Cargando…

Comparison of Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST Version 2 for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses

Owing to advancements in molecular diagnostics, recent years have seen an increasing number of laboratories adopting respiratory viral panels to detect respiratory pathogens. In December 2015, the NxTAG respiratory pathogen panel (NxTAG RPP) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Chun Kiat, Lee, Hong Kai, Ng, Christopher Wei Siong, Chiu, Lily, Tang, Julian Wei-Tze, Loh, Tze Ping, Koay, Evelyn Siew-Chuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5339100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2017.37.3.267
_version_ 1782512611285270528
author Lee, Chun Kiat
Lee, Hong Kai
Ng, Christopher Wei Siong
Chiu, Lily
Tang, Julian Wei-Tze
Loh, Tze Ping
Koay, Evelyn Siew-Chuan
author_facet Lee, Chun Kiat
Lee, Hong Kai
Ng, Christopher Wei Siong
Chiu, Lily
Tang, Julian Wei-Tze
Loh, Tze Ping
Koay, Evelyn Siew-Chuan
author_sort Lee, Chun Kiat
collection PubMed
description Owing to advancements in molecular diagnostics, recent years have seen an increasing number of laboratories adopting respiratory viral panels to detect respiratory pathogens. In December 2015, the NxTAG respiratory pathogen panel (NxTAG RPP) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. We compared the clinical performance of this new assay with that of the xTAG respiratory viral panel (xTAG RVP) FAST v2 using 142 clinical samples and 12 external quality assessment samples. Discordant results were resolved by using a laboratory-developed respiratory viral panel. The NxTAG RPP achieved 100% concordant negative results and 86.6% concordant positive results. It detected one coronavirus 229E and eight influenza A/H3N2 viruses that were missed by the xTAG RVP FAST v2. On the other hand, the NxTAG RPP missed one enterovirus/rhinovirus and one metapneumovirus that were detected by FAST v2. Both panels correctly identified all the pathogens in the 12 external quality assessment samples. Overall, the NxTAG RPP demonstrated good diagnostic performance. Of note, it was better able to subtype the influenza A/H3N2 viruses compared with the xTAG RVP FAST v2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5339100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53391002017-05-01 Comparison of Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST Version 2 for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses Lee, Chun Kiat Lee, Hong Kai Ng, Christopher Wei Siong Chiu, Lily Tang, Julian Wei-Tze Loh, Tze Ping Koay, Evelyn Siew-Chuan Ann Lab Med Brief Communication Owing to advancements in molecular diagnostics, recent years have seen an increasing number of laboratories adopting respiratory viral panels to detect respiratory pathogens. In December 2015, the NxTAG respiratory pathogen panel (NxTAG RPP) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. We compared the clinical performance of this new assay with that of the xTAG respiratory viral panel (xTAG RVP) FAST v2 using 142 clinical samples and 12 external quality assessment samples. Discordant results were resolved by using a laboratory-developed respiratory viral panel. The NxTAG RPP achieved 100% concordant negative results and 86.6% concordant positive results. It detected one coronavirus 229E and eight influenza A/H3N2 viruses that were missed by the xTAG RVP FAST v2. On the other hand, the NxTAG RPP missed one enterovirus/rhinovirus and one metapneumovirus that were detected by FAST v2. Both panels correctly identified all the pathogens in the 12 external quality assessment samples. Overall, the NxTAG RPP demonstrated good diagnostic performance. Of note, it was better able to subtype the influenza A/H3N2 viruses compared with the xTAG RVP FAST v2. The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2017-05 2017-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5339100/ /pubmed/28224774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2017.37.3.267 Text en © The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Lee, Chun Kiat
Lee, Hong Kai
Ng, Christopher Wei Siong
Chiu, Lily
Tang, Julian Wei-Tze
Loh, Tze Ping
Koay, Evelyn Siew-Chuan
Comparison of Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST Version 2 for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses
title Comparison of Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST Version 2 for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses
title_full Comparison of Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST Version 2 for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses
title_fullStr Comparison of Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST Version 2 for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST Version 2 for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses
title_short Comparison of Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST Version 2 for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses
title_sort comparison of luminex nxtag respiratory pathogen panel and xtag respiratory viral panel fast version 2 for the detection of respiratory viruses
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5339100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2017.37.3.267
work_keys_str_mv AT leechunkiat comparisonofluminexnxtagrespiratorypathogenpanelandxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastversion2forthedetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT leehongkai comparisonofluminexnxtagrespiratorypathogenpanelandxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastversion2forthedetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT ngchristopherweisiong comparisonofluminexnxtagrespiratorypathogenpanelandxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastversion2forthedetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT chiulily comparisonofluminexnxtagrespiratorypathogenpanelandxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastversion2forthedetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT tangjulianweitze comparisonofluminexnxtagrespiratorypathogenpanelandxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastversion2forthedetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT lohtzeping comparisonofluminexnxtagrespiratorypathogenpanelandxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastversion2forthedetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT koayevelynsiewchuan comparisonofluminexnxtagrespiratorypathogenpanelandxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastversion2forthedetectionofrespiratoryviruses