Cargando…

Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial on a 'minimal intervention' in Dutch army personnel with nonspecific low back pain [ISRCTN19334317]

BACKGROUND: Researchers from the Royal Netherlands Army are studying the potential of isolated lumbar extensor training in low back pain in their working population. Currently, a randomized controlled trial is carried out in five military health centers in The Netherlands and Germany, in which a 10-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helmhout, Pieter H, Harts, Chris C, Staal, J Bart, de Bie, Rob A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC533884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15535881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-5-40
_version_ 1782121995368923136
author Helmhout, Pieter H
Harts, Chris C
Staal, J Bart
de Bie, Rob A
author_facet Helmhout, Pieter H
Harts, Chris C
Staal, J Bart
de Bie, Rob A
author_sort Helmhout, Pieter H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Researchers from the Royal Netherlands Army are studying the potential of isolated lumbar extensor training in low back pain in their working population. Currently, a randomized controlled trial is carried out in five military health centers in The Netherlands and Germany, in which a 10-week program of not more than 2 training sessions (10–15 minutes) per week is studied in soldiers with nonspecific low back pain for more than 4 weeks. The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy of this 'minimal intervention program', compared to usual care. Moreover, attempts are made to identify subgroups of different responders to the intervention. METHODS: Besides a baseline measurement, follow-up data are gathered at two short-term intervals (5 and 10 weeks after randomization) and two long-term intervals (6 months and one year after the end of the intervention), respectively. At every test moment, participants fill out a compound questionnaire on a stand-alone PC, and they undergo an isometric back strength measurement on a lower back machine. Primary outcome measures in this study are: self-assessed degree of complaints and degree of handicap in daily activities due to back pain. In addition, our secondary measurements focus on: fear of movement/(re-) injury, mental and social health perception, individual back extension strength, and satisfaction of the patient with the treatment perceived. Finally, we assess a number of potential prognostic factors: demographic and job characteristics, overall health, the degree of physical activity, and the attitudes and beliefs of the physiotherapist towards chronic low back pain. DISCUSSION: Although a substantial number of trials have been conducted that included lumbar extension training in low back pain patients, hardly any study has emphasized a minimal intervention approach comparable to ours. For reasons of time efficiency and patient preferences, this minimal sports medicine approach of low back pain management is interesting for the population under study, and possibly for comparable working populations with physical demanding job activities.
format Text
id pubmed-533884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5338842004-11-26 Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial on a 'minimal intervention' in Dutch army personnel with nonspecific low back pain [ISRCTN19334317] Helmhout, Pieter H Harts, Chris C Staal, J Bart de Bie, Rob A BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Researchers from the Royal Netherlands Army are studying the potential of isolated lumbar extensor training in low back pain in their working population. Currently, a randomized controlled trial is carried out in five military health centers in The Netherlands and Germany, in which a 10-week program of not more than 2 training sessions (10–15 minutes) per week is studied in soldiers with nonspecific low back pain for more than 4 weeks. The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy of this 'minimal intervention program', compared to usual care. Moreover, attempts are made to identify subgroups of different responders to the intervention. METHODS: Besides a baseline measurement, follow-up data are gathered at two short-term intervals (5 and 10 weeks after randomization) and two long-term intervals (6 months and one year after the end of the intervention), respectively. At every test moment, participants fill out a compound questionnaire on a stand-alone PC, and they undergo an isometric back strength measurement on a lower back machine. Primary outcome measures in this study are: self-assessed degree of complaints and degree of handicap in daily activities due to back pain. In addition, our secondary measurements focus on: fear of movement/(re-) injury, mental and social health perception, individual back extension strength, and satisfaction of the patient with the treatment perceived. Finally, we assess a number of potential prognostic factors: demographic and job characteristics, overall health, the degree of physical activity, and the attitudes and beliefs of the physiotherapist towards chronic low back pain. DISCUSSION: Although a substantial number of trials have been conducted that included lumbar extension training in low back pain patients, hardly any study has emphasized a minimal intervention approach comparable to ours. For reasons of time efficiency and patient preferences, this minimal sports medicine approach of low back pain management is interesting for the population under study, and possibly for comparable working populations with physical demanding job activities. BioMed Central 2004-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC533884/ /pubmed/15535881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-5-40 Text en Copyright © 2004 Helmhout et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Helmhout, Pieter H
Harts, Chris C
Staal, J Bart
de Bie, Rob A
Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial on a 'minimal intervention' in Dutch army personnel with nonspecific low back pain [ISRCTN19334317]
title Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial on a 'minimal intervention' in Dutch army personnel with nonspecific low back pain [ISRCTN19334317]
title_full Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial on a 'minimal intervention' in Dutch army personnel with nonspecific low back pain [ISRCTN19334317]
title_fullStr Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial on a 'minimal intervention' in Dutch army personnel with nonspecific low back pain [ISRCTN19334317]
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial on a 'minimal intervention' in Dutch army personnel with nonspecific low back pain [ISRCTN19334317]
title_short Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial on a 'minimal intervention' in Dutch army personnel with nonspecific low back pain [ISRCTN19334317]
title_sort rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial on a 'minimal intervention' in dutch army personnel with nonspecific low back pain [isrctn19334317]
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC533884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15535881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-5-40
work_keys_str_mv AT helmhoutpieterh rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialonaminimalinterventionindutcharmypersonnelwithnonspecificlowbackpainisrctn19334317
AT hartschrisc rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialonaminimalinterventionindutcharmypersonnelwithnonspecificlowbackpainisrctn19334317
AT staaljbart rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialonaminimalinterventionindutcharmypersonnelwithnonspecificlowbackpainisrctn19334317
AT debieroba rationaleanddesignofamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialonaminimalinterventionindutcharmypersonnelwithnonspecificlowbackpainisrctn19334317