Cargando…
Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation
BACKGROUND: The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has risen steadily, yet the rate of cardiac device infections (CDI) has disproportionately increased. Amongst all cardiac device infections, the pocket infection is the most challenging diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to improve dia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172384 |
_version_ | 1782512549851299840 |
---|---|
author | Lennerz, Carsten Vrazic, Hrvoje Haller, Bernhard Braun, Siegmund Petzold, Tobias Ott, Ilka Lennerz, Agnes Michel, Jonathan Blažek, Patrick Deisenhofer, Isabel Whittaker, Peter Kolb, Christof |
author_facet | Lennerz, Carsten Vrazic, Hrvoje Haller, Bernhard Braun, Siegmund Petzold, Tobias Ott, Ilka Lennerz, Agnes Michel, Jonathan Blažek, Patrick Deisenhofer, Isabel Whittaker, Peter Kolb, Christof |
author_sort | Lennerz, Carsten |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has risen steadily, yet the rate of cardiac device infections (CDI) has disproportionately increased. Amongst all cardiac device infections, the pocket infection is the most challenging diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to improve diagnosis of such pocket infection by identifying relevant biomarkers. METHODS: We enrolled 25 consecutive patients with invasively and microbiologically confirmed pocket infection. None of the patients had any confounding conditions. Pre-operative levels of 14 biomarkers were compared in infected and control (n = 50) patients. Our selected biomarkers included white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), lipopolysaccharide binding protein, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP), polymorphonuclear-elastase, presepsin, various interleukins, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). RESULTS: Of the 25 patients with isolated pocket infection (70±13years, 76% male, 40% ICDs), none presented with leukocytosis. In contrast, they had higher serum levels of HS-CRP (p = 0.019) and PCT (p = 0.010) than control patients. Median PCT-level was 0.06 ng/mL (IQR 0.03–0.07 ng/mL) in the study group versus 0.03 ng/mL (IQR 0.02–0.04 ng/mL) in controls. An optimized PCT cut-off value of 0.05 ng/mL suggests pocket infection with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 82%. In addition TNF-α- and GM-CSF-levels were lower in the study group. Other biomarkers did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of isolated pocket infections requires clinical awareness, physical examination, evaluation of blood cultures and echocardiography assessment. Nevertheless, measurement of PCT- and HS-CRP-levels can aid diagnosis. However, no conclusion can be drawn from normal WBC-values. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01619267 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5338770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53387702017-03-10 Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation Lennerz, Carsten Vrazic, Hrvoje Haller, Bernhard Braun, Siegmund Petzold, Tobias Ott, Ilka Lennerz, Agnes Michel, Jonathan Blažek, Patrick Deisenhofer, Isabel Whittaker, Peter Kolb, Christof PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has risen steadily, yet the rate of cardiac device infections (CDI) has disproportionately increased. Amongst all cardiac device infections, the pocket infection is the most challenging diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to improve diagnosis of such pocket infection by identifying relevant biomarkers. METHODS: We enrolled 25 consecutive patients with invasively and microbiologically confirmed pocket infection. None of the patients had any confounding conditions. Pre-operative levels of 14 biomarkers were compared in infected and control (n = 50) patients. Our selected biomarkers included white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), lipopolysaccharide binding protein, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP), polymorphonuclear-elastase, presepsin, various interleukins, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). RESULTS: Of the 25 patients with isolated pocket infection (70±13years, 76% male, 40% ICDs), none presented with leukocytosis. In contrast, they had higher serum levels of HS-CRP (p = 0.019) and PCT (p = 0.010) than control patients. Median PCT-level was 0.06 ng/mL (IQR 0.03–0.07 ng/mL) in the study group versus 0.03 ng/mL (IQR 0.02–0.04 ng/mL) in controls. An optimized PCT cut-off value of 0.05 ng/mL suggests pocket infection with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 82%. In addition TNF-α- and GM-CSF-levels were lower in the study group. Other biomarkers did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of isolated pocket infections requires clinical awareness, physical examination, evaluation of blood cultures and echocardiography assessment. Nevertheless, measurement of PCT- and HS-CRP-levels can aid diagnosis. However, no conclusion can be drawn from normal WBC-values. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01619267 Public Library of Science 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5338770/ /pubmed/28264059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172384 Text en © 2017 Lennerz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lennerz, Carsten Vrazic, Hrvoje Haller, Bernhard Braun, Siegmund Petzold, Tobias Ott, Ilka Lennerz, Agnes Michel, Jonathan Blažek, Patrick Deisenhofer, Isabel Whittaker, Peter Kolb, Christof Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation |
title | Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation |
title_full | Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation |
title_fullStr | Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation |
title_short | Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation |
title_sort | biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: a prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lennerzcarsten biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT vrazichrvoje biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT hallerbernhard biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT braunsiegmund biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT petzoldtobias biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT ottilka biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT lennerzagnes biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT micheljonathan biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT blazekpatrick biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT deisenhoferisabel biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT whittakerpeter biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation AT kolbchristof biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation |