Cargando…

Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery atherosclerosis is an important risk factor for stroke. As such, quantitative imaging of carotid artery calcification, as a proxy of atherosclerosis, has become a cornerstone of current stroke research. Yet, population-based data comparing the computed tomography (CT) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mujaj, Blerim, Lorza, Andrés M. Arias, van Engelen, Arna, de Bruijne, Marleen, Franco, Oscar H., van der Lugt, Aad, Vernooij, Meike W., Bos, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28260526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0340-z
_version_ 1782512500712931328
author Mujaj, Blerim
Lorza, Andrés M. Arias
van Engelen, Arna
de Bruijne, Marleen
Franco, Oscar H.
van der Lugt, Aad
Vernooij, Meike W.
Bos, Daniel
author_facet Mujaj, Blerim
Lorza, Andrés M. Arias
van Engelen, Arna
de Bruijne, Marleen
Franco, Oscar H.
van der Lugt, Aad
Vernooij, Meike W.
Bos, Daniel
author_sort Mujaj, Blerim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Carotid artery atherosclerosis is an important risk factor for stroke. As such, quantitative imaging of carotid artery calcification, as a proxy of atherosclerosis, has become a cornerstone of current stroke research. Yet, population-based data comparing the computed tomography (CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for the detection and quantification of calcification remain scarce. METHODS: A total of 684 participants from the population-based Rotterdam Study underwent both a CT and CMR of the carotid artery bifurcation to quantify the amount of carotid artery calcification (mean interscan interval: 4.9 ± 1.2 years). We investigated the correlation between the amount of calcification measured on CT and CMR using Spearman’s correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plots, and linear regression. In addition, using logistic regression modeling, we assessed the association of CT and CMR based calcification volumes with a history of stroke. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between CT and CMR based calcification volumes (Spearman’s correlation coefficient:0.86, p-value ≤0.01). Bland-Altman analyses showed a good agreement, though CT based calcification volumes were systematically larger. Finally, calcification volume assessed with either imaging modality was associated with a history of stroke with similar effect estimates (odds ratio (OR) per 1-SD increase in calcification volume: 1.52 (95% CI:1.00;2.30) for CT, and 1.47 (95% CI:1.01;2.14) for CMR. CONCLUSION: CT based and CMR based volumes of carotid artery calcification are highly correlated, but CMR based calcification is systematically smaller than those obtained with CT. Despite this difference, both provide comparable information with regard to a history of stroke. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-017-0340-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5338077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53380772017-03-10 Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study Mujaj, Blerim Lorza, Andrés M. Arias van Engelen, Arna de Bruijne, Marleen Franco, Oscar H. van der Lugt, Aad Vernooij, Meike W. Bos, Daniel J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Carotid artery atherosclerosis is an important risk factor for stroke. As such, quantitative imaging of carotid artery calcification, as a proxy of atherosclerosis, has become a cornerstone of current stroke research. Yet, population-based data comparing the computed tomography (CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for the detection and quantification of calcification remain scarce. METHODS: A total of 684 participants from the population-based Rotterdam Study underwent both a CT and CMR of the carotid artery bifurcation to quantify the amount of carotid artery calcification (mean interscan interval: 4.9 ± 1.2 years). We investigated the correlation between the amount of calcification measured on CT and CMR using Spearman’s correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plots, and linear regression. In addition, using logistic regression modeling, we assessed the association of CT and CMR based calcification volumes with a history of stroke. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between CT and CMR based calcification volumes (Spearman’s correlation coefficient:0.86, p-value ≤0.01). Bland-Altman analyses showed a good agreement, though CT based calcification volumes were systematically larger. Finally, calcification volume assessed with either imaging modality was associated with a history of stroke with similar effect estimates (odds ratio (OR) per 1-SD increase in calcification volume: 1.52 (95% CI:1.00;2.30) for CT, and 1.47 (95% CI:1.01;2.14) for CMR. CONCLUSION: CT based and CMR based volumes of carotid artery calcification are highly correlated, but CMR based calcification is systematically smaller than those obtained with CT. Despite this difference, both provide comparable information with regard to a history of stroke. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-017-0340-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5338077/ /pubmed/28260526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0340-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mujaj, Blerim
Lorza, Andrés M. Arias
van Engelen, Arna
de Bruijne, Marleen
Franco, Oscar H.
van der Lugt, Aad
Vernooij, Meike W.
Bos, Daniel
Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study
title Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study
title_full Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study
title_fullStr Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study
title_short Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study
title_sort comparison of ct and cmr for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the rotterdam study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28260526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0340-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mujajblerim comparisonofctandcmrfordetectionandquantificationofcarotidarterycalcificationtherotterdamstudy
AT lorzaandresmarias comparisonofctandcmrfordetectionandquantificationofcarotidarterycalcificationtherotterdamstudy
AT vanengelenarna comparisonofctandcmrfordetectionandquantificationofcarotidarterycalcificationtherotterdamstudy
AT debruijnemarleen comparisonofctandcmrfordetectionandquantificationofcarotidarterycalcificationtherotterdamstudy
AT francooscarh comparisonofctandcmrfordetectionandquantificationofcarotidarterycalcificationtherotterdamstudy
AT vanderlugtaad comparisonofctandcmrfordetectionandquantificationofcarotidarterycalcificationtherotterdamstudy
AT vernooijmeikew comparisonofctandcmrfordetectionandquantificationofcarotidarterycalcificationtherotterdamstudy
AT bosdaniel comparisonofctandcmrfordetectionandquantificationofcarotidarterycalcificationtherotterdamstudy