Cargando…

Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot

OBJECTIVES: The Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We tested the psychometric properties of a modified version (CROQv2) when administered in a Nat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schroter, Sara, Miles, Rebecca, Green, Stephen, Jackson, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915
_version_ 1782512422587727872
author Schroter, Sara
Miles, Rebecca
Green, Stephen
Jackson, Mark
author_facet Schroter, Sara
Miles, Rebecca
Green, Stephen
Jackson, Mark
author_sort Schroter, Sara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We tested the psychometric properties of a modified version (CROQv2) when administered in a National Health Service (NHS)/Department of Health (DH) funded pilot of PROMs for coronary revascularisation. DESIGN: Psychometric validation study. SETTING: 11 English hospitals in the UK taking part in the NHS/DH funded pilot of PROMs for coronary revascularisation. PARTICIPANTS: Comprehensive analyses of acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness were conducted independently for each of the prerevascularisation (n=2685 and n=3711) and postrevascularisation (n=869 and n=837) versions of the CROQ-CABG and CROQ-PCI, respectively. RESULTS: All versions met prespecified stringent criteria for (1) acceptability of items (missing data) and scales (missing data, floor and ceiling effects, skewness); (2) tests of scaling assumptions; (3) reliability: internal consistency (Cronbach's α, item-total correlations); (4) construct validity based on within-scale analyses (internal consistency, intercorrelations between scales, factor analysis and hypothesis testing); (5) construct validity based on comparisons with external measures (convergent and discriminant validity and hypothesis testing) and (6) responsiveness. Results were also confirmed when tests were repeated on subsamples of CABG (n=639) and PCI (n=615) patients who reported receiving help completing prerevascularisation questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a psychometrically robust procedure-specific tool that could be used as part of a large-scale coronary revascularisation PROMs programme to capture the patients' perspective of coronary revascularisation will enable outcomes important to patients to be routinely collected alongside clinical outcomes. The CROQ is suitable for administration by postal survey or the prerevascularisation versions can be administered in the clinical setting as in the Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5337713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53377132017-03-07 Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot Schroter, Sara Miles, Rebecca Green, Stephen Jackson, Mark BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: The Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We tested the psychometric properties of a modified version (CROQv2) when administered in a National Health Service (NHS)/Department of Health (DH) funded pilot of PROMs for coronary revascularisation. DESIGN: Psychometric validation study. SETTING: 11 English hospitals in the UK taking part in the NHS/DH funded pilot of PROMs for coronary revascularisation. PARTICIPANTS: Comprehensive analyses of acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness were conducted independently for each of the prerevascularisation (n=2685 and n=3711) and postrevascularisation (n=869 and n=837) versions of the CROQ-CABG and CROQ-PCI, respectively. RESULTS: All versions met prespecified stringent criteria for (1) acceptability of items (missing data) and scales (missing data, floor and ceiling effects, skewness); (2) tests of scaling assumptions; (3) reliability: internal consistency (Cronbach's α, item-total correlations); (4) construct validity based on within-scale analyses (internal consistency, intercorrelations between scales, factor analysis and hypothesis testing); (5) construct validity based on comparisons with external measures (convergent and discriminant validity and hypothesis testing) and (6) responsiveness. Results were also confirmed when tests were repeated on subsamples of CABG (n=639) and PCI (n=615) patients who reported receiving help completing prerevascularisation questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a psychometrically robust procedure-specific tool that could be used as part of a large-scale coronary revascularisation PROMs programme to capture the patients' perspective of coronary revascularisation will enable outcomes important to patients to be routinely collected alongside clinical outcomes. The CROQ is suitable for administration by postal survey or the prerevascularisation versions can be administered in the clinical setting as in the Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5337713/ /pubmed/28246146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Schroter, Sara
Miles, Rebecca
Green, Stephen
Jackson, Mark
Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot
title Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot
title_full Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot
title_fullStr Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot
title_short Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot
title_sort psychometric validation of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (croqv2) in the context of the nhs coronary revascularisation proms pilot
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915
work_keys_str_mv AT schrotersara psychometricvalidationofthecoronaryrevascularisationoutcomequestionnairecroqv2inthecontextofthenhscoronaryrevascularisationpromspilot
AT milesrebecca psychometricvalidationofthecoronaryrevascularisationoutcomequestionnairecroqv2inthecontextofthenhscoronaryrevascularisationpromspilot
AT greenstephen psychometricvalidationofthecoronaryrevascularisationoutcomequestionnairecroqv2inthecontextofthenhscoronaryrevascularisationpromspilot
AT jacksonmark psychometricvalidationofthecoronaryrevascularisationoutcomequestionnairecroqv2inthecontextofthenhscoronaryrevascularisationpromspilot