Cargando…

Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification

Ureolytic bacteria are key organisms in the rumen producing urease enzymes to catalyze the breakdown of urea to ammonia for the synthesis of microbial protein. However, little is known about the diversity and distribution of rumen ureolytic microorganisms. The urease gene (ureC) has been the target...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Di, Zhao, Shengguo, Zheng, Nan, Bu, Dengpan, Beckers, Yves, Denman, Stuart E., McSweeney, Christopher S., Wang, Jiaqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5339240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00385
_version_ 1782512619217747968
author Jin, Di
Zhao, Shengguo
Zheng, Nan
Bu, Dengpan
Beckers, Yves
Denman, Stuart E.
McSweeney, Christopher S.
Wang, Jiaqi
author_facet Jin, Di
Zhao, Shengguo
Zheng, Nan
Bu, Dengpan
Beckers, Yves
Denman, Stuart E.
McSweeney, Christopher S.
Wang, Jiaqi
author_sort Jin, Di
collection PubMed
description Ureolytic bacteria are key organisms in the rumen producing urease enzymes to catalyze the breakdown of urea to ammonia for the synthesis of microbial protein. However, little is known about the diversity and distribution of rumen ureolytic microorganisms. The urease gene (ureC) has been the target gene of choice for analysis of the urea-degrading microorganisms in various environments. In this study, we investigated the predominant ureC genes of the ureolytic bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows using high-throughput sequencing. Six dairy cows with rumen fistulas were assigned to a two-period cross-over trial. A control group (n = 3) were fed a total mixed ration without urea and the treatment group (n = 3) were fed rations plus 180 g urea per cow per day at three separate times. Rumen bacterial samples from liquid and solid digesta and rumen wall fractions were collected for ureC gene amplification and sequencing using Miseq. The wall-adherent bacteria (WAB) had a distinct ureolytic bacterial profile compared to the solid-adherent bacteria (SAB) and liquid-associated bacteria (LAB) but more than 55% of the ureC sequences did not affiliate with any known taxonomically assigned urease genes. Diversity analysis of the ureC genes showed that the Shannon and Chao1 indices for the rumen WAB was lower than those observed for the SAB and LAB (P < 0.01). The most abundant ureC genes were affiliated with Methylococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Paenibacillaceae, Helicobacteraceae, and Methylophilaceae families. Compared with the rumen LAB and SAB, relative abundance of the OTUs affiliated with Methylophilus and Marinobacter genera were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the WAB. Supplementation with urea did not alter the composition of the detected ureolytic bacteria. This study has identified significant populations of ureolytic WAB representing genera that have not been recognized or studied previously in the rumen. The taxonomic classification of rumen ureC genes in the dairy cow indicates that the majority of ureolytic bacteria are yet to be identified. This survey has expanded our knowledge of ureC gene information relating to the rumen ureolytic microbial community, and provides a basis for obtaining regulatory targets of ureolytic bacteria to moderate urea hydrolysis in the rumen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5339240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53392402017-03-21 Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification Jin, Di Zhao, Shengguo Zheng, Nan Bu, Dengpan Beckers, Yves Denman, Stuart E. McSweeney, Christopher S. Wang, Jiaqi Front Microbiol Microbiology Ureolytic bacteria are key organisms in the rumen producing urease enzymes to catalyze the breakdown of urea to ammonia for the synthesis of microbial protein. However, little is known about the diversity and distribution of rumen ureolytic microorganisms. The urease gene (ureC) has been the target gene of choice for analysis of the urea-degrading microorganisms in various environments. In this study, we investigated the predominant ureC genes of the ureolytic bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows using high-throughput sequencing. Six dairy cows with rumen fistulas were assigned to a two-period cross-over trial. A control group (n = 3) were fed a total mixed ration without urea and the treatment group (n = 3) were fed rations plus 180 g urea per cow per day at three separate times. Rumen bacterial samples from liquid and solid digesta and rumen wall fractions were collected for ureC gene amplification and sequencing using Miseq. The wall-adherent bacteria (WAB) had a distinct ureolytic bacterial profile compared to the solid-adherent bacteria (SAB) and liquid-associated bacteria (LAB) but more than 55% of the ureC sequences did not affiliate with any known taxonomically assigned urease genes. Diversity analysis of the ureC genes showed that the Shannon and Chao1 indices for the rumen WAB was lower than those observed for the SAB and LAB (P < 0.01). The most abundant ureC genes were affiliated with Methylococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Paenibacillaceae, Helicobacteraceae, and Methylophilaceae families. Compared with the rumen LAB and SAB, relative abundance of the OTUs affiliated with Methylophilus and Marinobacter genera were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the WAB. Supplementation with urea did not alter the composition of the detected ureolytic bacteria. This study has identified significant populations of ureolytic WAB representing genera that have not been recognized or studied previously in the rumen. The taxonomic classification of rumen ureC genes in the dairy cow indicates that the majority of ureolytic bacteria are yet to be identified. This survey has expanded our knowledge of ureC gene information relating to the rumen ureolytic microbial community, and provides a basis for obtaining regulatory targets of ureolytic bacteria to moderate urea hydrolysis in the rumen. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5339240/ /pubmed/28326079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00385 Text en Copyright © 2017 Jin, Zhao, Zheng, Bu, Beckers, Denman, McSweeney and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Jin, Di
Zhao, Shengguo
Zheng, Nan
Bu, Dengpan
Beckers, Yves
Denman, Stuart E.
McSweeney, Christopher S.
Wang, Jiaqi
Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification
title Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification
title_full Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification
title_fullStr Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification
title_short Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification
title_sort differences in ureolytic bacterial composition between the rumen digesta and rumen wall based on urec gene classification
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5339240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00385
work_keys_str_mv AT jindi differencesinureolyticbacterialcompositionbetweentherumendigestaandrumenwallbasedonurecgeneclassification
AT zhaoshengguo differencesinureolyticbacterialcompositionbetweentherumendigestaandrumenwallbasedonurecgeneclassification
AT zhengnan differencesinureolyticbacterialcompositionbetweentherumendigestaandrumenwallbasedonurecgeneclassification
AT budengpan differencesinureolyticbacterialcompositionbetweentherumendigestaandrumenwallbasedonurecgeneclassification
AT beckersyves differencesinureolyticbacterialcompositionbetweentherumendigestaandrumenwallbasedonurecgeneclassification
AT denmanstuarte differencesinureolyticbacterialcompositionbetweentherumendigestaandrumenwallbasedonurecgeneclassification
AT mcsweeneychristophers differencesinureolyticbacterialcompositionbetweentherumendigestaandrumenwallbasedonurecgeneclassification
AT wangjiaqi differencesinureolyticbacterialcompositionbetweentherumendigestaandrumenwallbasedonurecgeneclassification