Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fosfomycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Ontario

Background and Objective. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics traditionally used to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) is rising in Canada. We compared the cost-per-patient in Ontario of including fosfomycin (an antibiotic with a low resistance profile) as an option for first-line...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perrault, Louise, Dahan, Sybil, Iliza, Ange Christelle, LeLorier, Jacques, Zhanel, George G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6362804
_version_ 1782512454277791744
author Perrault, Louise
Dahan, Sybil
Iliza, Ange Christelle
LeLorier, Jacques
Zhanel, George G.
author_facet Perrault, Louise
Dahan, Sybil
Iliza, Ange Christelle
LeLorier, Jacques
Zhanel, George G.
author_sort Perrault, Louise
collection PubMed
description Background and Objective. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics traditionally used to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) is rising in Canada. We compared the cost-per-patient in Ontario of including fosfomycin (an antibiotic with a low resistance profile) as an option for first-line empirical treatment of uUTIs with current cost of treatment with sulfonamides, fluoroquinolones, and nitrofurantoin. Methods. A decision-tree model was used to perform a cost-minimization analysis. All possible outcomes of a uUTI caused by bacterial species treated with either sulfonamides, fluoroquinolones, nitrofurantoin, or fosfomycin were included. Results. In the base case analysis, the cost-per-patient for treating uUTI with fosfomycin was $105.12. This is similar to the cost-per-patient for each of the other currently reimbursed antibiotics (e.g., $96.19 for sulfonamides, $98.85 for fluoroquinolones, and $99.09 for nitrofurantoins). The weighted average cost-per-patient for treating uUTI was not substantially elevated with the inclusion of fosfomycin in the treatment landscape ($98.41 versus $98.29 with and without fosfomycin, resp.). The sensitivity analyses revealed that most (88.34%) of the potential variation in cost was associated with the probability of progressing to pyelonephritis and hospitalization for pyelonephritis. Conclusion. Fosfomycin in addition to being a safe and effective agent to treat uUTI has a low resistance profile, offers a single-dose treatment administration, and is similar in cost to other reimbursed antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5337864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53378642017-03-19 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fosfomycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Ontario Perrault, Louise Dahan, Sybil Iliza, Ange Christelle LeLorier, Jacques Zhanel, George G. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Research Article Background and Objective. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics traditionally used to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) is rising in Canada. We compared the cost-per-patient in Ontario of including fosfomycin (an antibiotic with a low resistance profile) as an option for first-line empirical treatment of uUTIs with current cost of treatment with sulfonamides, fluoroquinolones, and nitrofurantoin. Methods. A decision-tree model was used to perform a cost-minimization analysis. All possible outcomes of a uUTI caused by bacterial species treated with either sulfonamides, fluoroquinolones, nitrofurantoin, or fosfomycin were included. Results. In the base case analysis, the cost-per-patient for treating uUTI with fosfomycin was $105.12. This is similar to the cost-per-patient for each of the other currently reimbursed antibiotics (e.g., $96.19 for sulfonamides, $98.85 for fluoroquinolones, and $99.09 for nitrofurantoins). The weighted average cost-per-patient for treating uUTI was not substantially elevated with the inclusion of fosfomycin in the treatment landscape ($98.41 versus $98.29 with and without fosfomycin, resp.). The sensitivity analyses revealed that most (88.34%) of the potential variation in cost was associated with the probability of progressing to pyelonephritis and hospitalization for pyelonephritis. Conclusion. Fosfomycin in addition to being a safe and effective agent to treat uUTI has a low resistance profile, offers a single-dose treatment administration, and is similar in cost to other reimbursed antibiotics. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5337864/ /pubmed/28316632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6362804 Text en Copyright © 2017 Louise Perrault et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Perrault, Louise
Dahan, Sybil
Iliza, Ange Christelle
LeLorier, Jacques
Zhanel, George G.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fosfomycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Ontario
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fosfomycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Ontario
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fosfomycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Ontario
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fosfomycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Ontario
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fosfomycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Ontario
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fosfomycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Ontario
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of fosfomycin for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in ontario
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6362804
work_keys_str_mv AT perraultlouise costeffectivenessanalysisoffosfomycinfortreatmentofuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionsinontario
AT dahansybil costeffectivenessanalysisoffosfomycinfortreatmentofuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionsinontario
AT ilizaangechristelle costeffectivenessanalysisoffosfomycinfortreatmentofuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionsinontario
AT lelorierjacques costeffectivenessanalysisoffosfomycinfortreatmentofuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionsinontario
AT zhanelgeorgeg costeffectivenessanalysisoffosfomycinfortreatmentofuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionsinontario