Cargando…

Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth

INTRODUCTION: The Van Herick method is a quick and easy way to estimate anterior chamber depth, which allows grading of patients according to the likelihood of having primary acute closed-angle glaucoma. However, as the test is highly subjective, measurements and thus grading may vary between observ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Javed, Ahmed, Loutfi, Mohamed, Kaye, Stephen, Batterbury, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298857
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_142_2014
_version_ 1782512497059692544
author Javed, Ahmed
Loutfi, Mohamed
Kaye, Stephen
Batterbury, Mark
author_facet Javed, Ahmed
Loutfi, Mohamed
Kaye, Stephen
Batterbury, Mark
author_sort Javed, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Van Herick method is a quick and easy way to estimate anterior chamber depth, which allows grading of patients according to the likelihood of having primary acute closed-angle glaucoma. However, as the test is highly subjective, measurements and thus grading may vary between observers. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of variation of Van Herick scores among observers and to investigate agreement between temporal and nasal scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 observers measured the temporal and nasal Van Herick scores from 18 patients, grouped into cohorts at outpatient glaucoma and corneal clinic. Analysis of data involved assigning a patient to a Van Herick grade based on the median score and then determining the mean standard deviation and percentage consistency for each grade. RESULTS: We found that Grades 1 and 4 had a high mean percentage consistency (80% and 84.6%, respectively) and a low mean standard deviation (0.45 and 0.26, respectively). Grades 2 and 3 had low mean percentage consistencies (57.5 and 5, respectively) and high mean standard deviations (0.71 and 0.89, respectively). The temporal and nasal scores showed good agreement (κ = 0.61P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Van Herick score has a good interobserver reliability for Grades 1 and 4; however, Grades 2 and 3 require further tests such as gonioscopy or ocular coherence tomography. Temporal and nasal scores demonstrated good agreement; therefore, if the nasal score cannot be measured due to nasal bridge size, the temporal can be used as an approximation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5338061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53380612017-03-15 Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth Javed, Ahmed Loutfi, Mohamed Kaye, Stephen Batterbury, Mark Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Van Herick method is a quick and easy way to estimate anterior chamber depth, which allows grading of patients according to the likelihood of having primary acute closed-angle glaucoma. However, as the test is highly subjective, measurements and thus grading may vary between observers. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of variation of Van Herick scores among observers and to investigate agreement between temporal and nasal scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 observers measured the temporal and nasal Van Herick scores from 18 patients, grouped into cohorts at outpatient glaucoma and corneal clinic. Analysis of data involved assigning a patient to a Van Herick grade based on the median score and then determining the mean standard deviation and percentage consistency for each grade. RESULTS: We found that Grades 1 and 4 had a high mean percentage consistency (80% and 84.6%, respectively) and a low mean standard deviation (0.45 and 0.26, respectively). Grades 2 and 3 had low mean percentage consistencies (57.5 and 5, respectively) and high mean standard deviations (0.71 and 0.89, respectively). The temporal and nasal scores showed good agreement (κ = 0.61P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Van Herick score has a good interobserver reliability for Grades 1 and 4; however, Grades 2 and 3 require further tests such as gonioscopy or ocular coherence tomography. Temporal and nasal scores demonstrated good agreement; therefore, if the nasal score cannot be measured due to nasal bridge size, the temporal can be used as an approximation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5338061/ /pubmed/28298857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_142_2014 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Oman Ophthalmic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Javed, Ahmed
Loutfi, Mohamed
Kaye, Stephen
Batterbury, Mark
Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth
title Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth
title_full Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth
title_fullStr Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth
title_short Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth
title_sort interobserver reliability when using the van herick method to measure anterior chamber depth
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298857
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_142_2014
work_keys_str_mv AT javedahmed interobserverreliabilitywhenusingthevanherickmethodtomeasureanteriorchamberdepth
AT loutfimohamed interobserverreliabilitywhenusingthevanherickmethodtomeasureanteriorchamberdepth
AT kayestephen interobserverreliabilitywhenusingthevanherickmethodtomeasureanteriorchamberdepth
AT batterburymark interobserverreliabilitywhenusingthevanherickmethodtomeasureanteriorchamberdepth