric properties of a modified version (CROQv2) when administered in a National Health Service (NHS)/Department of Health (DH) funded pilot of PROMs for coronary revascularisation. DESIGN: Psychometric validation study. SETTING: 11 English hospitals in the UK taking part in the NHS/DH funded pilot of PROMs for coronary revascularisation. PARTICIPANTS: Comprehensive analyses of acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness were conducted independently for each of the prerevascularisation (n=2685 and n=3711) and postrevascularisation (n=869 and n=837) versions of the CROQ-CABG and CROQ-PCI, respectively. RESULTS: All versions met prespecified stringent criteria for (1) acceptability of items (missing data) and scales (missing data, floor and ceiling effects, skewness); (2) tests of scaling assumptions; (3) reliability: internal consistency (Cronbach's α, item-total correlations); (4) construct validity based on within-scale analyses (internal consistency, intercorrelations between scales, factor analysis and hypothesis testing); (5) construct validity based on comparisons with external measures (convergent and discriminant validity and hypothesis testing) and (6) responsiveness. Results were also confirmed when tests were repeated on subsamples of CABG (n=639) and PCI (n=615) patients who reported receiving help completing prerevascularisation questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a psychometrically robust procedure-specific tool that could be used as part of a large-scale coronary revascularisation PROMs programme to capture the patients' perspective of coronary revascularisation will enable outcomes important to patients to be routinely collected alongside clinical outcomes. The CROQ is suitable for administration by postal survey or the prerevascularisation versions can be administered in the clinical setting as in the Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5337713/ /pubmed/28246146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Schroter, Sara Miles, Rebecca Green, Stephen Jackson, Mark Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot |
title | Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot |
title_full | Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot |
title_fullStr | Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot |
title_short | Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot |
title_sort | psychometric validation of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (croqv2) in the context of the nhs coronary revascularisation proms pilot |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schrotersara psychometricvalidationofthecoronaryrevascularisationoutcomequestionnairecroqv2inthecontextofthenhscoronaryrevascularisationpromspilot AT milesrebecca psychometricvalidationofthecoronaryrevascularisationoutcomequestionnairecroqv2inthecontextofthenhscoronaryrevascularisationpromspilot AT greenstephen psychometricvalidationofthecoronaryrevascularisationoutcomequestionnairecroqv2inthecontextofthenhscoronaryrevascularisationpromspilot AT jacksonmark psychometricvalidationofthecoronaryrevascularisationoutcomequestionnairecroqv2inthecontextofthenhscoronaryrevascularisationpromspilot |