Cargando…

The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive means by which to assess the structure and function of the central nervous system. Current practices involve the administration of multiple stimuli over target areas of a participant’s scalp. Decreasing the number of stimuli deliv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cavaleri, Rocco, Schabrun, Siobhan M., Chipchase, Lucy S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0440-8
_version_ 1782512770070085632
author Cavaleri, Rocco
Schabrun, Siobhan M.
Chipchase, Lucy S.
author_facet Cavaleri, Rocco
Schabrun, Siobhan M.
Chipchase, Lucy S.
author_sort Cavaleri, Rocco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive means by which to assess the structure and function of the central nervous system. Current practices involve the administration of multiple stimuli over target areas of a participant’s scalp. Decreasing the number of stimuli delivered during TMS assessments would improve time efficiency and decrease participant demand. However, doing so may also compromise the within- or between-session reliability of the technique. The aim of this review was therefore to determine the minimum number of TMS stimuli required to reliably measure (i) corticomotor excitability of a target muscle at a single cranial site and (ii) topography of the primary motor cortical representation of a target muscle across multiple cranial sites. METHODS: Database searches were performed to identify diagnostic reliability studies published before May 2015. Two independent reviewers extracted data from studies employing single-pulse TMS to measure (i) the corticomotor excitability at a single cranial site or (ii) the topographic cortical organisation of a target muscle across a number of cranial sites. Outcome measures included motor evoked potential amplitude, map volume, number of active map sites and location of the map centre of gravity. RESULTS: Only studies comparing the reliability of varying numbers of stimuli delivered to a single cranial site were identified. Five was the lowest number of stimuli that could be delivered to produce excellent within-session motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.95). Ten stimuli were required to achieve consistent between-session MEP amplitudes among healthy participants (ICC = 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.95). However, between-session reliability was influenced by participant characteristics, intersession intervals and target musculature. CONCLUSIONS: Further exploration of the reliability of multi-site TMS mapping is required. Five stimuli produce reliable MEP recordings during single-site TMS investigations involving one session. For single-site analyses involving multiple sessions, ten stimuli are recommended when investigating corticomotor excitability in healthy participants or the upper limb musculature. However, greater numbers of stimuli may be required for clinical populations or assessments involving the lower limb. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015024579 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0440-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5340029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53400292017-03-10 The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis Cavaleri, Rocco Schabrun, Siobhan M. Chipchase, Lucy S. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive means by which to assess the structure and function of the central nervous system. Current practices involve the administration of multiple stimuli over target areas of a participant’s scalp. Decreasing the number of stimuli delivered during TMS assessments would improve time efficiency and decrease participant demand. However, doing so may also compromise the within- or between-session reliability of the technique. The aim of this review was therefore to determine the minimum number of TMS stimuli required to reliably measure (i) corticomotor excitability of a target muscle at a single cranial site and (ii) topography of the primary motor cortical representation of a target muscle across multiple cranial sites. METHODS: Database searches were performed to identify diagnostic reliability studies published before May 2015. Two independent reviewers extracted data from studies employing single-pulse TMS to measure (i) the corticomotor excitability at a single cranial site or (ii) the topographic cortical organisation of a target muscle across a number of cranial sites. Outcome measures included motor evoked potential amplitude, map volume, number of active map sites and location of the map centre of gravity. RESULTS: Only studies comparing the reliability of varying numbers of stimuli delivered to a single cranial site were identified. Five was the lowest number of stimuli that could be delivered to produce excellent within-session motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.95). Ten stimuli were required to achieve consistent between-session MEP amplitudes among healthy participants (ICC = 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.95). However, between-session reliability was influenced by participant characteristics, intersession intervals and target musculature. CONCLUSIONS: Further exploration of the reliability of multi-site TMS mapping is required. Five stimuli produce reliable MEP recordings during single-site TMS investigations involving one session. For single-site analyses involving multiple sessions, ten stimuli are recommended when investigating corticomotor excitability in healthy participants or the upper limb musculature. However, greater numbers of stimuli may be required for clinical populations or assessments involving the lower limb. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015024579 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0440-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5340029/ /pubmed/28264713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0440-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Cavaleri, Rocco
Schabrun, Siobhan M.
Chipchase, Lucy S.
The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (tms): a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0440-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cavalerirocco thenumberofstimulirequiredtoreliablyassesscorticomotorexcitabilityandprimarymotorcorticalrepresentationsusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtmsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schabrunsiobhanm thenumberofstimulirequiredtoreliablyassesscorticomotorexcitabilityandprimarymotorcorticalrepresentationsusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtmsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chipchaselucys thenumberofstimulirequiredtoreliablyassesscorticomotorexcitabilityandprimarymotorcorticalrepresentationsusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtmsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cavalerirocco numberofstimulirequiredtoreliablyassesscorticomotorexcitabilityandprimarymotorcorticalrepresentationsusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtmsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schabrunsiobhanm numberofstimulirequiredtoreliablyassesscorticomotorexcitabilityandprimarymotorcorticalrepresentationsusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtmsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chipchaselucys numberofstimulirequiredtoreliablyassesscorticomotorexcitabilityandprimarymotorcorticalrepresentationsusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtmsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis