Cargando…

Comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Co-administration of a diuretic or calcium channel blocker with an ACE inhibitor are both preferred combinations in patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease (CKD). According to the available evidence, it is still unknown which combination plays a more active role in renal prot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Cheng, Zhou, Chenchen, Yang, Bo, Lv, Jiayi, Dai, Bing, Yu, Shengqiang, Wang, Yi, Zhao, Guanren, Mei, Changlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28237959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013672
_version_ 1782512423907885056
author Xue, Cheng
Zhou, Chenchen
Yang, Bo
Lv, Jiayi
Dai, Bing
Yu, Shengqiang
Wang, Yi
Zhao, Guanren
Mei, Changlin
author_facet Xue, Cheng
Zhou, Chenchen
Yang, Bo
Lv, Jiayi
Dai, Bing
Yu, Shengqiang
Wang, Yi
Zhao, Guanren
Mei, Changlin
author_sort Xue, Cheng
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Co-administration of a diuretic or calcium channel blocker with an ACE inhibitor are both preferred combinations in patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease (CKD). According to the available evidence, it is still unknown which combination plays a more active role in renal protection. We hypothesised that a combination of fosinopril and benidipine may delay the progression of CKD more effectively than a combination of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be a multicentred, prospective, double-blind, randomised parallel controlled trial for hypertensive CKD patients in China. Patients will be randomised to one of two treatment groups: a combination of benidipine 4–8 mg/day and fosinopril 20 mg/day; or a combination of HCTZ 12.5–25 mg/day and fosinopril 20 mg/day. Patients will be followed up for 24 months after a month's fosinopril run-in. There will be dose-titration after 1 and 2 months. The primary endpoint is changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline to month 24. Secondary endpoints include changes in home blood pressure (BP), ambulatory BP, proteinuria, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, and composite renal events in 24 months. Inclusion criteria are: age 18–80 years, non-dialysis CKD patients with eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), home BP >130 mm Hg systolic or BP >80 mm Hg diastolic at the screening and randomisation, and 24 hour proteinuria <3.5 g. Principal exclusions are hypertensive crisis, transplantation, cancer, severe diabetes complications, hyperkalaemia and severe allergy. The required sample size was 511 patients for detecting a difference in the change of eGFR (one sided α=0.025, power 1-β=0.90). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: BEAHIT (Benidipine and Hydrochlorothiazide in Fosinopril Treated Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Hypertension) was approved by Changzheng Hospital Ethics Committee (CZ-20160504-16). The outcomes will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02646397.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5337719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53377192017-03-07 Comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial Xue, Cheng Zhou, Chenchen Yang, Bo Lv, Jiayi Dai, Bing Yu, Shengqiang Wang, Yi Zhao, Guanren Mei, Changlin BMJ Open Urology INTRODUCTION: Co-administration of a diuretic or calcium channel blocker with an ACE inhibitor are both preferred combinations in patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease (CKD). According to the available evidence, it is still unknown which combination plays a more active role in renal protection. We hypothesised that a combination of fosinopril and benidipine may delay the progression of CKD more effectively than a combination of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be a multicentred, prospective, double-blind, randomised parallel controlled trial for hypertensive CKD patients in China. Patients will be randomised to one of two treatment groups: a combination of benidipine 4–8 mg/day and fosinopril 20 mg/day; or a combination of HCTZ 12.5–25 mg/day and fosinopril 20 mg/day. Patients will be followed up for 24 months after a month's fosinopril run-in. There will be dose-titration after 1 and 2 months. The primary endpoint is changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline to month 24. Secondary endpoints include changes in home blood pressure (BP), ambulatory BP, proteinuria, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, and composite renal events in 24 months. Inclusion criteria are: age 18–80 years, non-dialysis CKD patients with eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), home BP >130 mm Hg systolic or BP >80 mm Hg diastolic at the screening and randomisation, and 24 hour proteinuria <3.5 g. Principal exclusions are hypertensive crisis, transplantation, cancer, severe diabetes complications, hyperkalaemia and severe allergy. The required sample size was 511 patients for detecting a difference in the change of eGFR (one sided α=0.025, power 1-β=0.90). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: BEAHIT (Benidipine and Hydrochlorothiazide in Fosinopril Treated Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Hypertension) was approved by Changzheng Hospital Ethics Committee (CZ-20160504-16). The outcomes will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02646397. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5337719/ /pubmed/28237959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013672 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Urology
Xue, Cheng
Zhou, Chenchen
Yang, Bo
Lv, Jiayi
Dai, Bing
Yu, Shengqiang
Wang, Yi
Zhao, Guanren
Mei, Changlin
Comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28237959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013672
work_keys_str_mv AT xuecheng comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenbenidipineandhydrochlorothiazideinfosinopriltreatedhypertensivepatientswithchronickidneydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhouchenchen comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenbenidipineandhydrochlorothiazideinfosinopriltreatedhypertensivepatientswithchronickidneydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yangbo comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenbenidipineandhydrochlorothiazideinfosinopriltreatedhypertensivepatientswithchronickidneydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lvjiayi comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenbenidipineandhydrochlorothiazideinfosinopriltreatedhypertensivepatientswithchronickidneydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daibing comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenbenidipineandhydrochlorothiazideinfosinopriltreatedhypertensivepatientswithchronickidneydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yushengqiang comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenbenidipineandhydrochlorothiazideinfosinopriltreatedhypertensivepatientswithchronickidneydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wangyi comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenbenidipineandhydrochlorothiazideinfosinopriltreatedhypertensivepatientswithchronickidneydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhaoguanren comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenbenidipineandhydrochlorothiazideinfosinopriltreatedhypertensivepatientswithchronickidneydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meichanglin comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenbenidipineandhydrochlorothiazideinfosinopriltreatedhypertensivepatientswithchronickidneydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial