Cargando…

Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different

There are large overlaps in cognitive deficits occurring in attention deficit disorder (ADD) and neurodevelopmental disorders like neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). This overlap is mostly based on clinical measures and not on in-depth analyses of neuronal mechanisms. However, the consideration of such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bluschke, Annet, von der Hagen, Maja, Papenhagen, Katharina, Roessner, Veit, Beste, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43929
_version_ 1782512515429695488
author Bluschke, Annet
von der Hagen, Maja
Papenhagen, Katharina
Roessner, Veit
Beste, Christian
author_facet Bluschke, Annet
von der Hagen, Maja
Papenhagen, Katharina
Roessner, Veit
Beste, Christian
author_sort Bluschke, Annet
collection PubMed
description There are large overlaps in cognitive deficits occurring in attention deficit disorder (ADD) and neurodevelopmental disorders like neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). This overlap is mostly based on clinical measures and not on in-depth analyses of neuronal mechanisms. However, the consideration of such neuronal underpinnings is crucial when aiming to integrate measures that can lead to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Inhibitory control deficits, for example, are a hallmark in ADD, but it is unclear how far there are similar deficits in NF1. We thus compared adolescent ADD and NF1 patients to healthy controls in a Go/Nogo task using behavioural and neurophysiological measures. Clinical measures of ADD-symptoms were not different between ADD and NF1. Only patients with ADD showed increased Nogo errors and reductions in components reflecting response inhibition (i.e. Nogo-P3). Early perceptual processes (P1) were changed in ADD and NF1. Clinically, patients with ADD and NF1 thus show strong similarities. This is not the case in regard to underlying cognitive control processes. This shows that in-depth analyses of neurophysiological processes are needed to determine whether the overlap between ADD and NF1 is as strong as assumed and to develop appropriate treatment strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5338250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53382502017-03-08 Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different Bluschke, Annet von der Hagen, Maja Papenhagen, Katharina Roessner, Veit Beste, Christian Sci Rep Article There are large overlaps in cognitive deficits occurring in attention deficit disorder (ADD) and neurodevelopmental disorders like neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). This overlap is mostly based on clinical measures and not on in-depth analyses of neuronal mechanisms. However, the consideration of such neuronal underpinnings is crucial when aiming to integrate measures that can lead to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Inhibitory control deficits, for example, are a hallmark in ADD, but it is unclear how far there are similar deficits in NF1. We thus compared adolescent ADD and NF1 patients to healthy controls in a Go/Nogo task using behavioural and neurophysiological measures. Clinical measures of ADD-symptoms were not different between ADD and NF1. Only patients with ADD showed increased Nogo errors and reductions in components reflecting response inhibition (i.e. Nogo-P3). Early perceptual processes (P1) were changed in ADD and NF1. Clinically, patients with ADD and NF1 thus show strong similarities. This is not the case in regard to underlying cognitive control processes. This shows that in-depth analyses of neurophysiological processes are needed to determine whether the overlap between ADD and NF1 is as strong as assumed and to develop appropriate treatment strategies. Nature Publishing Group 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5338250/ /pubmed/28262833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43929 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Bluschke, Annet
von der Hagen, Maja
Papenhagen, Katharina
Roessner, Veit
Beste, Christian
Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different
title Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different
title_full Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different
title_fullStr Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different
title_full_unstemmed Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different
title_short Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different
title_sort response inhibition in attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 – clinically similar, neurophysiologically different
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43929
work_keys_str_mv AT bluschkeannet responseinhibitioninattentiondeficitdisorderandneurofibromatosistype1clinicallysimilarneurophysiologicallydifferent
AT vonderhagenmaja responseinhibitioninattentiondeficitdisorderandneurofibromatosistype1clinicallysimilarneurophysiologicallydifferent
AT papenhagenkatharina responseinhibitioninattentiondeficitdisorderandneurofibromatosistype1clinicallysimilarneurophysiologicallydifferent
AT roessnerveit responseinhibitioninattentiondeficitdisorderandneurofibromatosistype1clinicallysimilarneurophysiologicallydifferent
AT bestechristian responseinhibitioninattentiondeficitdisorderandneurofibromatosistype1clinicallysimilarneurophysiologicallydifferent