Cargando…

Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK

Planting the perennial biomass crop Miscanthus in the UK could offset 2–13 Mt oil eq. yr(−1), contributing up to 10% of current energy use. Policymakers need assurance that upscaling Miscanthus production can be performed sustainably without negatively impacting essential food production or the wide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCalmont, Jon P., Hastings, Astley, McNamara, Niall P., Richter, Goetz M., Robson, Paul, Donnison, Iain S., Clifton‐Brown, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12294
_version_ 1782512805960744960
author McCalmont, Jon P.
Hastings, Astley
McNamara, Niall P.
Richter, Goetz M.
Robson, Paul
Donnison, Iain S.
Clifton‐Brown, John
author_facet McCalmont, Jon P.
Hastings, Astley
McNamara, Niall P.
Richter, Goetz M.
Robson, Paul
Donnison, Iain S.
Clifton‐Brown, John
author_sort McCalmont, Jon P.
collection PubMed
description Planting the perennial biomass crop Miscanthus in the UK could offset 2–13 Mt oil eq. yr(−1), contributing up to 10% of current energy use. Policymakers need assurance that upscaling Miscanthus production can be performed sustainably without negatively impacting essential food production or the wider environment. This study reviews a large body of Miscanthus relevant literature into concise summary statements. Perennial Miscanthus has energy output/input ratios 10 times higher (47.3 ± 2.2) than annual crops used for energy (4.7 ± 0.2 to 5.5 ± 0.2), and the total carbon cost of energy production (1.12 g CO(2)‐C eq. MJ(−1)) is 20–30 times lower than fossil fuels. Planting on former arable land generally increases soil organic carbon (SOC) with Miscanthus sequestering 0.7–2.2 Mg C4‐C ha(−1) yr(−1). Cultivation on grassland can cause a disturbance loss of SOC which is likely to be recovered during the lifetime of the crop and is potentially mitigated by fossil fuel offset. N(2)O emissions can be five times lower under unfertilized Miscanthus than annual crops and up to 100 times lower than intensive pasture. Nitrogen fertilizer is generally unnecessary except in low fertility soils. Herbicide is essential during the establishment years after which natural weed suppression by shading is sufficient. Pesticides are unnecessary. Water‐use efficiency is high (e.g. 5.5–9.2 g aerial DM (kg H(2)O)(−1), but high biomass productivity means increased water demand compared to cereal crops. The perennial nature and belowground biomass improves soil structure, increases water‐holding capacity (up by 100–150 mm), and reduces run‐off and erosion. Overwinter ripening increases landscape structural resources for wildlife. Reduced management intensity promotes earthworm diversity and abundance although poor litter palatability may reduce individual biomass. Chemical leaching into field boundaries is lower than comparable agriculture, improving soil and water habitat quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5340280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53402802017-03-20 Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK McCalmont, Jon P. Hastings, Astley McNamara, Niall P. Richter, Goetz M. Robson, Paul Donnison, Iain S. Clifton‐Brown, John Glob Change Biol Bioenergy Research Reviews Planting the perennial biomass crop Miscanthus in the UK could offset 2–13 Mt oil eq. yr(−1), contributing up to 10% of current energy use. Policymakers need assurance that upscaling Miscanthus production can be performed sustainably without negatively impacting essential food production or the wider environment. This study reviews a large body of Miscanthus relevant literature into concise summary statements. Perennial Miscanthus has energy output/input ratios 10 times higher (47.3 ± 2.2) than annual crops used for energy (4.7 ± 0.2 to 5.5 ± 0.2), and the total carbon cost of energy production (1.12 g CO(2)‐C eq. MJ(−1)) is 20–30 times lower than fossil fuels. Planting on former arable land generally increases soil organic carbon (SOC) with Miscanthus sequestering 0.7–2.2 Mg C4‐C ha(−1) yr(−1). Cultivation on grassland can cause a disturbance loss of SOC which is likely to be recovered during the lifetime of the crop and is potentially mitigated by fossil fuel offset. N(2)O emissions can be five times lower under unfertilized Miscanthus than annual crops and up to 100 times lower than intensive pasture. Nitrogen fertilizer is generally unnecessary except in low fertility soils. Herbicide is essential during the establishment years after which natural weed suppression by shading is sufficient. Pesticides are unnecessary. Water‐use efficiency is high (e.g. 5.5–9.2 g aerial DM (kg H(2)O)(−1), but high biomass productivity means increased water demand compared to cereal crops. The perennial nature and belowground biomass improves soil structure, increases water‐holding capacity (up by 100–150 mm), and reduces run‐off and erosion. Overwinter ripening increases landscape structural resources for wildlife. Reduced management intensity promotes earthworm diversity and abundance although poor litter palatability may reduce individual biomass. Chemical leaching into field boundaries is lower than comparable agriculture, improving soil and water habitat quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-08-18 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5340280/ /pubmed/28331551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12294 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Global Change Biology Bioenergy Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Reviews
McCalmont, Jon P.
Hastings, Astley
McNamara, Niall P.
Richter, Goetz M.
Robson, Paul
Donnison, Iain S.
Clifton‐Brown, John
Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK
title Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK
title_full Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK
title_fullStr Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK
title_short Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK
title_sort environmental costs and benefits of growing miscanthus for bioenergy in the uk
topic Research Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12294
work_keys_str_mv AT mccalmontjonp environmentalcostsandbenefitsofgrowingmiscanthusforbioenergyintheuk
AT hastingsastley environmentalcostsandbenefitsofgrowingmiscanthusforbioenergyintheuk
AT mcnamaraniallp environmentalcostsandbenefitsofgrowingmiscanthusforbioenergyintheuk
AT richtergoetzm environmentalcostsandbenefitsofgrowingmiscanthusforbioenergyintheuk
AT robsonpaul environmentalcostsandbenefitsofgrowingmiscanthusforbioenergyintheuk
AT donnisoniains environmentalcostsandbenefitsofgrowingmiscanthusforbioenergyintheuk
AT cliftonbrownjohn environmentalcostsandbenefitsofgrowingmiscanthusforbioenergyintheuk