Cargando…

Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Nutrition therapy is an integral part of self-management education in patients with type 2 diabetes. Carbohydrates with a low glycemic index are recommended, but the ideal amount of carbohydrate in the diet is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis comparing diets containing low to moderat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snorgaard, Ole, Poulsen, Grith M, Andersen, Henning K, Astrup, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000354
_version_ 1782512427331485696
author Snorgaard, Ole
Poulsen, Grith M
Andersen, Henning K
Astrup, Arne
author_facet Snorgaard, Ole
Poulsen, Grith M
Andersen, Henning K
Astrup, Arne
author_sort Snorgaard, Ole
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Nutrition therapy is an integral part of self-management education in patients with type 2 diabetes. Carbohydrates with a low glycemic index are recommended, but the ideal amount of carbohydrate in the diet is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis comparing diets containing low to moderate amounts of carbohydrate (LCD) (energy percentage below 45%) to diets containing high amounts of carbohydrate (HCD) in subjects with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed Cochrane library databases, EMBASE, and MEDLINE in the period 2004–2014 for guidelines, meta-analyses, and randomized trials assessing the outcomes HbA1c, BMI, weight, LDL cholesterol, quality of life (QoL), and attrition. RESULTS: We identified 10 randomized trials comprising 1376 participants in total. In the first year of intervention, LCD was followed by a 0.34% lower HbA1c (3.7 mmol/mol) compared with HCD (95% CI 0.06 (0.7 mmol/mol), 0.63 (6.9 mmol/mol)). The greater the carbohydrate restriction, the greater the glucose-lowering effect (R=−0.85, p<0.01). At 1 year or later, however, HbA1c was similar in the 2 diet groups. The effect of the 2 types of diet on BMI/body weight, LDL cholesterol, QoL, and attrition rate was similar throughout interventions. LIMITATIONS: Glucose-lowering medication, the nutrition therapy, the amount of carbohydrate in the diet, glycemic index, fat and protein intake, baseline HbA1c, and adherence to the prescribed diets could all have affected the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Low to moderate carbohydrate diets have greater effect on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes compared with high-carbohydrate diets in the first year of intervention. The greater the carbohydrate restriction, the greater glucose lowering, a relationship that has not been demonstrated earlier. Apart from this lowering of HbA1c over the short term, there is no superiority of low-carbohydrate diets in terms of glycemic control, weight, or LDL cholesterol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5337734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53377342017-03-17 Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes Snorgaard, Ole Poulsen, Grith M Andersen, Henning K Astrup, Arne BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research OBJECTIVE: Nutrition therapy is an integral part of self-management education in patients with type 2 diabetes. Carbohydrates with a low glycemic index are recommended, but the ideal amount of carbohydrate in the diet is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis comparing diets containing low to moderate amounts of carbohydrate (LCD) (energy percentage below 45%) to diets containing high amounts of carbohydrate (HCD) in subjects with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed Cochrane library databases, EMBASE, and MEDLINE in the period 2004–2014 for guidelines, meta-analyses, and randomized trials assessing the outcomes HbA1c, BMI, weight, LDL cholesterol, quality of life (QoL), and attrition. RESULTS: We identified 10 randomized trials comprising 1376 participants in total. In the first year of intervention, LCD was followed by a 0.34% lower HbA1c (3.7 mmol/mol) compared with HCD (95% CI 0.06 (0.7 mmol/mol), 0.63 (6.9 mmol/mol)). The greater the carbohydrate restriction, the greater the glucose-lowering effect (R=−0.85, p<0.01). At 1 year or later, however, HbA1c was similar in the 2 diet groups. The effect of the 2 types of diet on BMI/body weight, LDL cholesterol, QoL, and attrition rate was similar throughout interventions. LIMITATIONS: Glucose-lowering medication, the nutrition therapy, the amount of carbohydrate in the diet, glycemic index, fat and protein intake, baseline HbA1c, and adherence to the prescribed diets could all have affected the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Low to moderate carbohydrate diets have greater effect on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes compared with high-carbohydrate diets in the first year of intervention. The greater the carbohydrate restriction, the greater glucose lowering, a relationship that has not been demonstrated earlier. Apart from this lowering of HbA1c over the short term, there is no superiority of low-carbohydrate diets in terms of glycemic control, weight, or LDL cholesterol. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5337734/ /pubmed/28316796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000354 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research
Snorgaard, Ole
Poulsen, Grith M
Andersen, Henning K
Astrup, Arne
Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes
title Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes
topic Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000354
work_keys_str_mv AT snorgaardole systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdietarycarbohydraterestrictioninpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT poulsengrithm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdietarycarbohydraterestrictioninpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT andersenhenningk systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdietarycarbohydraterestrictioninpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT astruparne systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdietarycarbohydraterestrictioninpatientswithtype2diabetes