Cargando…

The Repertoire Dissimilarity Index as a method to compare lymphocyte receptor repertoires

BACKGROUND: The B and T cells of the human adaptive immune system leverage a highly diverse repertoire of antigen-specific receptors to protect the human body from pathogens. The sequencing and analysis of immune repertoires is emerging as an important tool to understand immune responses, whether be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bolen, Christopher R., Rubelt, Florian, Vander Heiden, Jason A., Davis, Mark M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1556-5
_version_ 1782512770988638208
author Bolen, Christopher R.
Rubelt, Florian
Vander Heiden, Jason A.
Davis, Mark M.
author_facet Bolen, Christopher R.
Rubelt, Florian
Vander Heiden, Jason A.
Davis, Mark M.
author_sort Bolen, Christopher R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The B and T cells of the human adaptive immune system leverage a highly diverse repertoire of antigen-specific receptors to protect the human body from pathogens. The sequencing and analysis of immune repertoires is emerging as an important tool to understand immune responses, whether beneficial or harmful (in the case of autoimmunity). However, methods for studying these repertoires, and for directly comparing different immune repertoires, are lacking. RESULTS: In this paper, we present a non-parametric method for directly comparing sequencing repertoires, with the goal of rigorously quantifying differences in V, D, and J gene segment utilization. This method, referred to as the Repertoire Dissimilarity Index (RDI), uses a bootstrapped subsampling approach to account for variance in sequencing depth, and, coupled with a data simulation approach, allows for direct quantification of the average variation between repertoires. We use the RDI method to recapitulate known differences in the formation of the CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell repertoires, and further show that antigen-driven activation of naïve CD8(+) T cells is more selective than in the CD4(+) repertoire, resulting in a more specialized CD8(+) memory repertoire. CONCLUSIONS: We prove that the RDI method is an accurate and versatile method for comparisons of immune repertoires. The RDI method has been implemented as an R package, and is available for download through Bitbucket. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1556-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5340033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53400332017-03-10 The Repertoire Dissimilarity Index as a method to compare lymphocyte receptor repertoires Bolen, Christopher R. Rubelt, Florian Vander Heiden, Jason A. Davis, Mark M. BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The B and T cells of the human adaptive immune system leverage a highly diverse repertoire of antigen-specific receptors to protect the human body from pathogens. The sequencing and analysis of immune repertoires is emerging as an important tool to understand immune responses, whether beneficial or harmful (in the case of autoimmunity). However, methods for studying these repertoires, and for directly comparing different immune repertoires, are lacking. RESULTS: In this paper, we present a non-parametric method for directly comparing sequencing repertoires, with the goal of rigorously quantifying differences in V, D, and J gene segment utilization. This method, referred to as the Repertoire Dissimilarity Index (RDI), uses a bootstrapped subsampling approach to account for variance in sequencing depth, and, coupled with a data simulation approach, allows for direct quantification of the average variation between repertoires. We use the RDI method to recapitulate known differences in the formation of the CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell repertoires, and further show that antigen-driven activation of naïve CD8(+) T cells is more selective than in the CD4(+) repertoire, resulting in a more specialized CD8(+) memory repertoire. CONCLUSIONS: We prove that the RDI method is an accurate and versatile method for comparisons of immune repertoires. The RDI method has been implemented as an R package, and is available for download through Bitbucket. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1556-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5340033/ /pubmed/28264647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1556-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Bolen, Christopher R.
Rubelt, Florian
Vander Heiden, Jason A.
Davis, Mark M.
The Repertoire Dissimilarity Index as a method to compare lymphocyte receptor repertoires
title The Repertoire Dissimilarity Index as a method to compare lymphocyte receptor repertoires
title_full The Repertoire Dissimilarity Index as a method to compare lymphocyte receptor repertoires
title_fullStr The Repertoire Dissimilarity Index as a method to compare lymphocyte receptor repertoires
title_full_unstemmed The Repertoire Dissimilarity Index as a method to compare lymphocyte receptor repertoires
title_short The Repertoire Dissimilarity Index as a method to compare lymphocyte receptor repertoires
title_sort repertoire dissimilarity index as a method to compare lymphocyte receptor repertoires
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1556-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bolenchristopherr therepertoiredissimilarityindexasamethodtocomparelymphocytereceptorrepertoires
AT rubeltflorian therepertoiredissimilarityindexasamethodtocomparelymphocytereceptorrepertoires
AT vanderheidenjasona therepertoiredissimilarityindexasamethodtocomparelymphocytereceptorrepertoires
AT davismarkm therepertoiredissimilarityindexasamethodtocomparelymphocytereceptorrepertoires
AT bolenchristopherr repertoiredissimilarityindexasamethodtocomparelymphocytereceptorrepertoires
AT rubeltflorian repertoiredissimilarityindexasamethodtocomparelymphocytereceptorrepertoires
AT vanderheidenjasona repertoiredissimilarityindexasamethodtocomparelymphocytereceptorrepertoires
AT davismarkm repertoiredissimilarityindexasamethodtocomparelymphocytereceptorrepertoires