Cargando…

Improving EEG-Based Driver Fatigue Classification Using Sparse-Deep Belief Networks

This paper presents an improvement of classification performance for electroencephalography (EEG)-based driver fatigue classification between fatigue and alert states with the data collected from 43 participants. The system employs autoregressive (AR) modeling as the features extraction algorithm, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chai, Rifai, Ling, Sai Ho, San, Phyo Phyo, Naik, Ganesh R., Nguyen, Tuan N., Tran, Yvonne, Craig, Ashley, Nguyen, Hung T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5339284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326009
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00103
_version_ 1782512629392080896
author Chai, Rifai
Ling, Sai Ho
San, Phyo Phyo
Naik, Ganesh R.
Nguyen, Tuan N.
Tran, Yvonne
Craig, Ashley
Nguyen, Hung T.
author_facet Chai, Rifai
Ling, Sai Ho
San, Phyo Phyo
Naik, Ganesh R.
Nguyen, Tuan N.
Tran, Yvonne
Craig, Ashley
Nguyen, Hung T.
author_sort Chai, Rifai
collection PubMed
description This paper presents an improvement of classification performance for electroencephalography (EEG)-based driver fatigue classification between fatigue and alert states with the data collected from 43 participants. The system employs autoregressive (AR) modeling as the features extraction algorithm, and sparse-deep belief networks (sparse-DBN) as the classification algorithm. Compared to other classifiers, sparse-DBN is a semi supervised learning method which combines unsupervised learning for modeling features in the pre-training layer and supervised learning for classification in the following layer. The sparsity in sparse-DBN is achieved with a regularization term that penalizes a deviation of the expected activation of hidden units from a fixed low-level prevents the network from overfitting and is able to learn low-level structures as well as high-level structures. For comparison, the artificial neural networks (ANN), Bayesian neural networks (BNN), and original deep belief networks (DBN) classifiers are used. The classification results show that using AR feature extractor and DBN classifiers, the classification performance achieves an improved classification performance with a of sensitivity of 90.8%, a specificity of 90.4%, an accuracy of 90.6%, and an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.94 compared to ANN (sensitivity at 80.8%, specificity at 77.8%, accuracy at 79.3% with AUC-ROC of 0.83) and BNN classifiers (sensitivity at 84.3%, specificity at 83%, accuracy at 83.6% with AUROC of 0.87). Using the sparse-DBN classifier, the classification performance improved further with sensitivity of 93.9%, a specificity of 92.3%, and an accuracy of 93.1% with AUROC of 0.96. Overall, the sparse-DBN classifier improved accuracy by 13.8, 9.5, and 2.5% over ANN, BNN, and DBN classifiers, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5339284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53392842017-03-21 Improving EEG-Based Driver Fatigue Classification Using Sparse-Deep Belief Networks Chai, Rifai Ling, Sai Ho San, Phyo Phyo Naik, Ganesh R. Nguyen, Tuan N. Tran, Yvonne Craig, Ashley Nguyen, Hung T. Front Neurosci Neuroscience This paper presents an improvement of classification performance for electroencephalography (EEG)-based driver fatigue classification between fatigue and alert states with the data collected from 43 participants. The system employs autoregressive (AR) modeling as the features extraction algorithm, and sparse-deep belief networks (sparse-DBN) as the classification algorithm. Compared to other classifiers, sparse-DBN is a semi supervised learning method which combines unsupervised learning for modeling features in the pre-training layer and supervised learning for classification in the following layer. The sparsity in sparse-DBN is achieved with a regularization term that penalizes a deviation of the expected activation of hidden units from a fixed low-level prevents the network from overfitting and is able to learn low-level structures as well as high-level structures. For comparison, the artificial neural networks (ANN), Bayesian neural networks (BNN), and original deep belief networks (DBN) classifiers are used. The classification results show that using AR feature extractor and DBN classifiers, the classification performance achieves an improved classification performance with a of sensitivity of 90.8%, a specificity of 90.4%, an accuracy of 90.6%, and an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.94 compared to ANN (sensitivity at 80.8%, specificity at 77.8%, accuracy at 79.3% with AUC-ROC of 0.83) and BNN classifiers (sensitivity at 84.3%, specificity at 83%, accuracy at 83.6% with AUROC of 0.87). Using the sparse-DBN classifier, the classification performance improved further with sensitivity of 93.9%, a specificity of 92.3%, and an accuracy of 93.1% with AUROC of 0.96. Overall, the sparse-DBN classifier improved accuracy by 13.8, 9.5, and 2.5% over ANN, BNN, and DBN classifiers, respectively. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5339284/ /pubmed/28326009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00103 Text en Copyright © 2017 Chai, Ling, San, Naik, Nguyen, Tran, Craig and Nguyen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Chai, Rifai
Ling, Sai Ho
San, Phyo Phyo
Naik, Ganesh R.
Nguyen, Tuan N.
Tran, Yvonne
Craig, Ashley
Nguyen, Hung T.
Improving EEG-Based Driver Fatigue Classification Using Sparse-Deep Belief Networks
title Improving EEG-Based Driver Fatigue Classification Using Sparse-Deep Belief Networks
title_full Improving EEG-Based Driver Fatigue Classification Using Sparse-Deep Belief Networks
title_fullStr Improving EEG-Based Driver Fatigue Classification Using Sparse-Deep Belief Networks
title_full_unstemmed Improving EEG-Based Driver Fatigue Classification Using Sparse-Deep Belief Networks
title_short Improving EEG-Based Driver Fatigue Classification Using Sparse-Deep Belief Networks
title_sort improving eeg-based driver fatigue classification using sparse-deep belief networks
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5339284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326009
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00103
work_keys_str_mv AT chairifai improvingeegbaseddriverfatigueclassificationusingsparsedeepbeliefnetworks
AT lingsaiho improvingeegbaseddriverfatigueclassificationusingsparsedeepbeliefnetworks
AT sanphyophyo improvingeegbaseddriverfatigueclassificationusingsparsedeepbeliefnetworks
AT naikganeshr improvingeegbaseddriverfatigueclassificationusingsparsedeepbeliefnetworks
AT nguyentuann improvingeegbaseddriverfatigueclassificationusingsparsedeepbeliefnetworks
AT tranyvonne improvingeegbaseddriverfatigueclassificationusingsparsedeepbeliefnetworks
AT craigashley improvingeegbaseddriverfatigueclassificationusingsparsedeepbeliefnetworks
AT nguyenhungt improvingeegbaseddriverfatigueclassificationusingsparsedeepbeliefnetworks