Cargando…
Confinement Effects for Lithium Borohydride: Comparing Silica and Carbon Scaffolds
[Image: see text] LiBH(4) is a promising material for hydrogen storage and as a solid-state electrolyte for Li ion batteries. Confining LiBH(4) in porous scaffolds improves its hydrogen desorption kinetics, reversibility, and Li(+) conductivity, but little is known about the influence of the chemica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical
Society
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b13094 |
_version_ | 1782512485160452096 |
---|---|
author | Suwarno, Ngene, Peter Nale, Angeloclaudio Eggenhuisen, Tamara M. Oschatz, Martin Embs, Jan Peter Remhof, Arndt de Jongh, Petra E. |
author_facet | Suwarno, Ngene, Peter Nale, Angeloclaudio Eggenhuisen, Tamara M. Oschatz, Martin Embs, Jan Peter Remhof, Arndt de Jongh, Petra E. |
author_sort | Suwarno, |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] LiBH(4) is a promising material for hydrogen storage and as a solid-state electrolyte for Li ion batteries. Confining LiBH(4) in porous scaffolds improves its hydrogen desorption kinetics, reversibility, and Li(+) conductivity, but little is known about the influence of the chemical nature of the scaffold. Here, quasielastic neutron scattering and calorimetric measurements were used to study support effects for LiBH(4) confined in nanoporous silica and carbon scaffolds. Pore radii were varied from 8 Å to 20 nm, with increasing confinement effects observed with decreasing pore size. For similar pore sizes, the confinement effects were more pronounced for silica than for carbon scaffolds. The shift in the solid–solid phase transition temperature is much larger in silica than in carbon scaffolds with similar pore sizes. A LiBH(4) layer near the pore walls shows profoundly different phase behavior than crystalline LiBH(4). This layer thickness was 1.94 ± 0.13 nm for the silica and 1.41 ± 0.16 nm for the carbon scaffolds. Quasi-elastic neutron scattering confirmed that the fraction of LiBH(4) with high hydrogen mobility is larger for the silica than for the carbon nanoscaffold. These results clearly show that in addition to the pore size the chemical nature of the scaffold also plays a significant role in determining the hydrogen mobility and interfacial layer thickness in nanoconfined metal hydrides. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5338002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | American Chemical
Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53380022017-03-08 Confinement Effects for Lithium Borohydride: Comparing Silica and Carbon Scaffolds Suwarno, Ngene, Peter Nale, Angeloclaudio Eggenhuisen, Tamara M. Oschatz, Martin Embs, Jan Peter Remhof, Arndt de Jongh, Petra E. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces [Image: see text] LiBH(4) is a promising material for hydrogen storage and as a solid-state electrolyte for Li ion batteries. Confining LiBH(4) in porous scaffolds improves its hydrogen desorption kinetics, reversibility, and Li(+) conductivity, but little is known about the influence of the chemical nature of the scaffold. Here, quasielastic neutron scattering and calorimetric measurements were used to study support effects for LiBH(4) confined in nanoporous silica and carbon scaffolds. Pore radii were varied from 8 Å to 20 nm, with increasing confinement effects observed with decreasing pore size. For similar pore sizes, the confinement effects were more pronounced for silica than for carbon scaffolds. The shift in the solid–solid phase transition temperature is much larger in silica than in carbon scaffolds with similar pore sizes. A LiBH(4) layer near the pore walls shows profoundly different phase behavior than crystalline LiBH(4). This layer thickness was 1.94 ± 0.13 nm for the silica and 1.41 ± 0.16 nm for the carbon scaffolds. Quasi-elastic neutron scattering confirmed that the fraction of LiBH(4) with high hydrogen mobility is larger for the silica than for the carbon nanoscaffold. These results clearly show that in addition to the pore size the chemical nature of the scaffold also plays a significant role in determining the hydrogen mobility and interfacial layer thickness in nanoconfined metal hydrides. American Chemical Society 2017-02-02 2017-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5338002/ /pubmed/28286596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b13094 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Suwarno, Ngene, Peter Nale, Angeloclaudio Eggenhuisen, Tamara M. Oschatz, Martin Embs, Jan Peter Remhof, Arndt de Jongh, Petra E. Confinement Effects for Lithium Borohydride: Comparing Silica and Carbon Scaffolds |
title | Confinement Effects for Lithium Borohydride: Comparing
Silica and Carbon Scaffolds |
title_full | Confinement Effects for Lithium Borohydride: Comparing
Silica and Carbon Scaffolds |
title_fullStr | Confinement Effects for Lithium Borohydride: Comparing
Silica and Carbon Scaffolds |
title_full_unstemmed | Confinement Effects for Lithium Borohydride: Comparing
Silica and Carbon Scaffolds |
title_short | Confinement Effects for Lithium Borohydride: Comparing
Silica and Carbon Scaffolds |
title_sort | confinement effects for lithium borohydride: comparing
silica and carbon scaffolds |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b13094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suwarno confinementeffectsforlithiumborohydridecomparingsilicaandcarbonscaffolds AT ngenepeter confinementeffectsforlithiumborohydridecomparingsilicaandcarbonscaffolds AT naleangeloclaudio confinementeffectsforlithiumborohydridecomparingsilicaandcarbonscaffolds AT eggenhuisentamaram confinementeffectsforlithiumborohydridecomparingsilicaandcarbonscaffolds AT oschatzmartin confinementeffectsforlithiumborohydridecomparingsilicaandcarbonscaffolds AT embsjanpeter confinementeffectsforlithiumborohydridecomparingsilicaandcarbonscaffolds AT remhofarndt confinementeffectsforlithiumborohydridecomparingsilicaandcarbonscaffolds AT dejonghpetrae confinementeffectsforlithiumborohydridecomparingsilicaandcarbonscaffolds |