Cargando…
Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome
The gut microbiome is a dynamic system that changes with host development, health, behavior, diet, and microbe-microbe interactions. Prior work on gut microbial time series has largely focused on autoregressive models (e.g. Lotka-Volterra). However, we show that most of the variance in microbial tim...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28222117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005364 |
_version_ | 1782512825075236864 |
---|---|
author | Gibbons, Sean M. Kearney, Sean M. Smillie, Chris S. Alm, Eric J. |
author_facet | Gibbons, Sean M. Kearney, Sean M. Smillie, Chris S. Alm, Eric J. |
author_sort | Gibbons, Sean M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The gut microbiome is a dynamic system that changes with host development, health, behavior, diet, and microbe-microbe interactions. Prior work on gut microbial time series has largely focused on autoregressive models (e.g. Lotka-Volterra). However, we show that most of the variance in microbial time series is non-autoregressive. In addition, we show how community state-clustering is flawed when it comes to characterizing within-host dynamics and that more continuous methods are required. Most organisms exhibited stable, mean-reverting behavior suggestive of fixed carrying capacities and abundant taxa were largely shared across individuals. This mean-reverting behavior allowed us to apply sparse vector autoregression (sVAR)—a multivariate method developed for econometrics—to model the autoregressive component of gut community dynamics. We find a strong phylogenetic signal in the non-autoregressive co-variance from our sVAR model residuals, which suggests niche filtering. We show how changes in diet are also non-autoregressive and that Operational Taxonomic Units strongly correlated with dietary variables have much less of an autoregressive component to their variance, which suggests that diet is a major driver of microbial dynamics. Autoregressive variance appears to be driven by multi-day recovery from frequent facultative anaerobe blooms, which may be driven by fluctuations in luminal redox. Overall, we identify two dynamic regimes within the human gut microbiota: one likely driven by external environmental fluctuations, and the other by internal processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5340412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53404122017-03-27 Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome Gibbons, Sean M. Kearney, Sean M. Smillie, Chris S. Alm, Eric J. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article The gut microbiome is a dynamic system that changes with host development, health, behavior, diet, and microbe-microbe interactions. Prior work on gut microbial time series has largely focused on autoregressive models (e.g. Lotka-Volterra). However, we show that most of the variance in microbial time series is non-autoregressive. In addition, we show how community state-clustering is flawed when it comes to characterizing within-host dynamics and that more continuous methods are required. Most organisms exhibited stable, mean-reverting behavior suggestive of fixed carrying capacities and abundant taxa were largely shared across individuals. This mean-reverting behavior allowed us to apply sparse vector autoregression (sVAR)—a multivariate method developed for econometrics—to model the autoregressive component of gut community dynamics. We find a strong phylogenetic signal in the non-autoregressive co-variance from our sVAR model residuals, which suggests niche filtering. We show how changes in diet are also non-autoregressive and that Operational Taxonomic Units strongly correlated with dietary variables have much less of an autoregressive component to their variance, which suggests that diet is a major driver of microbial dynamics. Autoregressive variance appears to be driven by multi-day recovery from frequent facultative anaerobe blooms, which may be driven by fluctuations in luminal redox. Overall, we identify two dynamic regimes within the human gut microbiota: one likely driven by external environmental fluctuations, and the other by internal processes. Public Library of Science 2017-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5340412/ /pubmed/28222117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005364 Text en © 2017 Gibbons et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gibbons, Sean M. Kearney, Sean M. Smillie, Chris S. Alm, Eric J. Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome |
title | Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome |
title_full | Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome |
title_fullStr | Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome |
title_full_unstemmed | Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome |
title_short | Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome |
title_sort | two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28222117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gibbonsseanm twodynamicregimesinthehumangutmicrobiome AT kearneyseanm twodynamicregimesinthehumangutmicrobiome AT smilliechriss twodynamicregimesinthehumangutmicrobiome AT almericj twodynamicregimesinthehumangutmicrobiome |