Cargando…

Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation

BACKGROUND: The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has risen steadily, yet the rate of cardiac device infections (CDI) has disproportionately increased. Amongst all cardiac device infections, the pocket infection is the most challenging diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to improve dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lennerz, Carsten, Vrazic, Hrvoje, Haller, Bernhard, Braun, Siegmund, Petzold, Tobias, Ott, Ilka, Lennerz, Agnes, Michel, Jonathan, Blažek, Patrick, Deisenhofer, Isabel, Whittaker, Peter, Kolb, Christof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172384
_version_ 1782512549851299840
author Lennerz, Carsten
Vrazic, Hrvoje
Haller, Bernhard
Braun, Siegmund
Petzold, Tobias
Ott, Ilka
Lennerz, Agnes
Michel, Jonathan
Blažek, Patrick
Deisenhofer, Isabel
Whittaker, Peter
Kolb, Christof
author_facet Lennerz, Carsten
Vrazic, Hrvoje
Haller, Bernhard
Braun, Siegmund
Petzold, Tobias
Ott, Ilka
Lennerz, Agnes
Michel, Jonathan
Blažek, Patrick
Deisenhofer, Isabel
Whittaker, Peter
Kolb, Christof
author_sort Lennerz, Carsten
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has risen steadily, yet the rate of cardiac device infections (CDI) has disproportionately increased. Amongst all cardiac device infections, the pocket infection is the most challenging diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to improve diagnosis of such pocket infection by identifying relevant biomarkers. METHODS: We enrolled 25 consecutive patients with invasively and microbiologically confirmed pocket infection. None of the patients had any confounding conditions. Pre-operative levels of 14 biomarkers were compared in infected and control (n = 50) patients. Our selected biomarkers included white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), lipopolysaccharide binding protein, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP), polymorphonuclear-elastase, presepsin, various interleukins, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). RESULTS: Of the 25 patients with isolated pocket infection (70±13years, 76% male, 40% ICDs), none presented with leukocytosis. In contrast, they had higher serum levels of HS-CRP (p = 0.019) and PCT (p = 0.010) than control patients. Median PCT-level was 0.06 ng/mL (IQR 0.03–0.07 ng/mL) in the study group versus 0.03 ng/mL (IQR 0.02–0.04 ng/mL) in controls. An optimized PCT cut-off value of 0.05 ng/mL suggests pocket infection with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 82%. In addition TNF-α- and GM-CSF-levels were lower in the study group. Other biomarkers did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of isolated pocket infections requires clinical awareness, physical examination, evaluation of blood cultures and echocardiography assessment. Nevertheless, measurement of PCT- and HS-CRP-levels can aid diagnosis. However, no conclusion can be drawn from normal WBC-values. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01619267
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5338770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53387702017-03-10 Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation Lennerz, Carsten Vrazic, Hrvoje Haller, Bernhard Braun, Siegmund Petzold, Tobias Ott, Ilka Lennerz, Agnes Michel, Jonathan Blažek, Patrick Deisenhofer, Isabel Whittaker, Peter Kolb, Christof PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has risen steadily, yet the rate of cardiac device infections (CDI) has disproportionately increased. Amongst all cardiac device infections, the pocket infection is the most challenging diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to improve diagnosis of such pocket infection by identifying relevant biomarkers. METHODS: We enrolled 25 consecutive patients with invasively and microbiologically confirmed pocket infection. None of the patients had any confounding conditions. Pre-operative levels of 14 biomarkers were compared in infected and control (n = 50) patients. Our selected biomarkers included white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), lipopolysaccharide binding protein, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP), polymorphonuclear-elastase, presepsin, various interleukins, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). RESULTS: Of the 25 patients with isolated pocket infection (70±13years, 76% male, 40% ICDs), none presented with leukocytosis. In contrast, they had higher serum levels of HS-CRP (p = 0.019) and PCT (p = 0.010) than control patients. Median PCT-level was 0.06 ng/mL (IQR 0.03–0.07 ng/mL) in the study group versus 0.03 ng/mL (IQR 0.02–0.04 ng/mL) in controls. An optimized PCT cut-off value of 0.05 ng/mL suggests pocket infection with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 82%. In addition TNF-α- and GM-CSF-levels were lower in the study group. Other biomarkers did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of isolated pocket infections requires clinical awareness, physical examination, evaluation of blood cultures and echocardiography assessment. Nevertheless, measurement of PCT- and HS-CRP-levels can aid diagnosis. However, no conclusion can be drawn from normal WBC-values. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01619267 Public Library of Science 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5338770/ /pubmed/28264059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172384 Text en © 2017 Lennerz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lennerz, Carsten
Vrazic, Hrvoje
Haller, Bernhard
Braun, Siegmund
Petzold, Tobias
Ott, Ilka
Lennerz, Agnes
Michel, Jonathan
Blažek, Patrick
Deisenhofer, Isabel
Whittaker, Peter
Kolb, Christof
Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation
title Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation
title_full Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation
title_fullStr Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation
title_short Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation
title_sort biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: a prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172384
work_keys_str_mv AT lennerzcarsten biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT vrazichrvoje biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT hallerbernhard biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT braunsiegmund biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT petzoldtobias biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT ottilka biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT lennerzagnes biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT micheljonathan biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT blazekpatrick biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT deisenhoferisabel biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT whittakerpeter biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation
AT kolbchristof biomarkerbaseddiagnosisofpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpocketinfectionsaprospectivemulticentrecasecontrolevaluation