Cargando…
Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different
There are large overlaps in cognitive deficits occurring in attention deficit disorder (ADD) and neurodevelopmental disorders like neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). This overlap is mostly based on clinical measures and not on in-depth analyses of neuronal mechanisms. However, the consideration of such...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43929 |
_version_ | 1782512515429695488 |
---|---|
author | Bluschke, Annet von der Hagen, Maja Papenhagen, Katharina Roessner, Veit Beste, Christian |
author_facet | Bluschke, Annet von der Hagen, Maja Papenhagen, Katharina Roessner, Veit Beste, Christian |
author_sort | Bluschke, Annet |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are large overlaps in cognitive deficits occurring in attention deficit disorder (ADD) and neurodevelopmental disorders like neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). This overlap is mostly based on clinical measures and not on in-depth analyses of neuronal mechanisms. However, the consideration of such neuronal underpinnings is crucial when aiming to integrate measures that can lead to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Inhibitory control deficits, for example, are a hallmark in ADD, but it is unclear how far there are similar deficits in NF1. We thus compared adolescent ADD and NF1 patients to healthy controls in a Go/Nogo task using behavioural and neurophysiological measures. Clinical measures of ADD-symptoms were not different between ADD and NF1. Only patients with ADD showed increased Nogo errors and reductions in components reflecting response inhibition (i.e. Nogo-P3). Early perceptual processes (P1) were changed in ADD and NF1. Clinically, patients with ADD and NF1 thus show strong similarities. This is not the case in regard to underlying cognitive control processes. This shows that in-depth analyses of neurophysiological processes are needed to determine whether the overlap between ADD and NF1 is as strong as assumed and to develop appropriate treatment strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5338250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53382502017-03-08 Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different Bluschke, Annet von der Hagen, Maja Papenhagen, Katharina Roessner, Veit Beste, Christian Sci Rep Article There are large overlaps in cognitive deficits occurring in attention deficit disorder (ADD) and neurodevelopmental disorders like neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). This overlap is mostly based on clinical measures and not on in-depth analyses of neuronal mechanisms. However, the consideration of such neuronal underpinnings is crucial when aiming to integrate measures that can lead to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Inhibitory control deficits, for example, are a hallmark in ADD, but it is unclear how far there are similar deficits in NF1. We thus compared adolescent ADD and NF1 patients to healthy controls in a Go/Nogo task using behavioural and neurophysiological measures. Clinical measures of ADD-symptoms were not different between ADD and NF1. Only patients with ADD showed increased Nogo errors and reductions in components reflecting response inhibition (i.e. Nogo-P3). Early perceptual processes (P1) were changed in ADD and NF1. Clinically, patients with ADD and NF1 thus show strong similarities. This is not the case in regard to underlying cognitive control processes. This shows that in-depth analyses of neurophysiological processes are needed to determine whether the overlap between ADD and NF1 is as strong as assumed and to develop appropriate treatment strategies. Nature Publishing Group 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5338250/ /pubmed/28262833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43929 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Bluschke, Annet von der Hagen, Maja Papenhagen, Katharina Roessner, Veit Beste, Christian Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different |
title | Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different |
title_full | Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different |
title_fullStr | Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different |
title_full_unstemmed | Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different |
title_short | Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different |
title_sort | response inhibition in attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43929 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bluschkeannet responseinhibitioninattentiondeficitdisorderandneurofibromatosistype1clinicallysimilarneurophysiologicallydifferent AT vonderhagenmaja responseinhibitioninattentiondeficitdisorderandneurofibromatosistype1clinicallysimilarneurophysiologicallydifferent AT papenhagenkatharina responseinhibitioninattentiondeficitdisorderandneurofibromatosistype1clinicallysimilarneurophysiologicallydifferent AT roessnerveit responseinhibitioninattentiondeficitdisorderandneurofibromatosistype1clinicallysimilarneurophysiologicallydifferent AT bestechristian responseinhibitioninattentiondeficitdisorderandneurofibromatosistype1clinicallysimilarneurophysiologicallydifferent |