Cargando…
Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth
INTRODUCTION: The Van Herick method is a quick and easy way to estimate anterior chamber depth, which allows grading of patients according to the likelihood of having primary acute closed-angle glaucoma. However, as the test is highly subjective, measurements and thus grading may vary between observ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_142_2014 |
_version_ | 1782512497059692544 |
---|---|
author | Javed, Ahmed Loutfi, Mohamed Kaye, Stephen Batterbury, Mark |
author_facet | Javed, Ahmed Loutfi, Mohamed Kaye, Stephen Batterbury, Mark |
author_sort | Javed, Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Van Herick method is a quick and easy way to estimate anterior chamber depth, which allows grading of patients according to the likelihood of having primary acute closed-angle glaucoma. However, as the test is highly subjective, measurements and thus grading may vary between observers. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of variation of Van Herick scores among observers and to investigate agreement between temporal and nasal scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 observers measured the temporal and nasal Van Herick scores from 18 patients, grouped into cohorts at outpatient glaucoma and corneal clinic. Analysis of data involved assigning a patient to a Van Herick grade based on the median score and then determining the mean standard deviation and percentage consistency for each grade. RESULTS: We found that Grades 1 and 4 had a high mean percentage consistency (80% and 84.6%, respectively) and a low mean standard deviation (0.45 and 0.26, respectively). Grades 2 and 3 had low mean percentage consistencies (57.5 and 5, respectively) and high mean standard deviations (0.71 and 0.89, respectively). The temporal and nasal scores showed good agreement (κ = 0.61P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Van Herick score has a good interobserver reliability for Grades 1 and 4; however, Grades 2 and 3 require further tests such as gonioscopy or ocular coherence tomography. Temporal and nasal scores demonstrated good agreement; therefore, if the nasal score cannot be measured due to nasal bridge size, the temporal can be used as an approximation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5338061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53380612017-03-15 Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth Javed, Ahmed Loutfi, Mohamed Kaye, Stephen Batterbury, Mark Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Van Herick method is a quick and easy way to estimate anterior chamber depth, which allows grading of patients according to the likelihood of having primary acute closed-angle glaucoma. However, as the test is highly subjective, measurements and thus grading may vary between observers. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of variation of Van Herick scores among observers and to investigate agreement between temporal and nasal scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 observers measured the temporal and nasal Van Herick scores from 18 patients, grouped into cohorts at outpatient glaucoma and corneal clinic. Analysis of data involved assigning a patient to a Van Herick grade based on the median score and then determining the mean standard deviation and percentage consistency for each grade. RESULTS: We found that Grades 1 and 4 had a high mean percentage consistency (80% and 84.6%, respectively) and a low mean standard deviation (0.45 and 0.26, respectively). Grades 2 and 3 had low mean percentage consistencies (57.5 and 5, respectively) and high mean standard deviations (0.71 and 0.89, respectively). The temporal and nasal scores showed good agreement (κ = 0.61P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Van Herick score has a good interobserver reliability for Grades 1 and 4; however, Grades 2 and 3 require further tests such as gonioscopy or ocular coherence tomography. Temporal and nasal scores demonstrated good agreement; therefore, if the nasal score cannot be measured due to nasal bridge size, the temporal can be used as an approximation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5338061/ /pubmed/28298857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_142_2014 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Oman Ophthalmic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Javed, Ahmed Loutfi, Mohamed Kaye, Stephen Batterbury, Mark Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth |
title | Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth |
title_full | Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth |
title_fullStr | Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth |
title_full_unstemmed | Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth |
title_short | Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth |
title_sort | interobserver reliability when using the van herick method to measure anterior chamber depth |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_142_2014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT javedahmed interobserverreliabilitywhenusingthevanherickmethodtomeasureanteriorchamberdepth AT loutfimohamed interobserverreliabilitywhenusingthevanherickmethodtomeasureanteriorchamberdepth AT kayestephen interobserverreliabilitywhenusingthevanherickmethodtomeasureanteriorchamberdepth AT batterburymark interobserverreliabilitywhenusingthevanherickmethodtomeasureanteriorchamberdepth |